Military Communications and Information Technology: A Trusted ...
Military Communications and Information Technology: A Trusted ... Military Communications and Information Technology: A Trusted ...
336 Military Communications and Information Technology... should be seen as one of the three main stages of the LL process. The recommending process involves three main stages: • preparation of recommendations, • implementation of recommendations, • monitoring and updating of the recommendations (recommendations management). Recommendations propose changes in regulations, the system of training and doctrines, based on the analyzed experiences (which are obtained as daily observations of the daily missions). The quality of recommendations is largely determined both by the competent collecting of information about events and the results obtained in a complete analysis of the collected observations. The development of appropriate recommendations to a large extent determines their use in theory and/or military practice. Each phase of this process is dependent on each other. Therefore, it is worth noting, that the major determinants of the generation of added value in the LL process is the interdependence of particular LL phases. Interdependence is manifested primarily through the presence of many couplings, mainly between phases. The results obtained from the preceding phase are the base point (input data) to implement the next phase. The primary objective is to produce a recommendation during the recommendation process. The intermediate objectives of this process are consistent with the objectives of the SIMS, project, i.e. improvement of the following processes: • mission planning, • and execution of missions. Achieving these objectives implies the development of a formalized document that contains a parametrised recommendation. This means that such a document (Recommendation) should include, among others the following content: • defined and measurable goal of recommendations, • tasks to be executed, • boundary conditions of these tasks. Expected results of implementatin of this phase of the LL process allow to: • increase the effectiveness of the mission, • increase the level of situational awareness in the daily missions, • verify and improve the methodology referring to the interpretation of documents concerning the operations of the army – in particular for recommending changes which will enhance soldiers capabilities: ✓ tactical (following Rules of Combat ROC) ✓ operational-tactical (the development of mission plans/planning process) ✓ strategic (improving doctrine), • increase the effectiveness of training (for example, new content will be introduced in training programs, there will be more case-s, and many diverse instances of their use will be discussed).
Chapter 3: Information Technology for Interoperability and Decision... 337 A recommendation shall be a formal document and should be composed of three main sections: • header, • body (appropriate recommendation), • signature/authorization. In the header section the following fields should appear: • name of the recommendation (e.g. streamlining procedures for the identification of ID), • reference of the recommendation (e.g.: Rec/14/2011/F2,F3,F4) ✓ Rec – recommendation, ✓ number of recommendation, ✓ YYYY year in which the recommendation was developed, ✓ a phase (phase) of the mission recommendation (optional): ■ F1 – prior to the planning phase of the mission, ■ F2 – the planning phase, ■ F3 – the training phase, ■ F4 – the execution phase, ■ F5 – the mission evaluation phase, • the recommendations creation date, writens in a suitable format (e.g. YYYY. MM.DD/2011.04.18), • place of issue (e.g. Poland, Poznan), • originator of the recommendation, ✓ rank, name and surname (e.g. Sgt. John Doe), ✓ originating institution / organisational unit (e.g., the General Staff of Army / Department of Strategy and Defence Planning), • recipient (recipients) of recommendations: ✓ Country / unit name (e.g. Afghanistan / 6 Logistic Base), ✓ An institution / organisational unit (e.g., the General Staff of Army / Department of Strategy and Defence Planning), • a concise description (a few sentences of description what the recommendation refers to). General knowledge of the recommendation phase in the process of constnt learning at the stage of implementation manifests itself with specific problems which have a very complex structure and form an immense intellectual challenge. It seems obvious that organisations should benefit from processing the knowledge related to historical events. Such events should be well-documented and include both positive and negative aspects. IV. LL tool functions and architecture The SIMS LL tool is assumed to be used for effective gathering of observations, processing them and applying the results of this process within military structures.
