Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...

Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ... Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...

22.01.2015 Views

Page: 290 [1101] In 1996, the LFN had been granted a THA in approximately six months. This included an OIC. [1102] There was a meeting between the YFIA and DIAND, including Minister Nault, on May 20, 2000. At the May 20 th meeting, Minister Nault characterized the industry’s difficulties in accessing a long term adequate supply of timber as a “little hurdle”. SYFC was represented at this meeting; 2010 FC 495 (CanLII) see Exhibit P-79, Tab 282. [1103] In any event, it is my opinion that the absence of an OIC is not fatal to the Plaintiffs’ cause of action for breach of contract and I so find. [1104] The Defendant complains that there is no consideration for the alleged contract. I disagree. [1105] In the case of this unilateral contract, the “consideration” was the construction of the mill. As explained by the Supreme Court of Canada, in Sail Labrador, at para. 33: …a unilateral contract is a contract in which only one party undertakes a promise. This promise takes the form of an offer which can only be accepted by performance of the required act or forbearance. Such performance provides the other party's consideration, allowing it to enforce the original promise (Treitel, at pp. 35-36; Waddams, at p. 111; United Dominions Trust (Commercial), Ltd. v. Eagle Aircraft Services, Ltd., [1968] 1 All E.R. 104 (C.A.)). [1106] The construction of the mill is the event which provided the consideration to the Defendant and led to the crystallization of the unilateral contract. In support of this finding I refer to the

Page: 291 decision in Daulia Ltd. v. Four Millbank Nominees Ltd., [1978] 2 All E.R. 557 (C.A.), at 560 to 561 as follows: The concept of a unilateral or ‘if’ contract is somewhat anomalous, because it is clear that, at all events until the offeree starts to perform the condition, there is no contract at all, but merely an offer which the offeror is free to revoke. Doubts have been expressed whether the offeror becomes bound so soon as the offeree starts to perform or satisfy the condition, or only when he has fully done so. In my judgment, however, we are not concerned in this case with any such problem, because in my view the plaintiffs had fully performed or satisfied the condition when they presented themselves at the time and place appointed with a banker’s draft for the deposit and their part of the written contract for sale duly engrossed and signed, and the retendered the same, which I understood to mean proferred it for exchange. Actual exchange, which never took place, would not in my view have been part of the satisfaction of the condition but something additional which was inherently necessary to be done by the plaintiffs to enable, not to bind, the defendants to perform the unilateral contract. 2010 FC 495 (CanLII) Accordingly in my judgment, the answer to the first question must be in the affirmative. Even if my reasoning so far be wrong the conclusion in my view is still the same for the following reasons. Whilst I think the true view of a unilateral contract must in general be that the offeror is entitled to require full performance of the condition which he has imposed and short of that he is not bound, that must be subject to one important qualification, which stems from the fact that there must be an implied obligation on the part of the offeror not to prevent the condition becoming satisfied, which obligation it seems to me must arise as soon as the offeree starts to perform. Until then the offeror can revoke the whole thing, but once the offeree has embarked on performance it is too late for the offeror to revoke his offer. [1107] The benefits of the mill were not meant to be one-sided. Employment would be provided as local woodsmen would have the opportunity to engage in the timber industry in accordance with the regulations that required 60 percent of all timber cut in Yukon to be processed there, before one log

Page: 291<br />

decision in Daulia Ltd. v. Four Millbank Nominees Ltd., [1978] 2 All E.R. 557 (C.A.), at 560 to 561<br />

as follows:<br />

The concept of a unilateral or ‘if’ contract is somewhat anomalous,<br />

because it is clear that, at all events until the offeree starts to perform<br />

the condition, there is no contract at all, but merely an offer which<br />

the offeror is free to revoke. Doubts have been expressed whether the<br />

offeror becomes bound so soon as the offeree starts to perform or<br />

satisfy the condition, or only when he has fully done so. In my<br />

judgment, however, we are not concerned in this case with any such<br />

problem, because in my view the plaintiffs had fully performed or<br />

satisfied the condition when they presented themselves at the time<br />

and place appointed with a banker’s draft for the deposit and their<br />

part of the written contract for sale duly engrossed and signed, and<br />

the retendered the same, which I understood to mean proferred it for<br />

exchange. Actual exchange, which never took place, would not in<br />

my view have been part of the satisfaction of the condition but<br />

something additional which was inherently necessary to be done by<br />

the plaintiffs to enable, not to bind, the defendants to perform the<br />

unilateral contract.<br />

2010 FC 495 (CanLII)<br />

Accordingly in my judgment, the answer to the first question must be<br />

in the affirmative.<br />

Even if my reasoning so far be wrong the conclusion in my view is<br />

still the same for the following reasons. Whilst I think the true view<br />

of a unilateral contract must in general be that the offeror is entitled<br />

to require full performance of the condition which he has imposed<br />

and short of that he is not bound, that must be subject to one<br />

important qualification, which stems from the fact that there must be<br />

an implied obligation on the part of the offeror not to prevent the<br />

condition becoming satisfied, which obligation it seems to me must<br />

arise as soon as the offeree starts to perform. Until then the offeror<br />

can revoke the whole thing, but once the offeree has embarked on<br />

performance it is too late for the offeror to revoke his offer.<br />

[1107] The benefits of the mill were not meant to be one-sided. Employment would be provided as<br />

local woodsmen would have the opportunity to engage in the timber industry in accordance with the<br />

regulations that required 60 percent of all timber cut in Yukon to be processed there, before one log

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!