- Page 1 and 2: Federal Court Cour fédérale Date:
- Page 3 and 4: Page: 3 [7] This action was commenc
- Page 5 and 6: Page: 5 [16] On August 25, 2004, th
- Page 7 and 8: Page: 7 the appellant to serve and
- Page 9 and 10: Page: 9 [30] Both parties have subm
- Page 11 and 12: Page: 11 these documents for the tr
- Page 13 and 14: Page: 13 [42] Mr. Sewell provided g
- Page 15 and 16: Page: 15 [52] Mr. Leonard Bourgh wa
- Page 17 and 18: Page: 17 [62] Mr. Gurney operated a
- Page 19 and 20: Page: 19 [72] Mr. Brian Kerr was th
- Page 21 and 22: Page: 21 [81] In brief, as Woodland
- Page 23 and 24: Page: 23 with the LPL group; he rem
- Page 25 and 26: Page: 25 [97] Mr. Spencer also test
- Page 27 and 28: Page: 27 Keith Spencer on a regular
- Page 29 and 30: Page: 29 addressed meetings with DI
- Page 31: Page: 31 publications and a summary
- Page 35 and 36: Page: 35 Assessment Act, S.C. 1992,
- Page 37 and 38: Page: 37 [147] In his position as t
- Page 39 and 40: Page: 39 [156] Mr. Fillmore also ga
- Page 41 and 42: Page: 41 Department early in his te
- Page 43 and 44: Page: 43 Report for Forest Manageme
- Page 45 and 46: Page: 45 with no particular respons
- Page 47 and 48: Page: 47 [192] Mr. Sewell testified
- Page 49 and 50: Page: 49 4. The powers, duties and
- Page 51 and 52: Page: 51 [205] In the introduction,
- Page 53 and 54: Page: 53 activity occurs. The total
- Page 55 and 56: Page: 55 any person or class of per
- Page 57 and 58: Page: 57 [225] In protest over the
- Page 59 and 60: Page: 59 described the LPL project
- Page 61 and 62: Page: 61 [238] The RIAS also explai
- Page 63 and 64: Page: 63 [246] For the sake of clar
- Page 65 and 66: Page: 65 [254] This was the context
- Page 67 and 68: Page: 67 [263] By 1996, according t
- Page 69 and 70: Page: 69 [270] Following the April
- Page 71 and 72: Page: 71 require 200,000 m 3 of tim
- Page 73 and 74: Page: 73 June 4, 1996. In his lette
- Page 75 and 76: Page: 75 [294] Mr. Ivanksi testifie
- Page 77 and 78: Page: 77 [303] This proposed invest
- Page 79 and 80: Page: 79 C. 1997 [311] In late 1996
- Page 81 and 82: Page: 81 Watson Lake area. I unders
- Page 83 and 84:
Page: 83 [326] This report, prepare
- Page 85 and 86:
Page: 85 [332] As previously noted,
- Page 87 and 88:
Page: 87 D. 1998 [341] The first jo
- Page 89 and 90:
Page: 89 [349] Mr. Henry explained,
- Page 91 and 92:
Page: 91 It seems the goal of havin
- Page 93 and 94:
Page: 93 [365] The Plaintiffs were
- Page 95 and 96:
Page: 95 remained on the site for s
- Page 97 and 98:
Page: 97 evidence, which is consist
- Page 99 and 100:
Page: 99 [389] A meeting was held o
- Page 101 and 102:
Page: 101 [396] These documents wer
- Page 103 and 104:
Page: 103 location under a future C
- Page 105 and 106:
Page: 105 [414] A briefing note, da
- Page 107 and 108:
Page: 107 to shut down operations i
- Page 109 and 110:
Page: 109 continuing delays by DIAN
- Page 111 and 112:
Page: 111 [439] On October 1, 1999,
- Page 113 and 114:
Page: 113 [447] In October 1999, DI
- Page 115 and 116:
Page: 115 regulations would impleme
- Page 117 and 118:
Page: 117 [464] There was another m
- Page 119 and 120:
Page: 119 [472] Mr. Ballantyne, the
- Page 121 and 122:
Page: 121 [482] However, there is a
- Page 123 and 124:
Page: 123 [488] I note that on the
- Page 125 and 126:
Page: 125 [498] Mr. Ballantyne said
- Page 127 and 128:
Page: 127 [508] SYFC had announced
- Page 129 and 130:
Page: 129 [516] The closure of the
- Page 131 and 132:
Page: 131 [523] The Hyland-Coal THA
- Page 133 and 134:
Page: 133 [531] As mentioned earlie
- Page 135 and 136:
Page: 135 explained to YCS that the
- Page 137 and 138:
