Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...
Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ... Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...
INDEX Paragraph Numbers I. PREAMBLE 1-6 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 7-27 III. EVIDENCE 2010 FC 495 (CanLII) A. General 28-36 B. The Plaintiffs’ Witnesses 37-127 C. The Defendant’s Witnesses 128-195 IV. “THE LAY OF THE LAND”: CONTEXT 196-254 V. WHAT HAPPENED: A CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS A. 1995 255-258 B. 1996 259-310 C. 1997 311-340 D. 1998 341-383 E. 1999 384-452 F. 2000 453-528 G. 2001 529-559 VI. DISCUSSION A. Introduction 560-566
Page: ii B. Preliminary Issues 567-602 (i) Nature of the Proceeding 603-604 (ii) Burden of Proof 605-609 C. Credibility Assessment (i) General 610-611 (ii) Plaintiffs’ Witnesses 612-622 2010 FC 495 (CanLII) (iii) Defendant’s Witnesses 623-644 D. The Causes of Action 645-650 1.Negligence 651 (i) Is there a Duty of Care 652-662 (a) Proximity 663-718 (b) Foreseeability of Harm 719-733 (c) Conclusion on Prima Facie Duty of Care 734-738 (ii) Policy Considerations 739-766 (a) Bad Faith 767-818 (b) Conclusion on Duty of Care 819-820 (iii) Breach of the Standard of Care 821-848 (a) Foreseeable Harm 849-852 (b) Causation 853-895 (c) Contributory Negligence 896-927 (d) Conclusion on Negligence 928 2. Negligent Misrepresentation 929-930
- Page 341 and 342: Page: 341 [1286] Mr. Van Leeuwen, i
- Page 343 and 344: Page: 343 a secure timber supply, t
- Page 345 and 346: Page: 345 A. Definitely. Because, a
- Page 347 and 348: Page: 347 [1309] The Defendant cros
- Page 349 and 350: Page: 349 [1317] As well, the Defen
- Page 351 and 352: Page: 351 To this end, not only sho
- Page 353 and 354: Page: 353 [1331] The Defendant has
- Page 355 and 356: Page: 355 8. Interest [1340] The Pl
- Page 357 and 358: Page: 357 arising in that province.
- Page 359 and 360: Page: 359 Post-judgment interest 36
- Page 361 and 362: Page: 361 [1350] Similarly, the Cou
- Page 363 and 364: Page: 363 [1360] Counsel for both p
- Page 365 and 366: Page: 365 [1367] However, two of th
- Page 367 and 368: Page: 367 Development pursuant to c
- Page 369 and 370: Page: 369 were granted by the Plain
- Page 371 and 372: Page: 371 [1385] The Defendant’s
- Page 373 and 374: Page: 373 [1394] There were many wi
- Page 375 and 376: Page: 375 Q And you knew there was
- Page 377 and 378: Page: 377 Now does that generally a
- Page 379 and 380: Page: 379 discovery examination of
- Page 381 and 382: Page: 381 submissions. In terms - -
- Page 383 and 384: Page: 383 [1412] On April 14, day 1
- Page 385 and 386: Page: 385 content and expect it to
- Page 387 and 388: Page: 387 VII. CONCLUSION [1420] At
- Page 389 and 390: Page: 389 [1432] The commitment, ot
- Page 391: Page: 391 [1443] At the end of the
- Page 395 and 396: Page: iv (ii) Legal Principles 1181
- Page 397: Page: 2 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Benne
INDEX<br />
Paragraph Numbers<br />
I. PREAMBLE 1-6<br />
II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 7-27<br />
III. EVIDENCE<br />
2010 FC 495 (CanLII)<br />
A. General 28-36<br />
B. The Plaintiffs’ Witnesses 37-127<br />
C. The Defendant’s Witnesses 128-195<br />
IV. “THE LAY OF THE LAND”: CONTEXT 196-254<br />
V. WHAT HAPPENED: A CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS<br />
A. 1995 255-258<br />
B. 1996 259-310<br />
C. 1997 311-340<br />
D. 1998 341-383<br />
E. 1999 384-452<br />
F. 2000 453-528<br />
G. 2001 529-559<br />
VI.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
A. Introduction 560-566
Change language