Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...
Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ... Federal Court - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure Developments ...
Page: 140 [557] Mr. MacDonell was in the process of completing a new TSA which would consider the criteria proposed by industry, trappers, environmentalists and other forest users. His concern related to ensuring that the Minister received a balanced picture, and not just the industry preference. Mr. MacDonell also noted that he was six weeks away from completing the TSA report. 2010 FC 495 (CanLII) [558] Notwithstanding the claim that the report was almost ready, this report was not issued until January 2003 when the DIAND/YTG Technical Timber Supply Committee issued the MacDonell Report. [559] This report concluded that Y02 and Y03 contain approximately 5.1 million hectares of land. The maximum biological potential, that is the scientifically sustainable harvest, before sociological and environmental net downs, was 1.6 million m 3 of timber per year. All stakeholders who were consulted, except the Trappers Association, believed that the TSA of 128,000 m 3 was too low. It also noted that even-flow harvest policies were only used in two jurisdictions in Canada. VI. DISCUSSION A. Introduction [560] At the beginning of my discussion, I have a preliminary comment. [561] The trial judge in Carrier Lumber Ltd. v. British Columbia (1999), 30 C.E.L.R. (N.S.) 219 (B.C.S.C.) said:
Page: 141 479 In some respects counsel on both sides of this action have, in my respectful view, fallen into the trap lawyers, particularly lawyers involved with issues of contract, often fall into. The focus of much of their efforts in argument has been on a series of highly refined and narrowly focused issues in which their attention has been engaged with issues which the general public might well view as the splitting of hairs. 480 In these comments I do not wish to be taken as being critical of counsel or their efforts, indeed this is a case in which the gratitude of the court should be extended to the counsel who appeared at this trial. In attempting to carry out their task, counsel is required to refine and articulate their respective clients' positions in seeking to advance them. It is a process which is by design and necessity, a partisan one in which, in theory, the truth emerges from the adversarial process. 2010 FC 495 (CanLII) 481 The nature of the discipline of law and the techniques of legal analysis tend towards a type of focused and narrow analysis which isolates attention on narrow issues. 482 The task of the trial judge must be to bring to the process a detached examination of the case as a whole before turning to any microscopic examination of any individual issue. … 484 These characterizations move the conflict from the personal to the theoretical, they engage amorphous and broad issues of public policy and focus attention on technical matters. 485 With respect, that is not, in reality, what this action is about. This case is about a much more profound and yet simple question. Can the defendant induce a private citizen, in this case a corporation, to enter into a contract which offers to the plaintiff payment in very specific terms by delivery of 5,000,000 cubic metres of wood, and then through use of its power and legislative capacity fundamentally change the bargain, years later [562] While there are factual differences between Carrier Lumber Ltd. and the present case, there are some similarities, including the “series of highly refined and narrowly focused issues…which the general public might well view as the splitting of hairs” that were argued by the Defendant. As
- Page 89 and 90: Page: 89 [349] Mr. Henry explained,
- Page 91 and 92: Page: 91 It seems the goal of havin
- Page 93 and 94: Page: 93 [365] The Plaintiffs were
- Page 95 and 96: Page: 95 remained on the site for s
- Page 97 and 98: Page: 97 evidence, which is consist
- Page 99 and 100: Page: 99 [389] A meeting was held o
- Page 101 and 102: Page: 101 [396] These documents wer
- Page 103 and 104: Page: 103 location under a future C
- Page 105 and 106: Page: 105 [414] A briefing note, da
- Page 107 and 108: Page: 107 to shut down operations i
- Page 109 and 110: Page: 109 continuing delays by DIAN
- Page 111 and 112: Page: 111 [439] On October 1, 1999,
- Page 113 and 114: Page: 113 [447] In October 1999, DI
- Page 115 and 116: Page: 115 regulations would impleme
- Page 117 and 118: Page: 117 [464] There was another m
- Page 119 and 120: Page: 119 [472] Mr. Ballantyne, the
- Page 121 and 122: Page: 121 [482] However, there is a
- Page 123 and 124: Page: 123 [488] I note that on the
- Page 125 and 126: Page: 125 [498] Mr. Ballantyne said
- Page 127 and 128: Page: 127 [508] SYFC had announced
- Page 129 and 130: Page: 129 [516] The closure of the
- Page 131 and 132: Page: 131 [523] The Hyland-Coal THA
- Page 133 and 134: Page: 133 [531] As mentioned earlie
- Page 135 and 136: Page: 135 explained to YCS that the
- Page 137 and 138: Page: 137 [543] At this time the jo
- Page 139: Page: 139 without the promised timb
- Page 143 and 144: Page: 143 B. Preliminary Issues [56
- Page 145 and 146: Page: 145 of action arising in that
- Page 147 and 148: Page: 147 [577] In responding to th
- Page 149 and 150: Page: 149 The plaintiff shall serve
- Page 151 and 152: Page: 151 20 For the reasons expres
- Page 153 and 154: Page: 153 [598] Both the Plaintiffs
- Page 155 and 156: Page: 155 … Liability for acts of
- Page 157 and 158: Page: 157 from the evidence, and if
- Page 159 and 160: Page: 159 [616] Mr. Gurney is an un
- Page 161 and 162: Page: 161 Q. Did you understand the
- Page 163 and 164: Page: 163 [633] Mr. Madill was anot
- Page 165 and 166: Page: 165 [643] Having regard to th
- Page 167 and 168: Page: 167 [653] In Design Services
- Page 169 and 170: Page: 169 [660] In Childs v. Desorm
- Page 171 and 172: Page: 171 [668] This reliance by th
- Page 173 and 174: Page: 173 [674] Similarly, the Defe
- Page 175 and 176: Page: 175 we would be interested in
- Page 177 and 178: Page: 177 happy with this decision)
- Page 179 and 180: Page: 179 [703] This high unemploym
- Page 181 and 182: Page: 181 [711] I also note that th
- Page 183 and 184: Page: 183 [718] This is not the cas
- Page 185 and 186: Page: 185 [726] In my opinion, the
- Page 187 and 188: Page: 187 [732] Similarly, Mr. Loek
- Page 189 and 190: Page: 189 [741] There is no doubt t
Page: 140<br />
[557] Mr. MacDonell was in the process of completing a new TSA which would consider the<br />
criteria proposed by industry, trappers, environmentalists and other forest users. His concern related<br />
to ensuring that the Minister received a balanced picture, and not just the industry preference. Mr.<br />
MacDonell also noted that he was six weeks away from completing the TSA report.<br />
2010 FC 495 (CanLII)<br />
[558] Notwithstanding the claim that the report was almost ready, this report was not issued until<br />
January 2003 when the DIAND/YTG Technical Timber Supply Committee issued the MacDonell<br />
Report.<br />
[559] This report concluded that Y02 and Y03 contain approximately 5.1 million hectares of land.<br />
The maximum biological potential, that is the scientifically sustainable harvest, before sociological<br />
and environmental net downs, was 1.6 million m 3 of timber per year. All stakeholders who were<br />
consulted, except the Trappers Association, believed that the TSA of 128,000 m 3 was too low. It<br />
also noted that even-flow harvest policies were only used in two jurisdictions in Canada.<br />
VI. DISCUSSION<br />
A. Introduction<br />
[560] At the beginning of my discussion, I have a preliminary comment.<br />
[561] The trial judge in Carrier Lumber Ltd. v. British Columbia (1999), 30 C.E.L.R. (N.S.) 219<br />
(B.C.S.C.) said: