Asphalt Review - Volume 30 Number 2 - Australian Asphalt ...
Asphalt Review - Volume 30 Number 2 - Australian Asphalt ...
Asphalt Review - Volume 30 Number 2 - Australian Asphalt ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Asphalt</strong><strong>Review</strong><br />
<strong>Volume</strong> <strong>30</strong> <strong>Number</strong> 1 June/July 2011<br />
From the AAPA Chairman 22<br />
From the AAPA CEO 24<br />
Queensland road network – improving<br />
resilience to natural disasters 27<br />
Sustainability as a factor in future<br />
road pavement tenders <strong>30</strong><br />
Long term full depth asphalt pavement performance<br />
in Australia – Part 2 32<br />
AAPA establishes carbon price working group 37<br />
Have your skills formally recognised 40<br />
AAPA releases a new Bitumen Burns Card 41
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
Chairman’s Report<br />
Sergio Cinerari,<br />
Chairman, AAPA<br />
The middle of the financial year is always<br />
a busy time, with some contract work<br />
needed to be completed and planning for<br />
the next year. This year there is also a need<br />
to plan to meet the demands from the<br />
Queensland floods. But we should do more<br />
than just plan for one or two years; instead<br />
we should be planning for the long term of<br />
our industry.<br />
Roads are the backbones of our<br />
communities. They link production and<br />
supply of goods, agriculture and markets,<br />
mines and ports. Over Australia’s history,<br />
roads have been the most important<br />
infrastructure that has enabled Australia to<br />
grow and they will continue to be needed<br />
to maintain our economy and wellbeing.<br />
Our responsibility as an industry<br />
is therefore to maintain high quality<br />
and affordable roads, and to do that,<br />
we must also ensure that our industry<br />
remains sustainable.<br />
When planning for the future we must<br />
look to the long term. With this in mind,<br />
AAPA encourages governments to provide<br />
details of long term roads infrastructure<br />
programs. With a four or five year plan,<br />
industry can better manage its resources<br />
to meet the ongoing requirements in<br />
materials, equipment and importantly,<br />
trained workers.<br />
As we look to the future we must also<br />
ensure our industry operates effectively<br />
and in the most environmentally<br />
sustainable way. Some governments<br />
already include non-price attributes in<br />
contracts and with initiatives such as<br />
the VicRoads’ INVEST 5 star project<br />
rating scheme (described in this edition<br />
of <strong>Asphalt</strong> <strong>Review</strong>) performance and<br />
environmental outcomes are likely to<br />
become more important. This in itself<br />
is a reason to ensure that our activities<br />
are as sustainable as possible. However,<br />
as a key industry in Australia, we also<br />
have a community responsibility to apply<br />
sustainable practices.<br />
It is therefore a credit to our industry that<br />
we have embraced the warm mix asphalt<br />
technology and I congratulate the New<br />
South Wales RTA for its new specifications<br />
that allow the use of warm mix. Other<br />
governments are also supporting this<br />
technology with its many benefits, including<br />
lower greenhouse emissions.<br />
Our industry is also strongly embracing<br />
the use of recycled asphalt pavements<br />
(RAP). Bitumen, sprayed seals and asphalt<br />
are already very low sources of greenhouse<br />
gas emissions. However, these materials<br />
are also fully recyclable and this reduces<br />
the overall greenhouse emissions even<br />
further. It also reduces the demand on new<br />
raw material such as aggregates. A sealed<br />
road is therefore a long linear quarry able<br />
to provide materials for current and<br />
future generations.<br />
The current AAPA project investigating<br />
perpetual pavements is another example<br />
of the industry working to identify even<br />
more sustainable pavements. These will<br />
last indefinitely with just the top wearing<br />
course being replaced every 15 to 20 years<br />
and that removed material being reused in<br />
another pavement.<br />
Despite the obvious sustainable nature<br />
of bituminous pavements, we must ensure<br />
that decision makers in government and<br />
the community at large are aware of the<br />
low impacts. For example; even though<br />
bitumen is a hydrocarbon, it is not<br />
combusted and the government’s proposed<br />
carbon price does not inadvertently apply<br />
to bitumen.<br />
So as we plan for the next year and<br />
beyond, we should all remember that our<br />
industry should be planning not just for<br />
one or two years, but instead, should be<br />
looking to the long term of our<br />
key industry.<br />
Before finishing my note I must inform<br />
AAPA members of two changes to the<br />
AAPA Board. Firstly Mark Barraclough<br />
has resigned from Fulton Hogan and from<br />
the Board. Mark was only on the Board<br />
for a short period but I and other Board<br />
members valued his contribution. On<br />
behalf of all Board members and AAPA<br />
I wish him well in whatever career he<br />
decides to pursue in future. Mark is to be<br />
replaced by Duncan Fraser on the Board<br />
and I look forward to working with him.<br />
Kevin McCullough has resigned<br />
from Boral <strong>Asphalt</strong> to work for another<br />
Queensland-based pavement company.<br />
Kevin was Vice-Chairman and also only<br />
served on the Board for a few meetings.<br />
However, like Mark, his contribution was<br />
greatly valued. A replacement for Kevin has<br />
not yet been made.<br />
Whilst talking about people, I<br />
should welcome two new key staff<br />
members to AAPA. They are Jim Beesley<br />
and Rick Hattam. Jim has commenced<br />
as the first AAPA Regional Executive<br />
in Western Australia and Rick as the<br />
Regional Executive in Victoria. Both men<br />
have many years of experience in our<br />
industry and will help us to plan for and<br />
achieve a long lasting and sustainable<br />
pavement industry.<br />
22 ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011
Avoiding<br />
is easy with
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
CEO’S REPORT<br />
John Lambert,<br />
CEO, AAPA<br />
A few weeks ago, I was discussing the<br />
impacts of the high rainfall in areas such<br />
as Victoria. We all recognise the massive<br />
damage due to the Queensland floods,<br />
but in many other parts of eastern<br />
Australia, there has also been rainfall<br />
significantly above the last decade’s<br />
average. Those of us who have worked in<br />
our industry for many years can remember<br />
times of high rainfall, but for those who<br />
have only worked for a decade or less,<br />
there are many new challenges to address.<br />
With a focus on meeting contract<br />
deadlines or completing work earlier to<br />
achieve a bonus combined with unusually<br />
wet conditions, there is a potential risk to<br />
pavement life. It is therefore important<br />
that the skills and experience held by many<br />
in our industry are passed on to those with<br />
less experience.<br />
AAPA has provided practical training<br />
courses for many years using experienced<br />
trainers such as Walter Holtrop. One of<br />
AAPA’s key functions over the next year<br />
will be to continue developing our existing<br />
training courses and, where appropriate,<br />
develop new courses. These will ensure the<br />
training reflects the needs of our industry.<br />
One such course being developed will<br />
provide better knowledge of unbound<br />
granular pavements. Our major flexible<br />
pavements conference in September<br />
and regular breakfast meetings also<br />
provide valuable information on a wide<br />
range of current and emerging issues<br />
and technologies.<br />
However, a key to AAPA’s contribution<br />
to our industry has been through its State<br />
Branches and its Regional Executives.<br />
Each jurisdiction, other than the Northern<br />
Territory and the ACT, has a Branch<br />
chaired by one of its major producer<br />
members. And in the Northern Territory,<br />
a joint industry/government working group<br />
has been established. Also, three States –<br />
Qld, NSW and Victoria – have a full-time<br />
AAPA Regional Executive.<br />
Regional Executives support the<br />
activities of each Branch as well as<br />
helping to identify and lead key projects.<br />
Importantly, they provide the links between<br />
industry and government members,<br />
particularly in technical areas, but also in<br />
areas such as health and safety. Together,<br />
the Regional Executives also provide a<br />
national resource to support our industry.<br />
Regional Executives comprise people<br />
with many years of direct and relevant<br />
experience. In Queensland and NSW,<br />
the Regional Executives are Rob Vos and<br />
Dougall Broadfoot respectively and I am<br />
pleased to announce that Rick Hattam<br />
has been appointed as the new Regional<br />
Executive for Victoria.<br />
Rick has taken the position left by<br />
Cassandra Simpson who had the position<br />
on a 12 month secondment from VicRoads.<br />
Cassandra has returned to VicRoads and<br />
I express my great thanks to Cassandra and<br />
VicRoads for a fantastic 12 month period.<br />
Rick, like Cassandra, has had many years<br />
in our industry having previously worked<br />
for VicRoads and its predecessor,<br />
the Country Roads Board (CRB). He has<br />
also worked on pavements in Scotland<br />
and Fiji. Prior to joining AAPA, Rick<br />
was the Works Manager in the Golden<br />
Plains Council and brings not only state<br />
road authority experience, but also local<br />
government experience. On behalf of all<br />
of AAPA I welcome Rick.<br />
Recognising the important role that the<br />
Regional Executive plays in our industry,<br />
and recognising the emerging challenges<br />
and opportunities in Western Australia,<br />
the Board determined to appoint an<br />
executive for that State.<br />
As a result, Jim Beesley has been<br />
appointed as the first AAPA Regional<br />
Executive in WA. Like Rick, Jim has many<br />
years working in our industry, but in Jim’s<br />
case, he has worked for several of the key<br />
producers in Western Australia,<br />
