Manual for the Benzodiazepine Dependence Questionnaire (BDEPQ)
Manual for the Benzodiazepine Dependence Questionnaire (BDEPQ)
Manual for the Benzodiazepine Dependence Questionnaire (BDEPQ)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
32 PROPERTIES OF <strong>BDEPQ</strong> TOTAL SCORES<br />
Normality<br />
A Lillie<strong>for</strong>s test (Lillie<strong>for</strong>s, 1967) was per<strong>for</strong>med to examine <strong>the</strong> normality<br />
of <strong>BDEPQ</strong> total scores. Scores from both <strong>the</strong> rst and second waves were not<br />
normally distributed (Wave 1: Maximum di erence = 0:136�p < :05, Wave 2:<br />
Maximum di erence = 0:111�p < :05). The skewness of <strong>BDEPQ</strong> scores was 0:906<br />
at wave oneand0:889 at wave two. Wilkinson (1990) recommends 2 q 6<br />
n as a<br />
critical value <strong>for</strong> skewness, which is0:356 <strong>for</strong> wave one and 0:376 <strong>for</strong> wave two.<br />
Comparison with <strong>the</strong>se values indicates signi cant positive skewness in <strong>BDEPQ</strong><br />
scores. The kurtosis of total scores was 0:376 at wave one and 0:264 at wave<br />
two. The signi cance of <strong>the</strong>se values can be gauged by comparison using <strong>the</strong> same<br />
<strong>for</strong>mula (Wilkinson, 1990). This indicates that <strong>BDEPQ</strong> scores from wave one are<br />
leptokurtic while those from wave two havea`peakedness' similar to <strong>the</strong> normal<br />
distribution. The distribution of total <strong>BDEPQ</strong> scores from wave one is shown<br />
graphically in Figure 1.<br />
Internal consistency<br />
Coe cient alphas <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> total and sub-scale scores collected in <strong>the</strong> second<br />
wave con rm <strong>the</strong> reliability of <strong>the</strong> scales. Because <strong>the</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation was collected<br />
from <strong>the</strong> same respondents it is likely that regression toward <strong>the</strong> mean reduced <strong>the</strong><br />
variability of scores and in uenced <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong>se coe cients from <strong>the</strong> second<br />
wave.<br />
The standard error of measurement of total and sub-scale <strong>BDEPQ</strong> scores is<br />
shown in Table 8. These values were calculated with <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>mula described by<br />
Ghiselli, Campbell, and Zedeck (1981, p. 206) and indicate <strong>the</strong> con dence that<br />
can be placed in an individuals score on <strong>the</strong> scale. The table shows 4:47 as <strong>the</strong> error<br />
of measurement <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> rst wave. A 95% con dence interval around any score<br />
on <strong>the</strong> <strong>BDEPQ</strong> would thus be 1:96 times this error of measurement (8:76). For<br />
example if a person scored 60 on <strong>the</strong> <strong>BDEPQ</strong> prior to detoxi cation, completed<br />
<strong>the</strong> scale six months later and scored 50, one could be 95% sure that this change<br />
of 10 scale points was not due to chance or error in <strong>the</strong> scale. The estimates of<br />
standard error of measurement from wave one should be used <strong>for</strong> any practical<br />
purposes as regression to <strong>the</strong> mean may have reduced <strong>the</strong> variance in wave two<br />
scores and consequently reduced <strong>the</strong> error of measurement.<br />
Temporal stability of <strong>BDEPQ</strong> items<br />
The three to four month test-retest correlation between scores on <strong>the</strong> 30-item<br />
<strong>BDEPQ</strong> in wave one and wave two was 0:88 (n = 128). The 3 subscales show<br />
similar test-retest coe cients of 0:83 <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> general dependence subscale (n =<br />
175), 0:73 <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> pleasant e ects subscale (n = 160), and 0:87 <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> perceived<br />
need subscale. This indicates that <strong>the</strong> scale is measuring a relatively stable aspect<br />
of <strong>the</strong> respondents attitudes. As discussed in <strong>the</strong> introduction dependence is best