Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...

Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ... Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...

22.01.2015 Views

Page: 256 A. Yeah, I would because the context of that statement, anywhere its read, is – again, I was in Watson Lake before this project came into existence, and what the poor performance of the past negated the government from giving that type of upfront commitment. It was always basically a, you show us and we’ll do it type of scenario. That’s not a guarantee. That is not a guarantee. We have to perform and we understood that, and that is the context of those statements, in every document that you see it, is that their actions, the government actions, it was always based upon our corporation’s performance and in doing what we said we would do. 2010 FC 495 (CanLII) [977] I find that this statement is consistent with Mr. Kerr’s testimony about the July 15, 1997 meeting. I am satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that the representation was made on July 15, 1997. [978] My finding as to this representation is also supported by events which occurred at the October 1, 1999, meeting between representatives of the forest industry and Minister Nault in Whitehorse. Ms. Clark attended on behalf of the mill. Mr. Nault, Mr. Sewell and Ms. Guscott represented DIAND. At this meeting, June Clark reiterated that SYFC needs certainty of wood supply and needs a volume of 200,000 m 3 for a viable mill. A summary of this meeting is found in Exhibit D-81, Tab 257. [979] In her presentation, a copy of which was entered at Exhibit D-11, Tab 203, Ms. Clark asserted that the Department had given “clear direction to the company over 2 years ago that there would be no commitment to a THA in the Yukon until we first built a facility. We built the facility and are operating it in Watson Lake”. She further asserted that the mill had met or over-delivered on

Page: 257 all of its commitments. There is no indication that the Minister disputed either assertion. The documents in Exhibit D-11 were entered for the truth and accuracy of their contents. [980] I am satisfied, on a balance of probabilities and having regard to the evidence before me, that in the meeting of November 14, 2001, with representatives of the forest industry in Whitehorse, Minister Nault admitted that a promise had been made to supply wood if a mill was built. I find that 2010 FC 495 (CanLII) Minister Nault admitted that a promise had been made. The transcript, entered as Exhibit P-79, Tab 357, shows the following exchange between Minister Nault and Mr. Peterson, the owner of another Watson Lake sawmill: Peterson: We didn’t roll into town and fall off a turnip truck, thinking that we were going to get tenure just because we built a saw mill. We were told we would get tenure if we had a saw mill there. Nault: I know you were. [981] In a later exchange at that meeting and recorded in the same transcript, Minister Nault says: Nault: But I can’t live with the argument that we’re putting the squeeze on the industry so bad that there is no industry; because if we’d have done that, we should have done that five years ago. We should have just said, “Forget it, guys. Don’t come around here and spend all this money, because we’re not have an industry.” But is seems to me so far we’re almost suggesting there’s not going to be an industry but not really telling you straight up. [982] I have two observations about the remarks of Mr. Nault, as recorded at the meeting held on November 14, 2001.

Page: 257<br />

all of its commitments. There is no indication that the Minister disputed either assertion. The<br />

documents in Exhibit D-11 were entered for the truth and accuracy of their contents.<br />

[980] I am satisfied, on a balance of probabilities and having regard to the evidence before me,<br />

that in the meeting of November 14, 2001, with representatives of the forest industry in Whitehorse,<br />

Minister Nault admitted that a promise had been made to supply wood if a mill was built. I find that<br />

2010 FC 495 (CanLII)<br />

Minister Nault admitted that a promise had been made. The transcript, entered as Exhibit P-79, Tab<br />

357, shows the following exchange between Minister Nault and Mr. Peterson, the owner of another<br />

Watson Lake sawmill:<br />

Peterson: We didn’t roll into town and fall off a turnip truck, thinking<br />

that we were going to get tenure just because we built a saw mill. We<br />

were told we would get tenure if we had a saw mill there.<br />

Nault: I know you were.<br />

[981] In a later exchange at that meeting and recorded in the same transcript, Minister Nault says:<br />

Nault: But I can’t live with the argument that we’re putting the<br />

squeeze on the industry so bad that there is no industry; because if<br />

we’d have done that, we should have done that five years ago. We<br />

should have just said, “Forget it, guys. Don’t come around here and<br />

spend all this money, because we’re not have an industry.” But is<br />

seems to me so far we’re almost suggesting there’s not going to be an<br />

industry but not really telling you straight up.<br />

[982] I have two observations about the remarks of Mr. Nault, as recorded at the meeting held on<br />

November 14, 2001.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!