most recently with Downer EDI Works.<br />
He brings not only a detailed knowledge<br />
of the industry, but also knows most of<br />
the key players in the WA sector.<br />
One of the reasons for appointing an<br />
Executive in WA was the recognition<br />
that there are some differences between<br />
pavements in Western Australia and those<br />
in the eastern states. On a recent tour of<br />
some road projects it was clear that the<br />
predominant sub-base is sand, a different<br />
sub-base to most pavements in the eastern<br />
states. Western Australia also has huge<br />
distances to travel and massive mining<br />
infrastructure. Jim will help to address<br />
these differences but also, through links<br />
with the other Regional Executives, be able<br />
to share information nationally.<br />
For example: experience in outback<br />
Queensland will be able to be more<br />
effectively shared with Western Australia<br />
and vica-versa. On behalf of all of AAPA I<br />
welcome Jim.<br />
With a full complement of staff AAPA is<br />
able to provide maximum support for our<br />
industry. This includes working with the<br />
Federal Government to ensure that future<br />
carbon pricing does not unfairly impact<br />
on our industry. We are also continuing<br />
to promote sustainable practices such as<br />
warm mix asphalt and increased use of<br />
recycled asphalt.<br />
An example of the work of the Regional<br />
Executives is that at a recent AAPA<br />
Vicroads/industry meeting it was agreed<br />
to work together to prepare new draft<br />
specification to allow warm mix.<br />
This is to be done so it is ready to be<br />
adopted, provided the assumed positive<br />
outcomes from the AAPA/Austroads Warm<br />
Mix Validation Project are achieved.<br />
In Queensland, Rob Vos has supported<br />
industry and government colleagues in that<br />
state to respond effectively to the floods<br />
(refer to the article on the Queensland<br />
Floods in this edition of <strong>Asphalt</strong> <strong>Review</strong>).<br />
The AAPA National Technology<br />
Committee, supported by the Regional<br />
Executives, is also working with members<br />
and the governments of Australia through<br />
Austroads to ensure that technical<br />
standards are appropriate and are<br />
applied equitably.<br />
With four Regional Executives AAPA<br />
promises to deliver an invaluable service to<br />
its members next year and beyond, and I<br />
look forward to working with them for the<br />
betterment of our industry.<br />
One of the activities of AAPA is to<br />
provide current and accurate technical<br />
24 ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
OLEXOBIT ® MAX is a polymer modified binder for sprayed sealing applications that provides<br />
protection against cracking in strain alleviating membranes.<br />
Thanks to the unique OLEXOBIT ® polymer technology pioneered by BP Bitumen, OLEXOBIT ® MAX<br />
delivers valuable performance benefits:<br />
• Excellent resistance to crack reflection in strain alleviating membranes.<br />
• Minimised risk of reflection cracking on existing cracked surfaces where the cracks are<br />
active, or where the potential for cracking exists. It is also suitable for use in severe high<br />
stress seal applications.<br />
• Superior early life adhesion and excellent long-term aggregate retention.<br />
For more information about OLEXOBIT ® MAX,<br />
visit our website: www.bpbitumen.com.au<br />
e-mail: bpbitumenaustralia@bp.com<br />
Technical Helpline: 1800 24 88 66 (FREECALL)<br />
ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011 25
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
CEO’s Report continued...<br />
information. As a result, AAPA has recently<br />
released a guide to the safe handling of<br />
bitumen hoses.<br />
Bitumen at elevated temperatures can<br />
cause major burns if not handled correctly<br />
and in this edition of <strong>Asphalt</strong> <strong>Review</strong> there<br />
is information on the appropriate response<br />
to a burn. However, the aim of our industry<br />
is that there are never any bitumen burns.<br />
Recognising that new bitumen hoses and<br />
couplings are now available, AAPA has<br />
reviewed and updated its Guide 7,<br />
Safe Use of Bitumen Transfer Hoses.<br />
The new guide was prepared with the<br />
assistance of bitumen hose manufacturers<br />
and representatives of major AAPA<br />
members through the Bituminous<br />
Surfacing Research Reference Group<br />
(BSRRG) and the AAPA National<br />
Technology Committee. The new guide<br />
provides recommendations for the<br />
information of all employees, supervisors<br />
and managers who are involved in bitumen<br />
transfers. The guide is available for free<br />
download from the AAPA website.<br />
Safety is always of paramount<br />
importance to everyone in our industry. It<br />
is also important that the general public<br />
is aware of the need to ensure safety,<br />
particularly around roadside worksites.<br />
In Australia we thankfully have few<br />
incidents, and even fewer deaths, but<br />
any incident and certainly deaths, are<br />
unacceptable. Did you know that in 2009,<br />
667 US workers and motorists were killed<br />
in highway work zones and more than<br />
40,000 were injured<br />
To help reduce the number of injuries<br />
and deaths, the US commenced a<br />
National Work Zone Awareness Week<br />
in 1999. This program is part of the US<br />
Department of Transport, Federal Highway<br />
Administration Work Zone Mobility and<br />
Safety Program and to remind drivers how<br />
important it is to keep highway workers,<br />
themselves and passengers safe.<br />
The program has significantly helped<br />
to reduce the number of deaths and serious<br />
injuries in the US, but from the figures<br />
above, there is still a long way to go.<br />
With our significantly smaller population<br />
and strong focus on safety around<br />
worksites, the number of deaths and<br />
injuries is tiny in comparison.<br />
However, even one death is one too<br />
many and AAPA’s industry and state road<br />
authority members constantly focus<br />
on making work zones even safer; for<br />
example, by always considering better<br />
ways to separate traffic from workers,<br />
such as through road closures.<br />
For information about the US<br />
Department of Transport Work Zone<br />
Mobility and Safety Program and the 2011<br />
Work Zone Awareness Week refer to<br />
www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/wz<br />
7949278AA<br />
26 ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
Queensland road network<br />
– improving resilience to<br />
natural disasters<br />
The cyclones and floods in Queensland,<br />
shocking as they were, have provided<br />
the roads industry with unprecedented<br />
challenges and opportunities.<br />
Damage has occurred across the whole<br />
state and, for the roads, 85% has been in<br />
pavement damage. Fast flowing waters<br />
have washed away granular material<br />
and thin road surfaces while the flooded<br />
pavements have weakened and deformed.<br />
Road users quickly became aware of<br />
the inconveniences of limited or no<br />
access but the economic consequences of<br />
damaged and impassable roads has the<br />
long term impact.<br />
At the AAPA Queensland Branch<br />
communications forum in April 2011<br />
Shane Doran (1) of Queensland Transport<br />
and Main Roads Department detailed<br />
how the reconstruction would take place<br />
and the department would mobilise<br />
the resources.<br />
Extent of damage<br />
By Robert Vos<br />
AAPA Queensland Executive<br />
Queensland Transport Network reconstruction damage by region<br />
during natural disasters in 2010 and 2011 (1)<br />
Cecil Plains East showing example of pavement<br />
damage (1) (photo courtesy of Queensland Transport<br />
and Main Road)<br />
News reports have clearly presented the<br />
extent and magnitude of the natural<br />
disasters that have hit Queensland in 2010<br />
and 2011. Cyclones Olga, Neville, Ului<br />
and Paul in the first quarter of 2010 were<br />
followed by flooding in South West and<br />
South East Queensland in the 3rd quarter.<br />
From January to March 2011 tropical<br />
cyclones Tasha, Anthony and Yasi added<br />
to the monsoonal flooding which impacted<br />
most of the state.<br />
Over 9,000km of the Queensland road<br />
network was damaged by the weather<br />
events, 29 % of the state’s rail network was<br />
impacted and 89 bridges and culverts were<br />
damaged. Significant pavement damage<br />
has occurred, in addition to landslips on<br />
slopes and damage to culverts and bridges.<br />
Of the transport network, Queensland’s<br />
road infrastructure bore a major portion<br />
of the damage from these natural events<br />
leaving the state little choice but to look<br />
to the National Disaster Relief & Recovery<br />
Arrangements for assistance. This<br />
assistance provides a 75% contribution<br />
from the Commonwealth Government for<br />
reconstruction of damaged infrastructure<br />
within 24 months.<br />
By mid May 2011 the estimate of the<br />
repair bill for the Queensland Transport<br />
Network was $4.36 billion. With the<br />
short time frame to undertake the<br />
reconstruction, this will put pressure on<br />
all parts on the road construction and<br />
maintenance industry to deliver. The<br />
disruption of the broad road and rail<br />
network was a reminder to all of the<br />
important part the transport network<br />
plays in providing the necessities of life;<br />
food and medical care, but importantly<br />
too in this resource rich state, the need<br />
to maintain a constant stream of exports<br />
which underpin the Queensland GDP.<br />
Delivering the program<br />
Under the title “Transport Network<br />
Reconstruction Program (TNRP)” (1) ,<br />
the Department of Transport and Main<br />
Roads has embarked on a well structured<br />
ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011 27
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
Governance and delivery hierarchy (1)<br />
delivery framework where the overall<br />
coordination and funding is through a<br />
Statewide Program Office with 12 Regional<br />
Program Offices established to design,<br />
specify, clear approval, tender and deliver<br />
the program. At state and regional level,<br />
