The case for a chief operating officer - Ernst & Young
The case for a chief operating officer - Ernst & Young
The case for a chief operating officer - Ernst & Young
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Case study<br />
“If you think of the critical role they now play in new<br />
channels to market and in enabling revenue growth,<br />
it becomes clear why the COO role has become<br />
so fundamental to the success of the business.”<br />
Adrian Edwards<br />
EMEIA Advisory Markets Leader, <strong>Ernst</strong> & <strong>Young</strong><br />
1. “Banking bill wins favor as revised,” <strong>The</strong><br />
New York Times, 25 August 1935.<br />
2. Crist Kolder volatility report, Crist Kolder,<br />
2012.<br />
3. “<strong>The</strong> rise of the COO,” Harvard Business<br />
Review, 9 November 2011.<br />
In contrast to some of the more<br />
recent additions to the C-suite, such<br />
as the <strong>chief</strong> privacy <strong>officer</strong> or <strong>chief</strong><br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation security <strong>officer</strong>, the COO<br />
is well established. Since at least 1935,<br />
various US companies have counted<br />
COOs among their leadership teams. 1<br />
But despite this lengthy tenure, the<br />
position has never quite gained the same<br />
permanence on the executive management<br />
team as other perennial staples, such as<br />
the CEO or <strong>chief</strong> financial <strong>officer</strong> (CFO).<br />
Indeed, during the past decade, a number<br />
of management journals and studies have<br />
raised the prospect that the role of the<br />
COO may even be in decline. Between<br />
2000 and 2012, the proportion of Fortune<br />
500 and S&P 500 companies that had a<br />
dedicated COO position fell from about<br />
half (49%) to just over one-third (35%),<br />
according to Crist Kolder. 2<br />
What lies behind this In some<br />
companies, there has been a decision<br />
to split the responsibilities of the COO<br />
across several other executives, perhaps<br />
in response to rising complexity, or else<br />
because it more closely fits the operational<br />
needs of the business. For example, in<br />
the power and utilities sector, dedicated<br />
executives run the generation and trading,<br />
transmission and distribution and retail<br />
arms of the business. <strong>The</strong>se roles are<br />
effectively that of a COO, but given the<br />
size and importance of these units, they<br />
are often close to being a de facto CEO<br />
of these units. Elsewhere, many of these<br />
responsibilities have been folded into<br />
the role of the CEO, not least in the wake<br />
of growing legislation to clamp down on<br />
a lack of executive oversight, such as<br />
Sarbanes-Oxley.<br />
But this narrative of relative decline<br />
doesn’t quite tell the full story. In Europe, <strong>for</strong><br />
example, where the COO title is typically far<br />
newer, the position appears to be on the rise.<br />
From near non-existence just a decade earlier,<br />
nearly 4 in 10 of the 97 largest companies<br />
within the Eurozone and UK now have a<br />
COO position, according to Harvard Business<br />
Review. 3 <strong>The</strong> majority of these have only<br />
ever had one predecessor in this position,<br />
illustrating how recent an arrival it is.<br />
Turnaround time<br />
What lies behind this shift <strong>The</strong> DNA of the<br />
COO, new research from <strong>Ernst</strong> & <strong>Young</strong>,<br />
argues that several <strong>for</strong>ces are helping to<br />
make the <strong>case</strong> <strong>for</strong> a dedicated operational<br />
18 Volume 5 │ Issue 1