13.11.2012 Views

Manual for the Benzodiazepine Dependence Questionnaire (BDEPQ)

Manual for the Benzodiazepine Dependence Questionnaire (BDEPQ)

Manual for the Benzodiazepine Dependence Questionnaire (BDEPQ)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32 PROPERTIES OF <strong>BDEPQ</strong> TOTAL SCORES<br />

Normality<br />

A Lillie<strong>for</strong>s test (Lillie<strong>for</strong>s, 1967) was per<strong>for</strong>med to examine <strong>the</strong> normality<br />

of <strong>BDEPQ</strong> total scores. Scores from both <strong>the</strong> rst and second waves were not<br />

normally distributed (Wave 1: Maximum di erence = 0:136�p < :05, Wave 2:<br />

Maximum di erence = 0:111�p < :05). The skewness of <strong>BDEPQ</strong> scores was 0:906<br />

at wave oneand0:889 at wave two. Wilkinson (1990) recommends 2 q 6<br />

n as a<br />

critical value <strong>for</strong> skewness, which is0:356 <strong>for</strong> wave one and 0:376 <strong>for</strong> wave two.<br />

Comparison with <strong>the</strong>se values indicates signi cant positive skewness in <strong>BDEPQ</strong><br />

scores. The kurtosis of total scores was 0:376 at wave one and 0:264 at wave<br />

two. The signi cance of <strong>the</strong>se values can be gauged by comparison using <strong>the</strong> same<br />

<strong>for</strong>mula (Wilkinson, 1990). This indicates that <strong>BDEPQ</strong> scores from wave one are<br />

leptokurtic while those from wave two havea`peakedness' similar to <strong>the</strong> normal<br />

distribution. The distribution of total <strong>BDEPQ</strong> scores from wave one is shown<br />

graphically in Figure 1.<br />

Internal consistency<br />

Coe cient alphas <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> total and sub-scale scores collected in <strong>the</strong> second<br />

wave con rm <strong>the</strong> reliability of <strong>the</strong> scales. Because <strong>the</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation was collected<br />

from <strong>the</strong> same respondents it is likely that regression toward <strong>the</strong> mean reduced <strong>the</strong><br />

variability of scores and in uenced <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong>se coe cients from <strong>the</strong> second<br />

wave.<br />

The standard error of measurement of total and sub-scale <strong>BDEPQ</strong> scores is<br />

shown in Table 8. These values were calculated with <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>mula described by<br />

Ghiselli, Campbell, and Zedeck (1981, p. 206) and indicate <strong>the</strong> con dence that<br />

can be placed in an individuals score on <strong>the</strong> scale. The table shows 4:47 as <strong>the</strong> error<br />

of measurement <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> rst wave. A 95% con dence interval around any score<br />

on <strong>the</strong> <strong>BDEPQ</strong> would thus be 1:96 times this error of measurement (8:76). For<br />

example if a person scored 60 on <strong>the</strong> <strong>BDEPQ</strong> prior to detoxi cation, completed<br />

<strong>the</strong> scale six months later and scored 50, one could be 95% sure that this change<br />

of 10 scale points was not due to chance or error in <strong>the</strong> scale. The estimates of<br />

standard error of measurement from wave one should be used <strong>for</strong> any practical<br />

purposes as regression to <strong>the</strong> mean may have reduced <strong>the</strong> variance in wave two<br />

scores and consequently reduced <strong>the</strong> error of measurement.<br />

Temporal stability of <strong>BDEPQ</strong> items<br />

The three to four month test-retest correlation between scores on <strong>the</strong> 30-item<br />

<strong>BDEPQ</strong> in wave one and wave two was 0:88 (n = 128). The 3 subscales show<br />

similar test-retest coe cients of 0:83 <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> general dependence subscale (n =<br />

175), 0:73 <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> pleasant e ects subscale (n = 160), and 0:87 <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> perceived<br />

need subscale. This indicates that <strong>the</strong> scale is measuring a relatively stable aspect<br />

of <strong>the</strong> respondents attitudes. As discussed in <strong>the</strong> introduction dependence is best

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!