use is being made of departmental and<br />
professional consulting staff to facilitate<br />
and speedup the delivery. Governance,<br />
accountability and transparency are being<br />
maintained in the process, which includes<br />
the Federal Inspectorate to oversee the<br />
interests of the federal funders.<br />
The magnitude of the required repairs<br />
can be difficult to grasp, historical funding<br />
for road repairs has been in the order<br />
of $20 million to $50 billion. Unless an<br />
extended reconstruction timeframe is<br />
approved, the peak annual expenditure<br />
could be as much as 100 times more.<br />
The overarching delivery philosophies<br />
include reconstruction delivery by the<br />
regions supported by local prequalified<br />
contracting capability and use of major<br />
contractors to supplement local industry.<br />
It was anticipated that 65% of the works<br />
would be handled by private contractors<br />
and 35% by local government and RoadTek<br />
– the construction arm of the Department.<br />
By the end of May 2011 the first tranche of<br />
projects were underway.<br />
Program objectives<br />
and risks<br />
The stated objectives and strategic risks<br />
of the Queensland Transport Network<br />
Reconstruction Program are included<br />
in the table reflecting the importance of<br />
resilience, value for money and the risks<br />
pertinent to a significant growth<br />
in demand.<br />
Objectives<br />
• Coordination across lines of<br />
reconstruction<br />
• Resilience of network<br />
• Immunity enhancement opportunities<br />
• Value for money<br />
• Timely completion<br />
• Communication and engagement<br />
• Transition back to normal business<br />
Strategic risks<br />
• Cost escalation - materials and labour<br />
• Decreased availability – plant and<br />
material<br />
• Market unable to meet demand<br />
• Attracting and retaining contractor<br />
involvement<br />
• Market overheating<br />
• Competing demand for resources<br />
(mining)<br />
• Lack of coordination in delivery<br />
• Continued wet weather<br />
The expected increases in demand over<br />
the three years for products affecting<br />
AAPA members include bitumen +200<br />
000 tonnes, granular +10 500 000 tonnes,<br />
asphalt 500 000 tonnes and more than<br />
70 stabilisers for foam and cement<br />
improvement of damaged granular bases.<br />
From a materials view point, current<br />
supply capacity was considered adequate<br />
or flexible enough to meet those demands<br />
but some forward purchases of granular<br />
material and advanced four month<br />
warning for binder supply would be<br />
beneficial. Smoothing of the demand and<br />
a proper pipeline of all the infrastructure<br />
projects was considered to be essential.<br />
The most likely bottleneck would be in<br />
general haulage of all materials to remote<br />
and dispersed sites and the demand for<br />
skills arising from the program and the<br />
mining developments.<br />
The Queensland surfacing industry<br />
reviewed its capabilities, and when<br />
considering the significant expansion in<br />
the demand for stabilised bases and spare<br />
capacity in the hot-mix manufacturing and<br />
paving sector, suggested the use of bitumen<br />
treated bases should be included in the<br />
reconstruction program. By including<br />
the spare resources in the hotmix sector<br />
the strategic risks would be reduced and<br />
expand the options for delivery.<br />
Bitumen treated bases (BTB)<br />
When considering the objectives of<br />
network resilience, immunity enhancement<br />
and timely completion bitumen treated<br />
bases (BTB) well and truly ticked the<br />
boxes. BTB is well suited to remote and<br />
rural works as it is based on available<br />
granular “run-of-crusher” material, using<br />
large aggregate basecourse quality material<br />
and relatively low bitumen contents.<br />
Bitumen treated base concepts are not<br />
new and were the basis of many thick<br />
pavements in the past. Run of crusher<br />
material as opposed to the separation of<br />
discrete fractions of aggregates for later<br />
recombination into hotmix asphalt is a<br />
common way of making asphalt in the<br />
USA and is a standard product in many<br />
other countries.<br />
Queensland Main Roads<br />
Ten years ago, BTB was used by Boral<br />
asphalt in the Enhanced Road Condition<br />
Project (ERCP) project at Nanango in<br />
Queensland where it was described as<br />
an economical, relatively dense graded<br />
asphalt mix which: (2)<br />
• Uses an economical quarry run material<br />
or available quarry fractions;<br />
• Uses crushed aggregate with good shape<br />
and a large maximum size;<br />
• Avoids the use of rounded sands –<br />
crushed fines are preferred, although the<br />
use of a small percentage of natural sand<br />
has been found to improve workability.<br />
• Has an aggregate grading with a smooth<br />
curve to ensure mechanical interlock;<br />
• Has a relatively low binder content –<br />
28 ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
after considering fatigue life;<br />
• Uses production and laying procedures<br />
which limit segregation;<br />
• Recognises the importance of good field<br />
compaction<br />
Queensland Mackay<br />
Regional Council<br />
Other members of AAPA in Queensland<br />
have used BTB’s on projects mostly in<br />
municipal areas. A recent example of<br />
this was reported (3) by Mackay Regional<br />
Council on numerous BTB projects<br />
subjected to heavy vehicle loading<br />
and based on Queensland Main Roads<br />
Specifications MRS11.05 unbound type 2<br />
base material with C320 bitumen contents<br />
of 3.5 to 4.0%.<br />
Details of six projects undertaken by<br />
Fulton Hogan ranging from 150 to 350mm<br />
thickness of BTB and 50mm asphalt<br />
wearing course were evaluated and results<br />
presented.<br />
Benefits listed included immediate<br />
opening to traffic, which has very high<br />
value in a municipal environment, cost<br />
effective against traditional pavements<br />
with reduced maintenance costs.<br />
Future considerations included<br />
increased use of RAP and possibility of<br />
Warm Mix technologies.<br />
Prospect Highway full depth asphalt – rapid full<br />
depth construction on weak subgrade (4)<br />
New South Wales<br />
Blacktown<br />
Reporting on full depth asphalt<br />
pavements (4) that have performed like<br />
“perpetual pavements” over the last 25<br />
to <strong>30</strong> years, some of bases laid in the<br />
early 1970s were 40mm sized run-ofcrusher<br />
material. Where sub-grades were<br />
weak, the asphalt was grader spread and<br />
compacted to provide a strong platform<br />
for subsequent layers. The resilience<br />
and durability of this thick asphalt<br />
was assessed against traffic loading,<br />
maintenance costs and traffic loading<br />
and these heavy duty pavements. Their<br />
whole-of-life cost comparison to alternate<br />
pavement types showed they were the<br />
preferred option; also they could be<br />
constructed much more rapidly and at<br />
a lower cost due to lower haulage costs<br />
and disposal costs of excavate material.<br />
AAPA technical<br />
committees take action<br />
At the March 2011 meeting of the<br />
National Technical Committee, it was<br />
agreed that the AAPA suite of guides would<br />
be updated to include recommendations<br />
on the use and specification for Bitumen<br />
Treated Bases.<br />
Acknowledging the potential in<br />
Queensland, that state’s Technical<br />
Committee was tasked to develop a<br />
project level specification to help establish<br />
or confirm the necessary performance<br />
requirements of the mix and attempt to<br />
have that trialled during the reconstruction<br />
projects in the state.<br />
A small working group representing all<br />
the asphalt producers was established with<br />
the Queensland Transport and Main Roads<br />
(TMR) specifications used as the basis for<br />
the project specification. A contract was<br />
called incorporating BTB on the Warrego<br />
Highway east of Roma which provided<br />
an opportunity to engage with TMR<br />
technical and field staff in reviewing the<br />
AAPA Queensland developed specification.<br />
A combined BTB steering committee has<br />
been established which incorporates AAPA<br />
members & TMR staff, and it continues<br />
to develop the specification with feedback<br />
obtained from the project.<br />
The Warrego Highway project envisages<br />
the use of BTB as an overlay on the<br />
existing sealed surface with shoulders<br />
widened and strengthened with BTB. An<br />
Traffic backs as flooding cuts the Warrego Highway<br />
at Gorrie Creek near Toowoomba- January 2011<br />
(Courier Mail photo by Glenn Hampson)<br />
estimated 200 000 tonnes of BTB will be<br />
used on the project.<br />
Bitumen Treated Base<br />
– improved resilience<br />
to natural disasters<br />
The Queensland floods have identified<br />
the need to maintain mobility and quickly<br />
restore damaged road pavements. With<br />
frequent flooding and long inundation,<br />
many of the thinly surfaced conventional<br />
granular pavements are easily scoured<br />
away or left in a weakened state for an<br />
extended period after the water recedes.<br />
Bound granular pavements improve on<br />
the resilience of the granular base: foam<br />
stabilised granular materials helps. But,<br />
fully bound bitumen bases, making use of<br />
regionally available granular basecourse<br />
standard crushed rock, provides<br />
significantly improved resilience to water<br />
damage and can be reopened to traffic<br />
much earlier. Importantly, with the rush to<br />
complete the reconstruction, BTB can be<br />
built extremely quickly with much reduced<br />
traffic accommodation and provide an<br />
easier construction program.<br />
With care in the handling of the raw<br />
materials, BTB can be a high volume<br />
product for use in areas that have<br />
traditionally not had access to fully<br />
bitumen bound bases due to limitations in<br />
crushing capabilities.<br />
References<br />
1. Presentation to the April 2011 AAPA<br />
Queensland Communications Forum, “The<br />
Challenges of Reconstructing Queensland’s<br />
Transport Network” by Shane Doran,<br />
Queensland Transport & Main Roads<br />
