Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...

Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ... Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...

22.01.2015 Views

Page: 314 MR. WHITTLE: Secondly, the exhibit that is contained in the 24 boxes was, as the four counsel understand, agreed to be entered on July 4 th after the plaintiffs had closed their case, and Mr. Florence and I, again last evening discussing this, realized that that was the purpose for which the agreement was made. We did have the opportunity to review all of those documents when they were in Mr. Sali’s room over the course of the trial and we had the full opportunity to review those for the purposes of cross-examining Mr. Kerr when he took the stand for the second time to testify to damages. I appreciate the court wishes us to look to the transcript to find those references. If it pleases the court, all four counsel are agreed that that was the opportunity that was provided to me, that that opportunity was not taken when Mr. Kerr took the witness stand. However, we still are in the court’s hands as to whether you wish us to go back to the transcript and to find those entries. But as far as I am concerned as counsel, I had that opportunity if I wanted to take it. 2010 FC 495 (CanLII) JUSTICE: Thank you for that clarification and it’s on the record that the Crown had the opportunity to cross-examine Mr. Kerr with respect to those documents and did not do so. So that being so, it is not necessary to go back and find the specific references. [1178] Contained within the record are financial statements that were prepared for the Plaintiffs. These financial statements were the subject of an agreement between counsel for the parties. That agreement was filed at the hearing on May 6, 2008. That agreement, signed by Mr. Sali, Q.C. of Counsel for the Plaintiffs and Mr. G. Malcolm Florence of Counsel for the Defendant, provides as follows: SYFC v. THE QUEEN – AGREEMENT AS TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Each of the financial statements prepared for LPL and SYFC for the years 1996 through 2003 inclusive (both audited and unaudited) is deemed to be authentic. Further, it is agreed that they accurately reflect the assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses of the companies as stated. However, the description of some of the various

Page: 315 items thereof may be inaccurate, although the corresponding amount listed is accurate. [1179] It was further understood that the Defendant is not admitting that any of the expenses or losses set out in the financial statement constitute damages in the event of a finding of liability against the Defendant. 2010 FC 495 (CanLII) [1180] As well, a summary of the financial statements was placed on the record. This summary was provided to the Court by the Plaintiffs, with the agreement of the Defendant. (ii) Legal Principles [1181] Turning now to the heart of the matter, the basis for awarding damages in cases of both tort, including the tort of negligent misrepresentations, and for breach of contract is to compensate the injured party for losses flowing from the negligent act or the breach of contract, as the case may be. [1182] The Plaintiffs have suffered an injury and are entitled to compensation. I agree with their submissions that given the nature of their enterprise and the causes of action upon which they have succeeded, it is not necessary to attribute those damages to a specific cause of action. [1183] In Central Trust Co. v. Rafuse, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 147, the Supreme Court of Canada held that concurrent or alternative liability in contract and tort will not be permitted where the duty of care arises from the terms of the contract. I am satisfied in this case that the Plaintiffs have established a duty of care that arises independent of their contractual relationship with the Defendant. As such, I

Page: 315<br />

items thereof may be inaccurate, although the corresponding amount<br />

listed is accurate.<br />

[1179] It was further understood that the Defendant is not admitting that any of the expenses or<br />

losses set out in the financial statement constitute damages in the event of a finding of liability<br />

against the Defendant.<br />

2010 FC 495 (CanLII)<br />

[1180] As well, a summary of the financial statements was placed on the record. This summary was<br />

provided to the <strong>Court</strong> by the Plaintiffs, with the agreement of the Defendant.<br />

(ii)<br />

Legal Principles<br />

[1181] Turning now to the heart of the matter, the basis for awarding damages in cases of both tort,<br />

including the tort of negligent misrepresentations, and for breach of contract is to compensate the<br />

injured party for losses flowing from the negligent act or the breach of contract, as the case may be.<br />

[1182] The Plaintiffs have suffered an injury and are entitled to compensation. I agree with their<br />

submissions that given the nature of their enterprise and the causes of action upon which they have<br />

succeeded, it is not necessary to attribute those damages to a specific cause of action.<br />

[1183] In Central Trust Co. v. Rafuse, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 147, the Supreme <strong>Court</strong> of Canada held that<br />

concurrent or alternative liability in contract and tort will not be permitted where the duty of care<br />

arises from the terms of the contract. I am satisfied in this case that the Plaintiffs have established a<br />

duty of care that arises independent of their contractual relationship with the Defendant. As such, I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!