22.01.2015 Views

Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...

Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...

Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Page: 385<br />

content and expect it to be one sided. Secondly I’m going to quote<br />

from Mr. Whittle’s submission at page 795 of the transcript.<br />

JUSTICE: Do I need it or I just make a note of the page I mean,<br />

I have these books too, but you read it to me.<br />

MR. SALI:<br />

Yes. I’ll just - - but it’s a one-sentence submission,<br />

“And we submit that every document in that binder is<br />

true and accurate and admitted as such by the<br />

plaintiffs.”<br />

2010 FC 495 (CanLII)<br />

[1416] In closing submissions, Counsel for the Defendant made the following comments, at page<br />

5895 and 5896 of the transcript, about Exhibit D-11:<br />

MR. FLORENCE: I’d like to briefly address Exhibit D-11. I<br />

briefly put the defendant’s position before the court on June 25 th ,<br />

during Mr. Sali’s cross-examination of Terry Sewell. That’s found in<br />

volume 25, page 4317, lines 11 to 24. I don’t wish to read that back<br />

to the court at this time. I wish to repeat our position.<br />

It’s the defendant’s position that these documents were entered as an<br />

exhibit on April 3 rd , during the cross-examination of Mr. Bourgh.<br />

Page 798, volume 4, transcript, Your Ladyship stated at lines 11 to<br />

28, I’m not going to read the whole part.<br />

“…It is my understanding that as a matter of law, an<br />

admission of that kind, made in the discover process,<br />

is binding on the plaintiff right now for the purpose of<br />

this trial, and that will be just and expedient and in the<br />

interests of justice to have these documents admitted<br />

right now as an exhibit, because they have not been<br />

contested by the plaintiffs, and obviously the<br />

plaintiffs having admitted them cannot now contest<br />

them.”<br />

It was intention of the defendant these documents go in as an exhibit<br />

for that purpose. It was not the defendant’s position that the<br />

defendant was admitting the proof of the truth of the contents of<br />

these document, merely that the plaintiffs had admitted it. In<br />

addition, as you can see from the evidence of the defendant’s<br />

witnesses, not one of them admitted making a promise or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!