Department.<br />
2. “Bitumen Treated Base (BTB) Principles and<br />
Practices” Boral <strong>Asphalt</strong> TR15, 1999 by Ken<br />
Wonson, Boral <strong>Asphalt</strong>.<br />
3. “Is Bitumen Treated Base a viable option<br />
in pavement construction” presentation to 5th<br />
<strong>Australian</strong> Road Engineering & Maintenance<br />
Conference 2010 by Bill Moffat, Mackay<br />
Regional Council.<br />
4. “A road pavement for very rapid construction<br />
– 25 to 35 years of success”, presentation at<br />
AAPA NSW feedback to Local Government,<br />
May 2011 by Paul Ritchie, Ritchie Civil<br />
Engineering Pty Ltd.<br />
ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011 29
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
Sustainability as a<br />
factor in future road<br />
pavement tenders<br />
Sustainability is a word that has different<br />
meanings to different people. For example;<br />
to many business people sustainability<br />
means continued profitability for their<br />
company. For a marathon runner, it<br />
means being able to keep running at peak<br />
performance for the whole race. To others<br />
in our community, sustainability means<br />
environmental sustainability. That is<br />
maintaining the biodiversity of our plants<br />
and animals, the health of our waterways<br />
and air quality, and preserving resources<br />
and opportunities for future generations.<br />
In many ways these are all one and<br />
the same.We can’t sustain our businesses<br />
and opportunities for future generations<br />
without maintaining our environment.<br />
We can’t maintain our environment and<br />
health without sustainable business and<br />
our economy.<br />
As most environmental, social and<br />
sustainability aspects are not currently<br />
“priced”, many business decisions are<br />
made by principally considering only<br />
the economic cost. For example; road<br />
construction tenders are primarily based<br />
on the tender price. That is, lowest price<br />
usually wins.<br />
Issues such as past road performance<br />
and the need to have qualified operational<br />
staff are becoming more prevalent in some<br />
tenders and companies generally do take<br />
action to reduce environmental impacts<br />
as much as possible. However; there is<br />
usually no direct price benefit from taking<br />
additional steps to improve sustainability,<br />
although in some situations sustainable<br />
practices can reduce final cost. In future<br />
this may change particularly in the area<br />
of environmental sustainability, as some<br />
government agencies are considering<br />
including non-price sustainability factors<br />
in tender evaluations.<br />
One such agency is VicRoads. In its<br />
Sustainability and Climate Change<br />
Strategy 2010-2015 a key objective is to<br />
improve sustainability in road construction<br />
and maintenance. This is to be achieved<br />
by increasing the use of recycled materials<br />
and importantly by increasing the use<br />
of contract incentives to encourage<br />
project sustainability.<br />
As a step towards increasing the<br />
use of contact incentives VicRoads<br />
released INVEST (Integrated VicRoads<br />
Environmental Sustainability Tool) in May<br />
this year. This is a 5-star sustainable rating<br />
tool that will enable VicRoads to assess<br />
and compare the sustainable aspects of<br />
project design and performance.<br />
VicRoads Sustainability initiative:<br />
a star rating tool for roads<br />
At this stage, no financial value has<br />
been assigned to the rating tool, but it is<br />
possible that this could follow once the<br />
tool has been trialled. The tool, combined<br />
with the Carbon calculator currently being<br />
finalised by VicRoads, is likely to become a<br />
significant component in evaluating future<br />
tenders offered in Victoria. The following<br />
information on INVEST was provided<br />
by Dr Helen Murphy VicRoads Director<br />
Environmental Sustainability.<br />
VicRoads has recently released its sustainability<br />
rating tool for road construction projects,<br />
named INVEST (Integrated VicRoads<br />
Environmental Sustainability Tool).<br />
At the launch at Melbourne Zoo attended by<br />
over 100 contractors and consultants, Gary Liddle,<br />
Chief Executive of VicRoads, noted that INVEST<br />
demonstrated the organisation’s commitment to<br />
sustainability and supported the key directions of<br />
the Sustainability and Climate Change Strategy.<br />
The aims of INVEST are to:<br />
• encourage the investigation and<br />
implementation of innovative ideas<br />
which will contribute to improving<br />
sustainability in road projects;<br />
• recognise outstanding sustainability practices;<br />
• increase awareness of sustainable practices in road projects;<br />
• establish benchmarks for sustainability and encourage continual improvement.<br />
Similar to other rating tools, INVEST is a certification program that<br />
distinguishes road construction projects based on the extent to which<br />
they incorporate sustainable choices. An international review panel<br />
will be engaged to oversee the implementation of the program.<br />
The sustainability rating is for VicRoads projects only and it will be utilised<br />
to establish benchmarks for future projects. The scope of the tool is currently<br />
limited to large construction projects and as with most sustainability tools,<br />
the maximum benefit will be obtained if it is used early on in the project.<br />
According to Dr Helen Murphy, Director, Environmental Sustainability,<br />
“the long term goal for INVEST is to raise the sustainability<br />
benchmarks across road construction projects and enable non-price<br />
attributes to be assessed as part of tender evaluation processes”.<br />
“It is envisaged that INVEST will be an evolving tool with changes reflecting<br />
industry standards, community expectations and new and emerging technologies”.<br />
For further information contact: Dr Helen Murphy, Director<br />
Environmental Sustainability (helen.murphy@roads.vic.gov.au)<br />
<strong>30</strong> ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
MORE POWERFUL & VERSATILE<br />
than any other in it’s class...<br />
ROADTEC<br />
COLD<br />
PLANERS<br />
Bringing unrivalled performance with the most<br />
powerful engine in it’s class and the versatility you<br />
have come to expect, the Roadtec Cold Planers<br />
deliver day after day.<br />
Facilitating traditional milling options and in addition,<br />
front-load downcutting and rear-load upcutting,<br />
Bi-Directional Milling makes increasing your green<br />
credentials possible while reducing your bottom line<br />
through cold in place recycling.<br />
Pentagon shaped cutting housing ensures quickly milled loads,<br />
a 60 degree conveyor swing allows dump trucks to be followed<br />
through tight turns, and simple hard wired electrics and gull<br />
wing engine doors allow for easy maintenance upkeep and<br />
access.<br />
When preparing for pavement re-lay in a powerful way or<br />
making best use of reclaimed aggregate and cutting costs, no<br />
other brand compares.<br />
Roadtec Cold Planer models available:<br />
RX900 RX700 RX500 RX400<br />
The ASTEC Family of Companies, Designs, Engineers,<br />
Manufactures and Markets Equipment used to Build and<br />
Restore the Worlds Infrastructure.<br />
For your total industrial design solution contact<br />
ASTEC AUSTRALIA today on<br />
07 3279 1422<br />
John Montague on 0419 965 077<br />
or David Smale<br />
enquiries@astecaustralia.com.au<br />
Astec Australia Pty Ltd ABN 13 1<strong>30</strong> 976 019<br />
P +617 3279 1422 F +617 3279 11<strong>30</strong><br />
PO Box 158 • 39 Neon Street<br />
SUMNER PARK • QLD • 4074<br />
ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011 31
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
LONG TERM FULL DEPTH ASPHALT<br />
PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE IN<br />
AUSTRALIA – Part 2<br />
By Ian Rickards and Peter Armstrong, <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Asphalt</strong> Pavement Association, Australia.<br />
In the February-March edition of <strong>Asphalt</strong><br />
<strong>Review</strong>, we published the first half of this<br />
paper which was presented at the 2010<br />
ARRB Conference.<br />
That instalment described the Long<br />
Term Pavement Performance studies and<br />
research programs conducted by AAPA<br />
in Australia since the middle 1980s, the<br />
findings of research work undertaken in<br />
Europe, and in particular at TRL, and<br />
commentary on a summary of findings on<br />
LTPP in Australia.<br />
This instalment begins with the authors’<br />
discussion of the implications from<br />
LTPP observations. It goes on to give us<br />
their recommendations and conclusions<br />
towards reaping the benefits for <strong>Australian</strong><br />
road users of the collective global studies,<br />
to yield continuous improvement and<br />
savings in the delivery of long life full<br />
depth asphalt (perpetual) pavements.<br />
An abstract of the full paper is<br />
included to put the second part of the<br />
paper into perspective.<br />
Abstract<br />
The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Asphalt</strong> Pavement<br />
Association, working with its members, has<br />
previously conducted extensive Long Term<br />
Pavement Performance (LTPP) studies of<br />
asphalt and composite pavements.<br />
The studies were designed to assist the<br />
validation and calibration of laboratory<br />
performance related tests, to enhance<br />
Full Depth <strong>Asphalt</strong> (FDA) pavement<br />
thickness design reliability, and to check<br />
the achievement of perpetual pavement<br />
conditions.<br />
All the LTPP sites were found to be in<br />
good to excellent condition after varying<br />
service to 40 years. The enormity of the<br />
work required for successful LTPP studies<br />
and a critical shortage of resources is a<br />
key finding. Considerable overseas LTPP<br />
efforts and research into the endurance<br />
limit of asphalt materials underpinning the<br />
Perpetual Pavement concept is Discussed.<br />
It is the author’s view that we must<br />
actively participate in and contribute to the<br />
overseas research effort if we are to realise<br />