- Page 285 and 286: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 287 and 288: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 289 and 290: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 291 and 292: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 293: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 296 and 297: 296 Military Communications and Inf
- Page 298 and 299: 298 Military Communications and Inf
- Page 300 and 301: 300 Military Communications and Inf
- Page 302 and 303: 302 Military Communications and Inf
- Page 305 and 306: Commanding Multi-Robot Systems with
- Page 307 and 308: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 309 and 310: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 311 and 312: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 313 and 314: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 315 and 316: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 317 and 318: Application of CID Server in Decisi
- Page 319 and 320: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 321 and 322: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 323 and 324: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 325 and 326: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 327 and 328: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 329 and 330: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 331 and 332: Managing Lessons Learnt from Daily
- Page 333 and 334: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 335: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 339 and 340: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 341 and 342: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 343: Chapter 3: Information Technology f
- Page 347 and 348: Federated Cyber Defence System - Ap
- Page 349 and 350: Chapter 4: Information Assurance &
- Page 351 and 352: Chapter 4: Information Assurance &
- Page 353 and 354: Chapter 4: Information Assurance &
- Page 355 and 356: Chapter 4: Information Assurance &
- Page 357: Chapter 4: Information Assurance &
- Page 360 and 361: 360 Military Communications and Inf
- Page 362 and 363: 362 Military Communications and Inf
- Page 364 and 365: 364 Military Communications and Inf
- Page 366 and 367: 366 Military Communications and Inf
- Page 368 and 369: 368 Military Communications and Inf
- Page 370 and 371: 370 Military Communications and Inf
- Page 372 and 373: 372 Military Communications and Inf
- Page 374 and 375: 374 Military Communications and Inf
- Page 377 and 378: Development of High Assurance Guard
- Page 379 and 380: Chapter 4: Information Assurance &
- Page 381 and 382: Chapter 4: Information Assurance &
- Page 383 and 384: Chapter 4: Information Assurance &
- Page 385 and 386: Chapter 4: Information Assurance &
Chapter 3: <strong>Information</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> for Interoperability <strong>and</strong> Decision...<br />
337<br />
A recommendation shall be a formal document <strong>and</strong> should be composed<br />
of three main sections:<br />
• header,<br />
• body (appropriate recommendation),<br />
• signature/authorization.<br />
In the header section the following fields should appear:<br />
• name of the recommendation (e.g. streamlining procedures for the identification<br />
of ID),<br />
• reference of the recommendation (e.g.: Rec/14/2011/F2,F3,F4)<br />
✓ Rec – recommendation,<br />
✓ number of recommendation,<br />
✓ YYYY year in which the recommendation was developed,<br />
✓ a phase (phase) of the mission recommendation (optional):<br />
■ F1 – prior to the planning phase of the mission,<br />
■ F2 – the planning phase,<br />
■ F3 – the training phase,<br />
■ F4 – the execution phase,<br />
■ F5 – the mission evaluation phase,<br />
• the recommendations creation date, writens in a suitable format (e.g. YYYY.<br />
MM.DD/2011.04.18),<br />
• place of issue (e.g. Pol<strong>and</strong>, Poznan),<br />
• originator of the recommendation,<br />
✓ rank, name <strong>and</strong> surname (e.g. Sgt. John Doe),<br />
✓ originating institution / organisational unit (e.g., the General Staff<br />
of Army / Department of Strategy <strong>and</strong> Defence Planning),<br />
• recipient (recipients) of recommendations:<br />
✓ Country / unit name (e.g. Afghanistan / 6 Logistic Base),<br />
✓ An institution / organisational unit (e.g., the General Staff of Army /<br />
Department of Strategy <strong>and</strong> Defence Planning),<br />
• a concise description (a few sentences of description what the recommendation<br />
refers to).<br />
General knowledge of the recommendation phase in the process of constnt<br />
learning at the stage of implementation manifests itself with specific problems<br />
which have a very complex structure <strong>and</strong> form an immense intellectual challenge.<br />
It seems obvious that organisations should benefit from processing the knowledge<br />
related to historical events. Such events should be well-documented <strong>and</strong> include<br />
both positive <strong>and</strong> negative aspects.<br />
IV. LL tool functions <strong>and</strong> architecture<br />
The SIMS LL tool is assumed to be used for effective gathering of observations,<br />
processing them <strong>and</strong> applying the results of this process within military structures.
Change language