Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...

Page: 181
[711] I also note that there is documentary evidence that shows that SYFC was given “special
access” to information relative to the wood supply and that DIAND was modifying its procedures to
keep the wood supply moving to the Plaintiffs’ mill.
[712] See for example Exhibit P-79, Tab 181. This is a DIAND internal email sent on June 2 nd by
Ms. Guscott to Ms. Snider and Mr. Casey, in Ottawa. Ms. Guscott says in her email:
2010 FC 495 (CanLII)
The call went far better than expected and really June, myself and
company reps had discussed the issues in our weekly conference call
and summer wood supply is on track. June was the SYFC rep on the
call Monday (maybe a good sign – everyone was busy doing work
work)
…
7. The company were advised that we were holding a mill reserve of
30,000 cm that could be accessed to meet any shortfall, but ask them
not to broadcast
8. The company we told straight out until we have a THA in place
purchase locally is the only real option, and surprise they did not go
off the deep end yet But most of there kind of shareholders have
winter and summer wood supply. We have also agreed to streamline
our processes when ever possible to keep supply going, but the
company must work with permit holders to obtain necessary volume.
9. If we can keep up the pace we finally have June on the ropes and it
is my intention to keep up the pace and keep her on the ropes. I do
not anticipate any letters or heat seeking missels incoming.
10. We have started to establish trust with the company now the
company has to deliver.
(Emphasis added)
[713] Significantly, this email also notes that the Regional Office was having a “weekly
conference call” with SYFC about wood supply.