the benefits in a reasonable timeframe.<br />
Implications from<br />
LTPP observational<br />
The implications from the <strong>Australian</strong><br />
LTPP findings are treated separately in the<br />
following sections firstly, as they relate to<br />
current FDA Perpetual Pavement design<br />
practice, and secondly as they relate to the<br />
AAPA research program.<br />
Ehanced FDA perpetual<br />
pavement design &<br />
construction — AAPA<br />
committed research<br />
It is now accepted that the FDA Perpetual<br />
Pavement is a legitimate technology,<br />
founded upo n the endurance limit<br />
principle, a basic engineering property that<br />
applies to numerous load bearing materials<br />
e.g. concrete and steel. The endurance<br />
limit (sometimes referred to as the fatigue<br />
limit) is the stress or strain level below<br />
which fatigue failure will not occur.<br />
This concept has been routinely<br />
applied in concrete pavement thickness<br />
design where it was assumed that life<br />
of the material is infinite if the ratio of<br />
applied stress and stress at failure is less<br />
than about 50%. In concrete pavement<br />
thickness design practice it meant that the<br />
majority (lighter end) of the traffic loading<br />
spectrum, theoretically, did not contribute<br />
to damage. In practice however the failure<br />
of concrete pavements is generally found<br />
to initiate at joints and non-load associated<br />
cracks where the entire traffic spectrum<br />
contribute to the progression of damage.<br />
The fundamental difference with a<br />
properly constructed FDA<br />
Perpetual Pavement is that there are<br />
no joints to degrade and the inherent<br />
flexibility and ability to dissipate strain<br />
substantial limits environmental cracking<br />
(noting that Australia additionally has<br />
a benign environment relative to the<br />
extremes, particularly cold, found in<br />
overseas structures).<br />
In the FDA Perpetual Pavement<br />
context various limiting strain values<br />
have been suggested for asphalt e.g. 70<br />
me (microstrain) to as high as 125 me in<br />
China (Yang et al 2005). Literature records<br />
this tentative value derived from the<br />
observations laboratory fatigue testing of<br />
asphalt since the 1970’s.<br />
The concept is illustrated in Figure<br />
2 where it is suggested that at strain<br />
levels below 70 me in the laboratory<br />
virtually infinite repetitions of strain<br />
fail to inflict damage i.e. there is no<br />
significant reduction in the stiffness of<br />
fatigue beam with loading cycles. In<br />
application it has been postulated that<br />
the FDA Perpetual Pavement condition is<br />
achieved if in the FDA thickness design<br />
process the combined strength of the<br />
asphalt and foundation materials (a<br />
function of modulus and thickness) results<br />
in a maximum tensile strain of 70 me at<br />
standard design conditions.<br />
<strong>Asphalt</strong> endurance<br />
limit concept Strain<br />
repetitions, strain<br />
magnitude (microstrain)<br />
Substantial research is current in the US<br />
and Europe to test the endurance limit<br />
concept and has resulted in significant<br />
refinements. The US work on the<br />
endurance limit at the NCAT full scale test<br />
32 ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
Sustainable Solututions<br />
are for the people we<br />
care about.<br />
Growing children deserve a cleaner environment.<br />
Responding to community and government concerns over the sustainability of<br />
our environment, Citywide is proud to deliver Greenpave - an advanced, easy to<br />
use and highly resilient warm asphalt mix.<br />
Produced at Citywide’s North Melbourne <strong>Asphalt</strong> plant - the most<br />
environmentally sensitive asphalt facility in the Southern Hemisphere,<br />
Greenpave answers the call for the creation of healthier and greener<br />
communities.<br />
Offering a wide variety of workplace safety and community health benefits,<br />
Greenpave has been successfully laid throughout metropolitan Melbourne,<br />
reducing harmful Co2 emissions to the equivalent of 1.6 million black balloons.<br />
> <strong>30</strong>% reduction in fume emissions<br />
> <strong>30</strong>% reduction in C02 emissions<br />
> Energy savings of up to 35%<br />
> Reduction of process temperatures of approximately 60C<br />
Greenpave – safer GREENER asphalt.<br />
citywide@citywide.com.au www.citywide.com.au<br />
ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011 33
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
Figure 2: Illustration of<br />
the laboratory endurance<br />
limit for asphalt materials<br />
facility is detailed in NCAT Report<br />
09-08, and supporting research in<br />
NCHRPReport 646.<br />
NCAT have undertaken detailed<br />
evaluation of their test track pavements in<br />
which the spectrum of traffic loading and<br />
asphalt strain gauge measurements has<br />
been monitored.<br />
Figure 3 is a plot of the cumulative<br />
distribution of asphalt tensile strain at<br />
the bottom of the nominated test sections,<br />
and compares it with the observed<br />
crack development.<br />
It is observed on the NCAT test sections<br />
that the distribution of strain tends to have<br />
two distinct forms, and that the sections<br />
that exhibit cracking suffer significantly<br />
higher strain levels over a greater<br />
percentage of the distribution.<br />
It is also observed that while test sections<br />
N1 and N2 exhibit top-down cracking the<br />
strain levels remain low relative to the<br />
other cracked section, suggesting the topdown<br />
cracking does not imply a significant<br />
reduction in structural capacity.<br />
Based on these data NCAT suggest<br />
the cumulative strain distribution is a<br />
more appropriate FDA Perpetual Design<br />
parameter. In application the designer<br />
would adopt an upper limiting design<br />
number e.g. based on their observations<br />
TRL data suggests 80 MSA on the premise<br />
that if the pavement is able to carry<br />
this traffic it has attained Perpetual<br />
Pavement status.<br />
The traffic and pavement temperature<br />
distribution is then determined and the<br />
strains calculated over the range of modulus<br />
relevant to the temperature profile and<br />
checked against the cumulative distribution<br />
profile in the following Figure 4.<br />
The following conclusions were drawn<br />
from the NCAT research:<br />
• Fatigue cracked sections had wider<br />
strain profiles when compared to<br />
the strain distributions of<br />
uncracked sections.<br />
• Higher magnitude strains govern fatigue<br />
cracking since many of the cracked and<br />
uncracked strain profiles were similar in<br />
the lower percentiles.<br />
Assuming similar traffic and fatigue<br />
characteristics, the preceding field-based<br />
strain profile should withstand fatigue<br />
cracking. Implementation of these findings<br />
beyond the scope of the Test Track requires<br />
further validation.<br />
The NCHRP Report 646 “Validating<br />
the Fatigue Endurance Limit for Hot Mix<br />
<strong>Asphalt</strong>” states “The objectives of this<br />
research were to (1) test the hypothesis<br />
that there is an endurance limit in the<br />
fatigue behavior of HMA mixtures, (2)<br />
measure the value of the endurance<br />
limit for a representative range of<br />
HMA mixtures, and (3) recommend a<br />
procedure to incorporate the effects of<br />
the endurance limit into mechanistic<br />
pavement design methods” The report<br />
provides methods to evaluate the<br />
endurance limit using laboratory<br />
beam fatigue and uniaxial tension<br />
testing using the AMPT. But clearly<br />
the application of the endurance limit<br />
is a work in progress as illustrated by<br />
the following. Recommendations from<br />
this study address the following five<br />
areas: (1) investigation of the endurance<br />
limit as a mixture property, (2) additional<br />
research and development to further<br />
the development of the uniaxial<br />
tension test (AMPT), (3) field testing to<br />
investigate cracking observed in thicker<br />
LTPP sections that appear to refute<br />
the existence of the endurance limit, (4)<br />
incorporation of the endurance limit<br />
into pavement design, and (5) cataloging<br />
endurance limit values.<br />
It is evident that the US researchers in<br />
particular have made significant advance<br />
in FDA Perpetual Pavement design,<br />
but that despite their considerable<br />
resources much is to be done. Relative<br />
to the <strong>Australian</strong> context it is the authors’<br />
view that the task simply to integrate the<br />
findings of the overseas developments<br />
will stretch our resources. We believe the<br />
solution is to initiate radical measures to<br />
increase our research resource base.<br />
The following initiatives by AAPA will<br />
assist on the local scene but it is the<br />
authors’ belief that Australia should seek<br />
active involvement and participation in<br />
studies such as those in place in the US<br />
and Europe.<br />
34 ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
100%<br />
90%<br />
80%<br />
Figure 3: Cumulative<br />
distribution of asphalt<br />
strain and cracking on<br />
2006 trial sections<br />
(NCAT report 09-08,<br />
figure 5.11)<br />
Percentile<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
<strong>30</strong>%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
N1 (Top-down)<br />
N2 (Top-down)<br />
N3 (No crackng)<br />
N4 (No cracking)<br />
N8 (Cracked)<br />
N9 (No cracking)<br />
N10 (Cracked)<br />
S11 (Cracked)<br />
0%<br />
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400<br />
Microstrain<br />
Figure 5.11. Cumulative Distribution of Strains for 2006 Structural Sections (29)<br />
Alliance with US LTPP researchers<br />
The <strong>Australian</strong> asphalt industry has maintained close relations<br />
with its US counterparts through the National <strong>Asphalt</strong> Pavement<br />
Association (NAPA) and their colleagues at NCAT. The NCAT has<br />
made substantial contributions to research to advance asphalt<br />
technology and practice.<br />
They are a free and generous source of scientific literature<br />
through their web site.<br />
Negotiations are underway to establish a formal alliance<br />
