Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...
Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ... Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...
Page: 284 4, 1996 and Minister Irwin on March 13, 1997 cannot, and do not, provide a basis for finding a contract. [1080] The Defendant focuses on the absence of a THA and argues that without this agreement, the Plaintiffs’ plea of contract is fatally wounded. 2010 FC 495 (CanLII) [1081] The Plaintiffs are not asserting that there was a contract with the Defendant that a THA would be granted. They advance a cause of action that is available to them on the basis of the known facts and the evidence submitted in the trial of this matter. [1082] The Plaintiffs, beginning with LPL in 1996, approached the agents and employees of the Defendant with inquiries about getting access to wood to supply a mill to be built in Watson Lake. The initial overtures in 1996 led to the introduction of Mr. Brian Kerr to members of the B.I.D. Group who are based in Vanderhoof, British Columbia. That introduction occurred in late 1996 to early 1997. In July 1997, Mr. Spencer and Mr. Fehr of the B.I.D. Group travelled to Whitehorse for a meeting with representatives of DIAND. Mr. Alan Kerr and Mr. Brian Kerr attended that meeting as well, on behalf of LPL. [1083] Mr. Spencer and Mr. Fehr testified that as a result of that meeting, they were satisfied that the Defendant had committed to provide an adequate supply of timber if the mill were built.
Page: 285 [1084] Mr. Alan Kerr and Mr. Brian Kerr, representatives of LPL, also testified that they understood that the Defendant had committed to providing the wood that was required to operate the mill. [1085] On the basis of that representation, LPL decided to move ahead, in a joint venture, where SYFC was chosen as the operating entity of the joint venture. The Plaintiffs built the mill in 1997 2010 FC 495 (CanLII) and 1998, and it first began operating in October 1998. [1086] The starting point in dealing with the issue of a contract is, once more, the relationship between the parties. The Defendant was the custodian of the forest resources in southeast Yukon and the Plaintiffs were private corporate citizens with an interest in pursuing business interests in that region, involving the construction and operation of a mill that would provide employment in an area with chronically high levels of unemployment and that would allow the policies embodied in the regulation regarding the 60/40 Rule, to work, also contributing to employment for woodsmen and loggers. There was an alignment of interests. [1087] As I have earlier found, the Defendant made a representation to LPL at the “due diligence” meeting on July 15, 1997. In brief, there was a representation that “if you build a mill, we will give you timber”. This representation contains the implied representations that there was an existing commitment to provide a long-term adequate volume of timber to whoever built a mill in southeast Yukon, together with the ability to provide the timber.
- Page 233 and 234: Page: 233 [887] Unfortunately, for
- Page 235 and 236: Page: 235 [897] As I understand the
- Page 237 and 238: Page: 237 [905] Throughout 1998, th
- Page 239 and 240: Page: 239 James Moore. That meeting
- Page 241 and 242: Page: 241 391605 B.C. Ltd. was give
- Page 243 and 244: Page: 243 (3) The representor must
- Page 245 and 246: Page: 245 [932] For the reasons not
- Page 247 and 248: Page: 247 proposed mill project. Mr
- Page 249 and 250: Page: 249 [949] Mr. Fehr’s eviden
- Page 251 and 252: Page: 251 commitments and they’ve
- Page 253 and 254: Page: 253 observations of his manne
- Page 255 and 256: Page: 255 [973] As well, the fact t
- Page 257 and 258: Page: 257 all of its commitments. T
- Page 259 and 260: Page: 259 JUSTICE: Mr. Nault is not
- Page 261 and 262: Page: 261 [996] Moreover, the evide
- Page 263 and 264: Page: 263 (b) Was the representatio
- Page 265 and 266: Page: 265 Thus, where an advising p
- Page 267 and 268: Page: 267 Q. And you understood tho
- Page 269 and 270: Page: 269 considering the balance o
- Page 271 and 272: Page: 271 was withheld addressed th
- Page 273 and 274: Page: 273 [1037] Was that reliance
- Page 275 and 276: Page: 275 build a mill was consider
- Page 277 and 278: Page: 277 [1052] As a result, I fin
- Page 279 and 280: Page: 279 servants. That was a subj
- Page 281 and 282: Page: 281 [1068] As I understand th
- Page 283: Page: 283 contract. Liability can a
- Page 287 and 288: Page: 287 [1093] Given the nature o
- Page 289 and 290: Page: 289 [1096] The Plaintiffs sub
- Page 291 and 292: Page: 291 decision in Daulia Ltd. v
- Page 293 and 294: Page: 293 which are commonly endeav
- Page 295 and 296: Page: 295 [1115] The Defendant reli
- Page 297 and 298: Page: 297 [1123] With respect to th
- Page 299 and 300: Page: 299 adequate supply of timber
- Page 301 and 302: Page: 301 In the circumstances of t
- Page 303 and 304: Page: 303 4. Breach of Fiduciary Du
- Page 305 and 306: Page: 305 place the Crown in the un
- Page 307 and 308: Page: 307 to injure the plaintiff.
- Page 309 and 310: Page: 309 There are no special dama
- Page 311 and 312: Page: 311 two, which I propose to p
- Page 313 and 314: Page: 313 MR. WHITTLE: I am satisfi
- Page 315 and 316: Page: 315 items thereof may be inac
- Page 317 and 318: Page: 317 [1188] It is not disputed
- Page 319 and 320: Page: 319 …The difficulty in fixi
- Page 321 and 322: Page: 321 [1202] In closing argumen
- Page 323 and 324: Page: 323 opinion testimony on the
- Page 325 and 326: Page: 325 that it “came directly
- Page 327 and 328: Page: 327 [1228] Mr. Van Leeuwen sa
- Page 329 and 330: Page: 329 company would have been g
- Page 331 and 332: Page: 331 diesel and the actual pri
- Page 333 and 334: Page: 333 the weight to be given to
Page: 284<br />
4, 1996 and Minister Irwin on March 13, 1997 cannot, and do not, provide a basis for finding a<br />
contract.<br />
[1080] The Defendant focuses on the absence of a THA and argues that without this agreement, the<br />
Plaintiffs’ plea of contract is fatally wounded.<br />
2010 FC 495 (CanLII)<br />
[1081] The Plaintiffs are not asserting that there was a contract with the Defendant that a THA<br />
would be granted. They advance a cause of action that is available to them on the basis of the<br />
known facts and the evidence submitted in the trial of this matter.<br />
[1082] The Plaintiffs, beginning with LPL in 1996, approached the agents and employees of the<br />
Defendant with inquiries about getting access to wood to supply a mill to be built in Watson Lake.<br />
The initial overtures in 1996 led to the introduction of Mr. Brian Kerr to members of the B.I.D.<br />
Group who are based in Vanderhoof, British Columbia. That introduction occurred in late 1996 to<br />
early 1997. In July 1997, Mr. Spencer and Mr. Fehr of the B.I.D. Group travelled to Whitehorse for<br />
a meeting with representatives of DIAND. Mr. Alan Kerr and Mr. Brian Kerr attended that meeting<br />
as well, on behalf of LPL.<br />
[1083] Mr. Spencer and Mr. Fehr testified that as a result of that meeting, they were satisfied that<br />
the Defendant had committed to provide an adequate supply of timber if the mill were built.