Page: 137 [543] At this time the jo
- Page 139 and 140:
Page: 139 without the promised timb
- Page 141 and 142:
Page: 141 479 In some respects coun
- Page 143 and 144:
Page: 143 B. Preliminary Issues [56
- Page 145 and 146:
Page: 145 of action arising in that
- Page 147 and 148:
Page: 147 [577] In responding to th
- Page 149 and 150:
Page: 149 The plaintiff shall serve
- Page 151 and 152:
Page: 151 20 For the reasons expres
- Page 153 and 154:
Page: 153 [598] Both the Plaintiffs
- Page 155 and 156:
Page: 155 … Liability for acts of
- Page 157 and 158:
Page: 157 from the evidence, and if
- Page 159 and 160:
Page: 159 [616] Mr. Gurney is an un
- Page 161 and 162:
Page: 161 Q. Did you understand the
- Page 163 and 164:
Page: 163 [633] Mr. Madill was anot
- Page 165 and 166:
Page: 165 [643] Having regard to th
- Page 167 and 168:
Page: 167 [653] In Design Services
- Page 169 and 170:
Page: 169 [660] In Childs v. Desorm
- Page 171 and 172:
Page: 171 [668] This reliance by th
- Page 173 and 174:
Page: 173 [674] Similarly, the Defe
- Page 175 and 176:
Page: 175 we would be interested in
- Page 177 and 178:
Page: 177 happy with this decision)
- Page 179 and 180:
Page: 179 [703] This high unemploym
- Page 181 and 182:
Page: 181 [711] I also note that th
- Page 183 and 184:
Page: 183 [718] This is not the cas
- Page 185 and 186:
Page: 185 [726] In my opinion, the
- Page 187 and 188:
Page: 187 [732] Similarly, Mr. Loek
- Page 189 and 190:
Page: 189 [741] There is no doubt t
- Page 191 and 192:
Page: 191 Department employed a loc
- Page 193 and 194:
Page: 193 duty of care and that the
- Page 195 and 196:
Page: 195 inordinate delay, that in
- Page 197 and 198:
Page: 197 industry need, promises m
- Page 199 and 200:
Page: 199 … Industry is not stupi
- Page 201 and 202:
Page: 201 offered by Mr. Fillmore i
- Page 203 and 204:
Page: 203 • Uncertainties associa
- Page 205 and 206:
Page: 205 available sustainable tim
- Page 207 and 208:
Page: 207 [787] On August 9, 2000,
- Page 209 and 210:
Page: 209 [796] On the basis of the
- Page 211 and 212:
Page: 211 [805] In preparation for
- Page 213 and 214:
Page: 213 [810] This is an extraord
- Page 215 and 216:
Page: 215 inferences, to be sure, c
- Page 217 and 218:
Page: 217 occurrences but occurred
- Page 219 and 220:
Page: 219 [831] Of particular impor
- Page 221 and 222:
Page: 221 [840] Mr. Madill appeared
- Page 223 and 224:
Page: 223 evidence of the Defendant
- Page 225 and 226:
Page: 225 an inference of causation
- Page 227 and 228:
Page: 227 [860] The Defendant drew
- Page 229 and 230:
Page: 229 [869] This conduct, inclu
- Page 231 and 232:
Page: 231 [878] In the result, I fi
- Page 233 and 234:
Page: 233 [887] Unfortunately, for
- Page 235 and 236:
Page: 235 [897] As I understand the
- Page 237 and 238:
Page: 237 [905] Throughout 1998, th
- Page 239 and 240:
Page: 239 James Moore. That meeting
- Page 241 and 242:
Page: 241 391605 B.C. Ltd. was give
- Page 243 and 244:
Page: 243 (3) The representor must
- Page 245 and 246:
Page: 245 [932] For the reasons not
- Page 247 and 248:
Page: 247 proposed mill project. Mr
- Page 249 and 250:
Page: 249 [949] Mr. Fehr’s eviden
- Page 251 and 252:
Page: 251 commitments and they’ve
- Page 253 and 254:
Page: 253 observations of his manne
- Page 255 and 256:
Page: 255 [973] As well, the fact t
- Page 257 and 258:
Page: 257 all of its commitments. T
- Page 259 and 260:
Page: 259 JUSTICE: Mr. Nault is not
- Page 261 and 262:
Page: 261 [996] Moreover, the evide
- Page 263 and 264:
Page: 263 (b) Was the representatio
- Page 265 and 266:
Page: 265 Thus, where an advising p
- Page 267 and 268:
Page: 267 Q. And you understood tho