between AAPA and NCAT that will provide the framework under<br />
which <strong>Australian</strong> researchers will work with NCAT in the conduct<br />
of testing, data gathering and analysis.<br />
Interim recommendations - FDA mix<br />
design and construction methods<br />
After many decades of experience in the forensic analysis of<br />
flexible pavement failures the authors have concluded that<br />
the cause of premature flexible pavement failure is never as a<br />
consequence of a fundamental flaw in the asphalt pavement<br />
design process. When premature failure occurs in asphalt<br />
pavements it has been found, without exception, that any or all<br />
of the following factors are to blame; the wrong materials were<br />
supplied; the construction detailing was in error; construction<br />
quality was lacking; or, very rarely, traffic load conditions were<br />
substantially underestimated. The paper concludes by providing<br />
practical direction on fundamental construction issues to be<br />
employed in order to achieve perpetual asphalt pavements. In<br />
preparing for the design and construction of an asphalt pavement<br />
the designer, specifier and contractor, is urged to consult AS 2150<br />
– 2005; Hot mix asphalt - A guide to good practice. This document<br />
provides comprehensive and practical guidance. In addition the<br />
following bullet points provide suggestions which have derived<br />
from recent <strong>Australian</strong> experience on major projects. Some of<br />
the guidelines may not be relevant for smaller scale projects but<br />
may serve as pointers for discussion with the contractor. It is our<br />
Partnering with road paving businesses<br />
Adding value through focus, expertise and innovation<br />
Bitumen Polymer Modified Bitumen Bitumen Emulsions<br />
Polymer Modified Bitumen Emulsions Recycling Agents Rejuvinating Agents<br />
Joint & Crack Sealants Precoats Cutbacks Cold Mixes Dust Suppressants<br />
Laboratory Testing Services Research & Development Projects<br />
Sydney & Melbourne: ph +61 2 9638 0150 Perth: ph +61 8 9431 7351<br />
Brisbane: Bitumen Import Terminal ph: +61 7 3895 2183 Brisbane PMB/Emulsion plant ph: +61 7 3260 2622<br />
www.samibitumen.com.au<br />
ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011 35
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
100%<br />
90%<br />
80%<br />
Figure 4: Example of<br />
cumulative distribution<br />
of asphalt strain with<br />
confidence bands<br />
(NCAT report 09-08,<br />
Figure 5.13)<br />
Percentile<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
<strong>30</strong>%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
Average<br />
+15<br />
-15<br />
N3<br />
N4<br />
0 50 100 150 200 250 <strong>30</strong>0 350 400 450<br />
Microstrain<br />
Figure 5.13. Average Strain Distribution with Confidence Bands (29)<br />
experience that a successful outcome is<br />
generally assured if the asphalt contractor<br />
works in a partnering arrangement where<br />
his advice and experience is recognised.<br />
• Minimise layer interfaces by increasing<br />
layer thickness - increase layer thickness<br />
to 4 to 7 times Nominal Maximum<br />
Aggregate Size (NMAS) for lower layers<br />
(allowed under AS 2150).<br />
• <strong>Review</strong> mix design (fine side of AS 2150<br />
envelope suggested based on the authors<br />
research) and layer thickness to reduce<br />
permeability in asphalt base and<br />
binder courses<br />
• Maximum AC20 mix suggested – benefit<br />
of higher stiffness in large stone mixes<br />
potentially offset by permeability;<br />
tendency to segregation<br />
• Bitumen fog coat (emulsion with<br />
residual bitumen about 0.15l/m2<br />
recommended on asphalt base layers<br />
if exposure to rainfall likely<br />
• Heavy SAMI seals not necessary under<br />
OGAC; 7mm seal adequate<br />
• Consider permeability of substrate and<br />
shoulders; avoid localised water ingress<br />
and damming.<br />
• <strong>Asphalt</strong> cannot be laid with vertical<br />
unsupported edges – specify a 1:1 batter.<br />
• FDA generally requires a granular<br />
subbase (150mm CBR ≥ 20) with<br />
penetration prime to ensure bonding<br />
and assist with paving.<br />
• Cement modification (1½% cement<br />
maximum) of granular subbase if<br />
required to provide bearing capacity for<br />
construction equipment<br />
• Bitumen or emulsion stabilised<br />
aggregate subbase can be incorporated<br />
in structure<br />
• Interface of FDA and substrate must<br />
be bonded to comply with design<br />
assumptions – a prime or primer seal<br />
is considered vital<br />
• Lime stabilisation of clay subgrade<br />
materials can assist construction<br />
• Establish trial sections for major<br />
project and new mixes. Establish<br />
a database of mix designs for<br />
future reference.<br />
• <strong>Asphalt</strong> mixes in thin surface<br />
applications breathe – the same mix may<br />
hold water and strip in thick structures<br />
• Implement a QA system relevant to<br />
consistent high volume production on<br />
major projects i.e. typical testing and<br />
sampling regimes are excessive and<br />
should be reduced when the process is<br />
seen to be under control<br />
• Ensure design assumptions<br />
are achieved in the constructed<br />
pavement – this requires preagreed<br />
and costed testing protocols<br />
(understand the inherent variability<br />
and relevance of performance<br />
indicators such as modulus).<br />
Summary and conclusions<br />
The <strong>Australian</strong> LTPP study of 34 test<br />
sites where asphalt provided significant<br />
structural contribution revealed that all<br />
the pavements, some to 40 years, are in<br />
good to excellent condition, functionally<br />
and structurally.<br />
Reference is made to significant<br />
overseas research based on LTPP and<br />
extensive full scale field trials, into the<br />
asphalt endurance limit. This fundamental<br />
engineering property is considered to<br />
be the basis of the perpetual pavement<br />
concept. Accordingly the authors now<br />
accept the validity of the FDA Perpetual<br />
Pavement concept and believe it offers<br />
the community significant economic and<br />
performance benefit.<br />
Certainly much more LTPP and<br />
laboratory based materials research<br />
is warranted. New asphalt material<br />
characterisation tests and equipment have<br />
been implemented that provide better<br />
replication of field conditions that will<br />
assist the determination of more relevant<br />
performance measures e.g. the dynamic<br />
modulus of asphalt across the temperature<br />
and load spectrum. The asphalt industry<br />
through AAPA has initiated local and<br />
overseas alliances to increase the resources<br />
applied to the enhancement<br />
of the FDA Perpetual Pavement<br />
design reliability.<br />
36 ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
References<br />
AustRoads Pavement Design Guide (2004)<br />
AP-G 17/04 Pavement Design – A Guide to the<br />
Structural Design of Road Pavements.<br />
BS 598, Part 104. (1989) Methods of<br />
Test for the Determination of Density and<br />
Compaction.<br />
24th ARRB Conference – Building on 50 years of<br />
road and transport research, Melbourne, Australia<br />
2010 © ARRB Group Ltd and Authors 2010 16<br />
Butcher M & van Loon H (2003) A review of the<br />
determination of asphalt modulus for pavement<br />
design. Proc. 12th AAPA International Flexible<br />
Pavements Conference, Melbourne.<br />
Foley G (2008) Heavy Duty <strong>Asphalt</strong> Pavement<br />
Performance – Update Study. <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Asphalt</strong><br />
Pavement Association.<br />
AAPA responds<br />
to proposed<br />
carbon price<br />
Marchionna, A., Fornaci, M.G. and Malgarini,<br />
M. (1987). Evaluation of flexible pavements and<br />
overlay design based on FWD tests. 6th Int. Conf.<br />
Structural Design of Flexible Pavements<br />
NCAT Report 09-08; Phase III NCAT Test Track<br />
Findings (2008)<br />
NCHRP Report 465; Simple Performance Test for<br />
Superpave Mix Design (2002)<br />
NCHRP Report 646; Validating the Fatigue<br />
Endurance Limit for Hot Mix <strong>Asphalt</strong> (2010)<br />
Nunn M (1997) Long-Life Flexible Roads<br />
Proc 8th International Conference on <strong>Asphalt</strong><br />
Pavements, Seattle.<br />
Parry A, Phillips S, Potter J, and Nunn M (1997)<br />
UK Design of Flexible Composite Pavements.<br />
Proc 8th International Conference on <strong>Asphalt</strong><br />
Pavements, Seattle.<br />
Porter, K.F. and Armstrong, P.J. (1980). An<br />
Inspection Manual for the Pilot Inspection<br />
Procedure Design for the ARRB Road Condition<br />
Rating System. ARRB Internal Report, AIR 262-6.<br />
Rickards I J (2009) The Application of Laboratory<br />
Derived Performance Measures at Project Level.<br />
Proc 13th International <strong>Asphalt</strong> Pavement Conf,<br />
Gold Coast.<br />
Sharp K G & Tepper S B (2001) A Pilot Study of<br />
the Performance of Heavy Duty <strong>Asphalt</strong> Pavements<br />
in Service. ARRB Transport Research Contract<br />
Report RC90140-1.<br />
Theyse H L (1996) Overview of the South African<br />
Mechanistic Pavement Design Method Annual<br />
meeting of the US Transportation Research Board,<br />
Washington DC.<br />
Werner H (1995) Development of the <strong>Volume</strong> of<br />
Heavy Traffic with Time and its Effect on Behaviour<br />
in Use. Report of LTPP studies by the Bundesanstalt<br />
für Straßenwesen (BASt) presented at TRL<br />
workshop.<br />
Yang, Y. et al (2005) Perpetual Pavement Design<br />
in China. Proc International Conference on<br />
Perpetual Pavements, Ohio Research Institute for<br />
Transportation and the Environment.<br />
Youdale G P (2004); Heavy Duty <strong>Asphalt</strong><br />
Pavement Performance Study – Stage 2 Data<br />
Analysis. <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Asphalt</strong> Pavement Association.<br />
The Federal Government is working with<br />
independent and Greens MPs to establish<br />
a carbon price as the forerunner to<br />
introducing an emissions trading scheme.<br />
It is therefore essential that the<br />
bituminous surfacing industry maintains<br />
a close watch on progress to establishing<br />
the carbon price to ensure it does not<br />
