22.01.2015 Views

Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...

Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...

Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Page: 314<br />

MR. WHITTLE: Secondly, the exhibit that is contained in the<br />

24 boxes was, as the four counsel understand, agreed to be entered<br />

on July 4 th after the plaintiffs had closed their case, and Mr. Florence<br />

and I, again last evening discussing this, realized that that was the<br />

purpose for which the agreement was made. We did have the<br />

opportunity to review all of those documents when they were in Mr.<br />

Sali’s room over the course of the trial and we had the full<br />

opportunity to review those for the purposes of cross-examining Mr.<br />

Kerr when he took the stand for the second time to testify to<br />

damages.<br />

I appreciate the court wishes us to look to the transcript to find those<br />

references. If it pleases the court, all four counsel are agreed that that<br />

was the opportunity that was provided to me, that that opportunity<br />

was not taken when Mr. Kerr took the witness stand. However, we<br />

still are in the court’s hands as to whether you wish us to go back to<br />

the transcript and to find those entries. But as far as I am concerned<br />

as counsel, I had that opportunity if I wanted to take it.<br />

2010 FC 495 (CanLII)<br />

JUSTICE: Thank you for that clarification and it’s on the record<br />

that the Crown had the opportunity to cross-examine Mr. Kerr with<br />

respect to those documents and did not do so. So that being so, it is<br />

not necessary to go back and find the specific references.<br />

[1178] Contained within the record are financial statements that were prepared for the Plaintiffs.<br />

These financial statements were the subject of an agreement between counsel for the parties. That<br />

agreement was filed at the hearing on May 6, 2008. That agreement, signed by Mr. Sali, Q.C. of<br />

Counsel for the Plaintiffs and Mr. G. Malcolm Florence of Counsel for the Defendant, provides as<br />

follows:<br />

SYFC v. THE QUEEN – AGREEMENT AS TO FINANCIAL<br />

STATEMENTS<br />

Each of the financial statements prepared for LPL and SYFC for the<br />

years 1996 through 2003 inclusive (both audited and unaudited) is<br />

deemed to be authentic. Further, it is agreed that they accurately<br />

reflect the assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses of the<br />

companies as stated. However, the description of some of the various

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!