Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...

Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ... Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...

22.01.2015 Views

Page: 40 [160] Mr. Monty first met Mr. Bourgh in 1996 and learned of the proposal to build a mill in Watson Lake. He attended a meeting on April 18, 1996 with LPL and was involved in other meetings over the next 4 years. [161] Mr. Monty testified at length about the development of forest management plans, with an emphasis on the need for sustainability. He referred to a report that was prepared for the Department 2010 FC 495 (CanLII) in 1990 by Dendron Resource Surveys Ltd. called “Development of a Forest Management Plan of the Southeastern Yukon” (the “Dendron Report”). He also referred to Volume 1 of a “Forest Management Plan for Southeastern Yukon” prepared by Sterling Wood Group Inc., dated March 1991 (the “Draft Sterling Wood Report”). He testified that in his understanding, this plan was not approved. This document, entered as Exhibit D-81, Tab 3 was a draft document. [162] A final version of the “Forest Management Plan for Southeastern Yukon” prepared by Sterling Wood Group dated August 1991 (the “Final Sterling Wood Report”), consisting of three volumes, was entered as Exhibit P-38 in the course of Mr. Monty’s cross-examination. [163] Mr. Monty gave evidence about the meetings and correspondence that he had with both the Plaintiffs and other public servants. [164] Mr. Peter Henry was the next to testify on behalf of the Defendant. He is a graduate of the University of Toronto and holds a bachelor of science in forestry. He began working with DIAND in 1990 as an inventory technician. He looked at the Dendron Report when it was delivered to the

Page: 41 Department early in his term of employment. He also looked at the Sterling Wood Report but was unable to say if he had reviewed the draft report dated June 1991 or the final report dated August 1991. [165] Between May 1996 and May 1999, Mr. Henry held the position of inventory and planning forester. For a period of time, he held the position of acting head of forest management. 2010 FC 495 (CanLII) [166] In September – October 1997, Mr. Henry was instructed to prepare a timber supply analysis (“TSA”). He did so, relative to six FMUs across the southern Yukon from west to east. These FMUs were chosen because complete forest inventory information was available for them. Mr. Henry characterized a “timber supply analysis” as analytical work done to support a policy decision on which an annual allowable cut could be based. He completed his report in March 1998. [167] Mr. Henry testified extensively about the process by which he developed his TSA. His evidence provided a detailed explanation of the use of geomatic information systems, the development of inventory and the environmental, social and political considerations involved in this process. [168] Mr. Henry’s report was not a forest management plan (“FMP”). A FMP is a high level policy document. It is designed to balance, and implement controls over, the various social, environmental, economic and political factors that must be considered with respect to forest use.

Page: 41<br />

Department early in his term of employment. He also looked at the Sterling Wood Report but was<br />

unable to say if he had reviewed the draft report dated June 1991 or the final report dated August<br />

1991.<br />

[165] Between May 1996 and May 1999, Mr. Henry held the position of inventory and planning<br />

forester. For a period of time, he held the position of acting head of forest management.<br />

2010 FC 495 (CanLII)<br />

[166] In September – October 1997, Mr. Henry was instructed to prepare a timber supply analysis<br />

(“TSA”). He did so, relative to six FMUs across the southern Yukon from west to east. These<br />

FMUs were chosen because complete forest inventory information was available for them. Mr.<br />

Henry characterized a “timber supply analysis” as analytical work done to support a policy decision<br />

on which an annual allowable cut could be based. He completed his report in March 1998.<br />

[167] Mr. Henry testified extensively about the process by which he developed his TSA. His<br />

evidence provided a detailed explanation of the use of geomatic information systems, the<br />

development of inventory and the environmental, social and political considerations involved in this<br />

process.<br />

[168] Mr. Henry’s report was not a forest management plan (“FMP”). A FMP is a high level<br />

policy document. It is designed to balance, and implement controls over, the various social,<br />

environmental, economic and political factors that must be considered with respect to forest use.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!