Military Communications and Information Technology: A Trusted ...
Military Communications and Information Technology: A Trusted ... Military Communications and Information Technology: A Trusted ...
36 Military Communications and Information Technology... [19] Model Driven Solutions, “Enterprise Service Oriented Architecture Using the OMG SoaML Standard”, http://www.omg.org/news/ /whitepapers/ [20] T. Gardner, “Mapping from UML to the Business Process Execution Language for Web Services (BPEL4WS) Web Services”, MDA Implementers’ Workshop Succeeding with Model Driven Systems, Orlando, USA, 2003. [21] D.C. Petriu, C. Shousha, A. Jalnapurkar, “Architecture Based Performance Analysis Applied to a Telecommunication Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 26 Issue 11, November 2000, IEEE Press Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 1049-1065. [22] U. Wahli, L. Ackerman, A. Di Bari, Building SOA Solutions Using the Rational SDP, Redbooks, 2007.
Openness in Military Systems Jessica Connah, Abigail Solomon, John McInnes, Olwen Worthington, Dale Chambers Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Salisbury, Wiltshire, England, www.dstl.gov.uk Abstract: Traditional approaches to military network procurement taken by government can lead to vender lock-in, reducing the potential for competition when the systems need refreshing or major upgrades, and also for through life maintenance requirements. One solution to these problems could be to require an open systems approach in military systems procurement, reducing single supplier issues through well defined architectures, interfaces and ‘open by design’ concepts. The paper presents a technical analysis of UK military systems procurement over the last few decades to provide context for the current open systems approach. The paper then explicitly discusses the potential benefits and risks of such an approach and finally explores how this may impact on air interface, network and security systems. Research into Open Systems Architecture (OSA) approaches from two Ministry of Defence (MOD) programs is reviewed; the Modular Open Systems Architecture (MOSA), and the Land Open Systems Architecture (LOSA), whose aim is to introduce openness within the land environment. The primary conclusions of the work which will be elaborated in the paper are; that openness is key to providing increased interoperability, flexibility and agility, and that benefits can be obtained from designing a degree of openness into all aspects of military networks, for example in security, air interfaces and waveforms. Keywords: open; open system; open system architecture; openness; military; MOD; networks; interoperability I. Introduction Where military capability is dependent on complex system technologies, UK defense has needed to invest heavily to sustain the advantage necessary for success in the battle space. The early costs of raising the technology boundary to the next level and exploiting this in new military equipment can be significant. Delivery times are often long; therefore the risk that the original capability requirement or technology opportunity has shifted increases. Once delivered, enhancements to bespoke military equipment can be expensive and often unaffordable, as the incumbent industrial supplier levers the Ministry © Crown copyright 2012. Published with the permission of the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory on behalf of the Controller of HMSO. Reference number DSTL/CP65717.
- Page 1 and 2: Military Communications and Informa
- Page 3 and 4: Contents Foreword .................
- Page 5: Contents 5 Methodology for Gatherin
- Page 8 and 9: 8 Military Communications and Infor
- Page 11 and 12: Building a Layered Enterprise Archi
- Page 13 and 14: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 15 and 16: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 17 and 18: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 21 and 22: Applying NAF for Performance Analys
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 27 and 28: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 31 and 32: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 35: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 49 and 50: The Concept of Integration Tool for
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 59 and 60: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 61 and 62: CFBLNet: A Coalition Capability Ena
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 65 and 66: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 71 and 72: Selected Aspects of Effective RCIED
- Page 73 and 74: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 81: Chapter 1: Concepts and Solutions f
- Page 84 and 85: 84 Military Communications and Info
36 <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Communications</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Information</strong> <strong>Technology</strong>...<br />
[19] Model Driven Solutions, “Enterprise Service Oriented Architecture Using the OMG<br />
SoaML St<strong>and</strong>ard”, http://www.omg.org/news/ /whitepapers/<br />
[20] T. Gardner, “Mapping from UML to the Business Process Execution Language for<br />
Web Services (BPEL4WS) Web Services”, MDA Implementers’ Workshop Succeeding<br />
with Model Driven Systems, Orl<strong>and</strong>o, USA, 2003.<br />
[21] D.C. Petriu, C. Shousha, A. Jalnapurkar, “Architecture Based Performance Analysis<br />
Applied to a Telecommunication Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering,<br />
vol. 26 Issue 11, November 2000, IEEE Press Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 1049-1065.<br />
[22] U. Wahli, L. Ackerman, A. Di Bari, Building SOA Solutions Using the Rational SDP,<br />
Redbooks, 2007.