Military Communications and Information Technology: A Trusted ...

236 Military Communications and Information Technology...
an algorithm that bases on information that would be received from an external
Network Monitoring Element.
There has been proven that the proposed AAO model is semantically and
syntactically correct and consistent. Reasoning over it provides the possibility to
support the adaptation actions decisions taking into account the user preferences
deriving from his role and limitations of his terminal. The SWRL rules defined for
AFRO strongly support the automatic process of defining the preferred actions.
The proposed adaptation mechanism gives promising effects for low level
commanders located at the battlefield, which can be supplied with information
generally available on high command levels which, up to now, were very rarely
distributed to tactical networks.
References
[1] J.A. Estefan, K. Laskey, F.G. McCabe, D. Thornton, Reference Architecture
Foundation for Service Oriented Architecture, Version 1.0, OASIS Committee Draft
02, 14 October 2009.
[2] M. Booth, T. Buckman et al, NATO Network Enabled Feasibility Study Volume II:
Detailed Report Covering a Strategy and Roadmap for Realizing an NNEC Networking
and Information Infrastructure, version 2.0”, NATO C3 Agency, June 2005.
[3] NATO Architecture Framework (NAF) version 3.0, June 2007.
[4] NATO C3 System Interoperability Directive (NID), AC/322-D(2004)0001(INV)
Annex C.
[5] J. Busch, An investigation into deploying web services, TN – 1229, NC3A, December
2007.
[6] R. Faucher, R. Ladysz, D. Miller, S. Musman, S. Raparla, D. Smith, Guidance on
Proxy Servers for the Tactical Edge, The MITRE Corporation, MITRE TECHNICAL
REPORT no. 060175, September 2006.
[7] M. Weiser, The computer for the 21st century, Scientific American, (1991), 265(3):
94-104.
[8] J.P. Sousa and D. Garlan, (2002). Aura: An architectural framework for user mobility
in ubiquitous computing environments, In Proceedings of 3rd IEEE/IFIP Conference
on Software Architecture.
[9] P.F. Patel-Schneider, I. Horrocks, OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and
Abstract Syntax Section 2. Abstract Syntax, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/
syntax.html
[10] Strang et al., A context modelling survey, Workshop On Advanced Context
Modelling, Reasoning And Management Associated With The Sixth International
Conference On Ubiquitous Computing (Ubicomp4), Nottingham/UK.
[11] I. Horrocks et al., SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language. Combining OWL and
RuleML, W3C Member Submission 21 May 2004, http://www.w3.org/Submission/
SWRL/