unfairly impact on our industry. AAPA has<br />
established a working group to monitor<br />
and assess the proposed price. This group<br />
has also commented on the impact of the<br />
National Greenhouse Energy Reporting<br />
(NGER) legislation.<br />
One of the most important reasons for<br />
doing this is to ensure the government<br />
is aware that although bitumen is a<br />
hydrocarbon, it is not combusted and<br />
does not produce any greenhouse gas<br />
emissions. In fact, as those in our industry<br />
know, bitumen used in pavements is 100%<br />
recyclable and can be used back into<br />
pavements over and over again. Bitumen<br />
remains an ongoing resource for current<br />
and future generations. It is therefore<br />
critical that any carbon price does not<br />
inadvertently apply to the hydrocarbons<br />
in bitumen.<br />
Bituminous paving is already a very low<br />
source of greenhouse gas compared to<br />
other pavement types. For example; there<br />
is very little greenhouse gas associated<br />
with the manufacture of bitumen<br />
compared to other paving materials.<br />
Maintaining the wearing course of a<br />
bituminous surface can also be done<br />
with little energy compared to replacing<br />
the whole pavement as may be<br />
required with other pavement surfaces.<br />
Resurfacing can also be done quickly,<br />
causing minimal congestion and<br />
diversions, reducing greenhouse gas from<br />
vehicles. And with the growth in the use<br />
of warm mix asphalt and other energy<br />
saving practices adopted by industry,<br />
emissions will be further reduced.<br />
It is important that any carbon price<br />
that may impact on road surfacing include<br />
those emissions associated with the<br />
manufacture of the base materials used<br />
in paving as well as those associated with<br />
production, transport, placement and<br />
compaction of road surfaces.<br />
As most people in our community are<br />
aware, the government is proposing to<br />
introduce a carbon price legislation in the<br />
next few months. The Government sought<br />
comment on carbon pricing to assist in the<br />
development of the legislation. As a result,<br />
AAPA prepared a response.<br />
A full copy of that submission is<br />
provided. AAPA will, however, continue to<br />
monitor progress on this matter to ensure<br />
that should a carbon price be introduced it<br />
will be applied fairly and equitably to the<br />
pavement industry.<br />
ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011 37
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
Submission Letter:<br />
13 May 2011<br />
Dear Sir/Madam<br />
Re: Comments on the proposed Carbon Price Mechanism<br />
The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Asphalt</strong> Pavement Association (AAPA) represents<br />
all major industries and State Government Authorities associated<br />
with the bituminous surfacing industry. This industry is a multibillion<br />
dollar industry responsible for the surfacing of the vast<br />
majority of sealed roads across Australia. Its members include all<br />
major bitumen suppliers, asphalt and sprayed sealing companies<br />
(industry and government), state government road authorities and<br />
equipment suppliers.<br />
AAPA presents the following comments relating to bitumen and<br />
pavement surfacing on behalf of its members. However, it should<br />
be noted that many members are involved in a range of industries<br />
beyond bitumen and pavement surfacing and may submit<br />
individual comments. It should also be noted that these comments<br />
have been prepared quickly given the short period given for<br />
comments. Further interaction may be necessary as information<br />
on the proposed carbon price regulations becomes available.<br />
Introduction<br />
The bitumen/road surfacing industry supports the efforts<br />
of government to reduce impacts on the environment of<br />
greenhouse gas emissions. It also supports efforts to reduce other<br />
environmental impacts. The bituminous surfacing industry is<br />
a low emitter of greenhouse gas compared to other pavement<br />
surfacing methods. The industry, is also constantly seeking to<br />
further reduce its environmental footprint. For example two<br />
current major priority actions are to increase the use of recycled<br />
asphalt in new pavements and to reduce energy consumption<br />
through the use of warm mix asphalt.<br />
Increased use of recycled asphalt is an important means of<br />
reducing environmental impacts. The key components of a<br />
bituminous surface, bitumen and aggregates, are completely<br />
recyclable and can be used over and over again to create future<br />
new pavements. Industry is working with State Government road<br />
authorities to increase the use of recycled asphalt in road surfaces<br />
with the aim of reusing 100% of existing bituminous surfacing.<br />
This will reduce greenhouse emissions by reducing the need to<br />
produce new bitumen or extract stone from quarries and will<br />
eliminate the disposal of those materials to land fill.<br />
Industry is working with governments to advance the use<br />
of warm mix asphalt. Warm mix asphalt is made at lower<br />
temperatures than standard asphalt, requiring lower energy and<br />
reducing greenhouse gas emissions.<br />
AAPA also strongly supports increased investment in road<br />
maintenance to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Well<br />
maintained asphalt surfaces significantly reduce vehicle<br />
emissions. For example, studies in the US have shown that if<br />
roads in that country were better maintained there would be an<br />
overall fuel consumption saving of 4%, saving millions of tonnes<br />
of greenhouse gas each year. Better maintained roads in Australia<br />
would be expected to have similar savings.<br />
Despite this, the construction of bituminous road surfacing<br />
does produce some greenhouse gas emissions. If a carbon price<br />
is to be applied, AAPA strongly supports an approach that treats<br />
all industry equitably. The carbon price must also impose no<br />
unnecessary administrative burden on industry or the government<br />
agencies administering the relevant regulations.<br />
AAPA offers the following comments for your consideration.<br />
The carbon price should not apply to materials that produce no<br />
greenhouse gas Bitumen is a hydrocarbon and can be wrongly<br />
associated with other hydrocarbons that are combusted. Bitumen<br />
is not combusted and produces no greenhouse gas. Instead it<br />
remains as bitumen in perpetuity and can be reclaimed and<br />
reused in new road surfaces over and over again. Because of this,<br />
bitumen remains a valuable resource for current and<br />
future generations.<br />
Consequently bitumen should not be included in any<br />
calculation of a carbon price. AAPA therefore supports the<br />
previous arrangements in the proposed CPRS which excluded<br />
bitumen from the petroleum fuels provisions. Similarly any<br />
downstream use of bitumen should not be included. It is<br />
interesting to note that bitumen and the aggregate in pavements<br />
is the most recycled material in the US with nearly 100 million<br />
tonnes of asphalt recycled each year. Much of the material<br />
reclaimed from roads in Australia is also reused in new roads and<br />
industry and government are working together to increase that<br />
quantity.<br />
Recommendation: That there is no carbon price applicable to<br />
bitumen as it is not combusted and produces no greenhouse gas<br />
emissions.<br />
Relationship between a carbon price and NGER<br />
reporting requirements<br />
At present bitumen is a reportable energy source under the<br />
National Greenhouse Energy Reporting Act (NGER). However,<br />
NGER also recognises that bitumen is not combusted and<br />
therefore is assigned a zero value for greenhouse emissions. As<br />
such if NGER was used to assist in the identification of materials<br />
that would incur a carbon price or in the calculation of that price,<br />
care should be taken to ensure that bitumen is excluded.<br />
Further, should NGER be used as a basis for assisting in the<br />
identification of high energy users or greenhouse emitters, the<br />
energy assigned to bitumen should not be taken into account.<br />
Note, the recent review of NGER by the Department has<br />
concluded that bitumen used for road surfacing should be<br />
exempted from the reporting requirements. However, AAPA<br />
has been advised that this will require an amendment to the<br />
Regulations and may not be achieved this year.<br />
Recommendation: That the inclusion of bitumen in NGER is<br />
not used in determining a carbon price or industries required to<br />
pay a carbon price.<br />
Carbon price should be paid at the point of excise or customs<br />
duty of the greenhouse gas producing fuel, not by users of<br />
that fuel<br />
Where a carbon price is to be paid, AAPA recommends that it<br />
be paid at the point of excise or customs duty of that energy<br />
source. Greenhouse gas is produced in a number of ways by the<br />
community, industry, agriculture etc. It follows that the most<br />
38 ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
efficient administrative approach to paying a carbon price would<br />
be to require the producer or provider of that energy or energy<br />
source to pay the relevant cost. The alternative of requiring<br />
individuals or organisations that use energy would impose a large<br />
burden on the many users of energy and the government agencies<br />
administering the carbon price. It would also cause confusion as<br />
to who should pay the carbon price when a subcontractor, such<br />
as a road surfacing company, is working on behalf of a major<br />
contractor or the government.<br />
The complexity associated with end users paying the carbon<br />
price has been demonstrated in the application of the NGER<br />
Regulations. These have caused significant issues and complexities<br />
across industries, including in the pavement surfacing industry<br />
and these are still in the process of being resolved with the<br />
Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency and civil<br />
and construction industries.<br />
The optimal point of carbon liability for the emissions<br />
embodied in energy sources is with the upstream fuel supplier<br />