- Page 269 and 270:
Page: 269 considering the balance o
- Page 271 and 272:
Page: 271 was withheld addressed th
- Page 273 and 274:
Page: 273 [1037] Was that reliance
- Page 275 and 276:
Page: 275 build a mill was consider
- Page 277 and 278:
Page: 277 [1052] As a result, I fin
- Page 279 and 280:
Page: 279 servants. That was a subj
- Page 281 and 282:
Page: 281 [1068] As I understand th
- Page 283 and 284:
Page: 283 contract. Liability can a
- Page 285 and 286:
Page: 285 [1084] Mr. Alan Kerr and
- Page 287 and 288:
Page: 287 [1093] Given the nature o
- Page 289 and 290:
Page: 289 [1096] The Plaintiffs sub
- Page 291 and 292:
Page: 291 decision in Daulia Ltd. v
- Page 293 and 294:
Page: 293 which are commonly endeav
- Page 295 and 296:
Page: 295 [1115] The Defendant reli
- Page 297 and 298:
Page: 297 [1123] With respect to th
- Page 299 and 300:
Page: 299 adequate supply of timber
- Page 301 and 302:
Page: 301 In the circumstances of t
- Page 303 and 304:
Page: 303 4. Breach of Fiduciary Du
- Page 305 and 306:
Page: 305 place the Crown in the un
- Page 307 and 308:
Page: 307 to injure the plaintiff.
- Page 309 and 310:
Page: 309 There are no special dama
- Page 311 and 312:
Page: 311 two, which I propose to p
- Page 313 and 314:
Page: 313 MR. WHITTLE: I am satisfi
- Page 315 and 316:
Page: 315 items thereof may be inac
- Page 317 and 318:
Page: 317 [1188] It is not disputed
- Page 319 and 320:
Page: 319 …The difficulty in fixi
- Page 321 and 322:
Page: 321 [1202] In closing argumen
- Page 323 and 324:
Page: 323 opinion testimony on the
- Page 325 and 326:
Page: 325 that it “came directly
- Page 327 and 328:
Page: 327 [1228] Mr. Van Leeuwen sa
- Page 329 and 330:
Page: 329 company would have been g
- Page 331 and 332:
Page: 331 diesel and the actual pri
- Page 333 and 334:
Page: 333 the weight to be given to
- Page 335 and 336:
Page: 335 [1262] Mr. Van Leeuwen pr
- Page 337 and 338:
Page: 337 reasonable. The estimatio
- Page 339 and 340:
Page: 339 [1280] In cross-examinati
- Page 341 and 342:
Page: 341 [1286] Mr. Van Leeuwen, i
- Page 343 and 344:
Page: 343 a secure timber supply, t
- Page 345 and 346:
Page: 345 A. Definitely. Because, a
- Page 347 and 348:
Page: 347 [1309] The Defendant cros
- Page 349 and 350:
Page: 349 [1317] As well, the Defen
- Page 351 and 352:
Page: 351 To this end, not only sho
- Page 353 and 354:
Page: 353 [1331] The Defendant has
- Page 355 and 356:
Page: 355 8. Interest [1340] The Pl
- Page 357 and 358:
Page: 357 arising in that province.
- Page 359 and 360:
Page: 359 Post-judgment interest 36
- Page 361 and 362:
Page: 361 [1350] Similarly, the Cou
- Page 363 and 364:
Page: 363 [1360] Counsel for both p
- Page 365 and 366:
Page: 365 [1367] However, two of th
- Page 367 and 368:
Page: 367 Development pursuant to c
- Page 369 and 370:
Page: 369 were granted by the Plain
- Page 371 and 372:
Page: 371 [1385] The Defendant’s
- Page 373 and 374:
Page: 373 [1394] There were many wi
- Page 375 and 376:
Page: 375 Q And you knew there was
- Page 377 and 378:
Page: 377 Now does that generally a
- Page 379 and 380:
Page: 379 discovery examination of
- Page 381 and 382:
Page: 381 submissions. In terms - -
- Page 383 and 384:
Page: 383 [1412] On April 14, day 1
- Page 385 and 386:
Page: 385 content and expect it to
- Page 387 and 388:
Page: 387 VII. CONCLUSION [1420] At
- Page 389 and 390:
Page: 389 [1432] The commitment, ot
- Page 391 and 392:
Page: 391 [1443] At the end of the
- Page 393 and 394:
Page: ii B. Preliminary Issues 567-
- Page 395 and 396:
Page: iv (ii) Legal Principles 1181
- Page 397:
Page: 2 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Benne