22.01.2015 Views

The case for a chief operating officer - Ernst & Young

The case for a chief operating officer - Ernst & Young

The case for a chief operating officer - Ernst & Young

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case study<br />

“If you think of the critical role they now play in new<br />

channels to market and in enabling revenue growth,<br />

it becomes clear why the COO role has become<br />

so fundamental to the success of the business.”<br />

Adrian Edwards<br />

EMEIA Advisory Markets Leader, <strong>Ernst</strong> & <strong>Young</strong><br />

1. “Banking bill wins favor as revised,” <strong>The</strong><br />

New York Times, 25 August 1935.<br />

2. Crist Kolder volatility report, Crist Kolder,<br />

2012.<br />

3. “<strong>The</strong> rise of the COO,” Harvard Business<br />

Review, 9 November 2011.<br />

In contrast to some of the more<br />

recent additions to the C-suite, such<br />

as the <strong>chief</strong> privacy <strong>officer</strong> or <strong>chief</strong><br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation security <strong>officer</strong>, the COO<br />

is well established. Since at least 1935,<br />

various US companies have counted<br />

COOs among their leadership teams. 1<br />

But despite this lengthy tenure, the<br />

position has never quite gained the same<br />

permanence on the executive management<br />

team as other perennial staples, such as<br />

the CEO or <strong>chief</strong> financial <strong>officer</strong> (CFO).<br />

Indeed, during the past decade, a number<br />

of management journals and studies have<br />

raised the prospect that the role of the<br />

COO may even be in decline. Between<br />

2000 and 2012, the proportion of Fortune<br />

500 and S&P 500 companies that had a<br />

dedicated COO position fell from about<br />

half (49%) to just over one-third (35%),<br />

according to Crist Kolder. 2<br />

What lies behind this In some<br />

companies, there has been a decision<br />

to split the responsibilities of the COO<br />

across several other executives, perhaps<br />

in response to rising complexity, or else<br />

because it more closely fits the operational<br />

needs of the business. For example, in<br />

the power and utilities sector, dedicated<br />

executives run the generation and trading,<br />

transmission and distribution and retail<br />

arms of the business. <strong>The</strong>se roles are<br />

effectively that of a COO, but given the<br />

size and importance of these units, they<br />

are often close to being a de facto CEO<br />

of these units. Elsewhere, many of these<br />

responsibilities have been folded into<br />

the role of the CEO, not least in the wake<br />

of growing legislation to clamp down on<br />

a lack of executive oversight, such as<br />

Sarbanes-Oxley.<br />

But this narrative of relative decline<br />

doesn’t quite tell the full story. In Europe, <strong>for</strong><br />

example, where the COO title is typically far<br />

newer, the position appears to be on the rise.<br />

From near non-existence just a decade earlier,<br />

nearly 4 in 10 of the 97 largest companies<br />

within the Eurozone and UK now have a<br />

COO position, according to Harvard Business<br />

Review. 3 <strong>The</strong> majority of these have only<br />

ever had one predecessor in this position,<br />

illustrating how recent an arrival it is.<br />

Turnaround time<br />

What lies behind this shift <strong>The</strong> DNA of the<br />

COO, new research from <strong>Ernst</strong> & <strong>Young</strong>,<br />

argues that several <strong>for</strong>ces are helping to<br />

make the <strong>case</strong> <strong>for</strong> a dedicated operational<br />

18 Volume 5 │ Issue 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!