Volume 8 Issue 1 (pdf) - Andrew John Publishing Inc
Volume 8 Issue 1 (pdf) - Andrew John Publishing Inc
Volume 8 Issue 1 (pdf) - Andrew John Publishing Inc
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
|<br />
Figure 1. Separation of the reticular lamina between the second and<br />
the third row of outer hair cells (arrows) following exposure to an<br />
impulse noise. OHC1, OHC2 and OHC3 indicate the first, the<br />
second and the third row of outer hair cells.<br />
Figure 2. <strong>Inc</strong>rease in E-cadherin immunoreactivity (green fluorescence, arrows) in<br />
the hair cells exhibiting condensed nuclei (red fluorescence, double-arrows) in a rat<br />
cochlea following acoustic stress.<br />
after the noise exposure, up-regulation<br />
of gene expression was the dominant<br />
change. As the time elapsed after the<br />
noise exposure, downregulation of gene<br />
expression became evident This<br />
dynamic nature of gene expression<br />
change is likely to be caused by the shift<br />
of the triggering factors for cochlear<br />
injury. The early damage is associated<br />
with direct mechanical stress that occurs<br />
during the period of acoustic<br />
overstimulation, whereas the secondary<br />
damage is associated with subsequent<br />
cellular events, which include metabolic<br />
disruption, oxidative stress, and ion<br />
imbalance.<br />
The changes in the expression levels of<br />
adhesion genes are also related to the<br />
level of hearing loss. Our correlation<br />
analysis revealed that the expression<br />
levels of several genes, including Sgce,<br />
Sell, Itga5, Selp, and Cntn1, were related,<br />
either positively or negatively, to the<br />
level of the threshold shift of the<br />
auditory brainstem response. These<br />
genes may contribute to the individual<br />
variation in the magnitude of cochlear<br />
damage after acoustic trauma.<br />
The changes in the expression patterns<br />
of adhesion-related genes were found to<br />
be spatially correlated with the<br />
apoptotic activity of hair cells. We<br />
observed an increased immunoreactivity<br />
of E-cadherin, an adhesion<br />
protein, in the circumferential rings of<br />
the hair cells that exhibit an apoptotic<br />
nuclear morphology, suggesting that the<br />
change in E-cadherin expression is<br />
associated with apoptotic degeneration<br />
(Figure 2). Interestingly, certain hair<br />
cells with increased E-cadherin<br />
immunoreactivity have a relativelynormal<br />
nuclear morphology, suggesting<br />
that the E-cadherin change is an early<br />
event of apoptosis.<br />
Molecular mechanisms responsible for<br />
adhesion disruption are not clear.<br />
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a<br />
group of endopeptidases that participate<br />
in the degradation of all components of<br />
the extracellular matrix, including the<br />
molecules responsible for cell-cell<br />
junctions. These enzymes include<br />
collagenases, gelatinases, stromelysins,<br />
matrilysins, and other proteinases, each<br />
with specialized cellular compartmentalization<br />
and substrate specificity. We<br />
therefore examined the involvement of<br />
these proteins in noise-induced cochlear<br />
damage. 7 Using a RNA-sequencing<br />
technique, we identified multiple MMP<br />
and related gene products, indicating<br />
that MMPs are constitutively expressed<br />
in the cochlea. Following exposure to a<br />
broadband noise at 120 dB SPL, the<br />
expression pattern of certain MMP<br />
genes was altered. For example, the<br />
expression of MMP7, which was<br />
undetectable under the physiological<br />
condition, became detectable in the<br />
cochlear sensory epithelium. Moreover,<br />
the expression level of intrinsic MMP<br />
inhibitors (tissue inhibitors of<br />
metalloproteinases) was altered after<br />
noise exposure. These observations<br />
suggest that MMPs are implicated in<br />
cochlear responses to acoustic<br />
overstimulation. Thus far, the biological<br />
46 CANADIAN HEARING REPORT | REVUE CANADIENNE D’AUDITION