or energy producer, for example at the point of excise or customs<br />
duty, when fuel leaves a bonded premise such as at the terminal<br />
gate or power is produced at a power station. Bituminous<br />
surfacing companies would then pay any costs as an additional<br />
charge for the energy they use.<br />
Recommendation: Carbon tax should be paid by the energy<br />
source supplier or producer.<br />
Option to transfer liability<br />
Despite the comments above that the carbon price should be<br />
paid by the energy producer or supplier, there may be some<br />
situations when an individual company may wish to pay the<br />
carbon price itself. This may, for example, occur for large<br />
companies that have a policy or ability to offer significant carbon<br />
offsets. In this case, companies should be permitted to approach<br />
the energy producer or supplier, with the full knowledge of<br />
the Government, to take on the carbon liability. This is likely<br />
to be an option that would be considered by some large, multi<br />
operation companies and should be allowed under the proposed<br />
carbon price regulations.<br />
Recommendation: That a mechanism exists for individual<br />
companies to assume the liability to pay carbon taxes.<br />
Level playing field – Government and private industries<br />
The bituminous surfacing industry comprises some national<br />
companies and a wide range of regional or state based operations.<br />
Some of the larger single state operations are wholly owned<br />
government companies. For example one of the largest single<br />
state surfacing companies is the Brisbane City Council. Other<br />
major surfacing companies include Sprayline (wholly owned<br />
by the Victorian Government) and RoadTec (wholly owned by<br />
the Queensland Government). It is noted that under NGER<br />
government companies are currently not required to report.<br />
To ensure a level playing field in the pavement industry it is<br />
important that the carbon price is passed on to government and<br />
non-government industries.<br />
Recommendation: The impact of a carbon price must apply<br />
equally to government and private industries.<br />
Level playing field – Whole of Emissions associated with<br />
Road Construction<br />
It has been indicated that some materials that are produced<br />
overseas and in Australia may be exempt from a carbon price<br />
under EITE arrangements. While there will be many valid reasons<br />
for doing this it is important that the carbon pricing mechanism<br />
does not inadvertently impact on the competiveness of products,<br />
particularly where this may lead to carbon leakage. That is, by<br />
increasing the use of greenhouse intensive exempted materials.<br />
Should this occur it would contravene several of the MPCCC’s<br />
stated principles, including:<br />
• Competitiveness of <strong>Australian</strong> industries – by incentivising<br />
imported alternative products, over locally produced lower<br />
greenhouse emissions materials.<br />
• Fairness – by exempting one competitor from a carbon price<br />
while requiring the other to pay an increased cost.<br />
• Environmental effectiveness – by exempting a more carbon<br />
intensive product produced overseas from the carbon price,<br />
but including a locally produced product.<br />
• Economic efficiency – by applying carbon price to a material<br />
incentivises switching to an alternative exempted material.<br />
• It is vital that the carbon price exemption does not inadvertently<br />
promote products that may be more greenhouse intensive than<br />
alternative products.<br />
Recommendation: That carbon pricing and carbon price<br />
exemptions do not inadvertently impact on product or market<br />
competitiveness and do not promote more greenhouse intensive<br />
materials and activities.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The bituminous surfacing industry is a low greenhouse emitter<br />
which uses products that remain fully recyclable back into road<br />
surfaces and pavements. Indeed bitumen and aggregates used in<br />
pavements are able to be used over and over again, remaining a<br />
resource for current and future generations.<br />
These facts, and our emphasis on developing even lower<br />
greenhouse intense practices highlight the importance of<br />
minimising the impacts of any future carbon price on the<br />
bituminous surfacing industry, including ensuring that it is<br />
applied equitably.<br />
Should any further information be required please contact me<br />
on 03 9853 3595 or at john.lambert@aapa.asn.au.<br />
Yours sincerely,<br />
John Lambert<br />
Chief Executive Officer<br />
ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011 39
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
Have your skills<br />
formally recognised<br />
If you are an experienced supervisor<br />
of asphalt paving and compaction or<br />
bituminous sprayed treatment work, you<br />
could gain recognition of your skills with<br />
the help of AAPA’s Registered Training<br />
Organisation (RTO).<br />
Through AAPA RTO’s Recognition of<br />
Prior Learning (RPL) program you could<br />
be issued with a nationally recognised<br />
Statement of Attainment.<br />
If RPL confirms that you have the<br />
necessary knowledge and skills, you will<br />
be awarded either or both of the following<br />
units of competency:<br />
• RIICBS401A - Apply the principles for<br />
the asphalt paving and compaction,<br />
which covers the supervision of asphalt<br />
paving and compaction; and<br />
• RIICBS402A - Apply the principles for<br />
the application of bituminous sprayed<br />
treatments, which covers the supervision<br />
of bituminous sprayed treatments.<br />
Both of these are elective units from<br />
the RII09 Resources and Infrastructure<br />
Industry Training Package, which is a<br />
set of nationally-endorsed standards,<br />
qualifications and guidelines used to<br />
recognise and assess the skills and<br />
knowledge people need to perform<br />
effectively in the workplace.<br />
How RPL works<br />
RPL is a process by which your current<br />
skills, knowledge and experience, regardless<br />
of how they have been acquired, are<br />
recognised towards the achievement of<br />
national units of competency.<br />
You don’t need to sit an exam or repeat<br />
learning for skills and knowledge you<br />
already have. But you do need to provide<br />
information about your experience, have<br />
an interview with an AAPA RTO assessor,<br />
usually at your workplace, and bring along<br />
to your interview documents to help show<br />
you are competent.<br />
RPL eligibility<br />
To be eligible for RPL you should have:<br />
• at least two years experience in<br />
The RPL process<br />
supervising either asphalt paving and<br />
compaction or bituminous sprayed<br />
treatment tasks;<br />
• the knowledge and skills required to be<br />
awarded either unit RIICBS401A or unit<br />
RIICBS402A.<br />
To check if you have the required<br />
knowledge and skills go to www.aapa.<br />
asn.au/training, click on the ‘Recognition<br />
of Prior Learning’ tab and download and<br />
complete the ‘Self-evaluation: Supervisory<br />
Units’ form.<br />
40 ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
AAPA releases<br />
new Bitumen<br />
Burns Card<br />
If you have most of the knowledge and<br />
skills required for either or both of these<br />
units of competency contact the AAPA<br />
RTO to request an RPL application form.<br />
Building on your units<br />
of competency<br />
Units of competency can be packaged<br />
together to form a national qualification.<br />
Units RIICBS401A and RIICBS402A,<br />
for example, are both elective units<br />
in a number of qualifications in the<br />
RII09 Resources and Infrastructure<br />
Industry Training Package, including the<br />
qualification RII40709 Certificate IV in<br />
Civil Construction Supervision.<br />
If you are enrolled in a qualification<br />
or are interested in obtaining a full<br />
qualification, contact the AAPA RTO.<br />
We can advise you on how to combine the<br />
units of competency we offer with units<br />
from other RTOs to form a<br />
complete qualification.<br />
Future RPL units<br />
We are in the process of extending our<br />
RPL program to cover other bituminous<br />
surfacing competencies including those that<br />
cover:<br />
• supervising polymer modified binder<br />
tasks;<br />
• supervising pavement maintenance;<br />
• preparing sprayed seal surfacing<br />
designs; and<br />
• selecting pavement surfacing.<br />
Visit www.aapa.asn.au/training<br />
and click on the ‘Recognition of Prior<br />
Learning’ tab to check on our progress.<br />
Further information<br />
For further information about our RPL<br />
Program contact: Janine Stewart, AAPA<br />
RTO Manager; <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Asphalt</strong> Pavement<br />
Association; Level 2, 5 Wellington Street,<br />
KEW VIC 3101. Phone: 03 9853 395;<br />
Email: rto@aapa.asn.au<br />
Those in our industry know that working<br />
with bitumen can be dangerous due to<br />
its high temperatures and latent heat.<br />
We also know that the health and safety<br />
practices adopted by AAPA members<br />
across Australia are designed to protect<br />
workers from health and safety incidents.<br />
Zero harm is our goal.<br />
However, we recognise that we must<br />
also be prepared in the case of an<br />
incident, such as a bitumen burn, to<br />
respond quickly and appropriately.<br />
Thankfully bitumen burns are rare. But<br />
this means that most people, including<br />
hospital casualty staff, have little<br />
experience with them. AAPA has released<br />
a new Bitumen Burns Card. Information<br />
on the card and its format is based on<br />
the Downer EDI Works burns card and is<br />
used with their permission.<br />
The burns card should be carried in<br />
every vehicle that is associated with hot<br />
bitumen and asphalt. Some industry and<br />
government bodies also require that every<br />
first aid kit has a card.<br />
The card is double sided and made of<br />
water resistant paper – one side guides the<br />
immediate response by work colleagues<br />
and the other guides medical staff.<br />
If a burn occurs, the card should be<br />
read and the first aid actions followed. In<br />
particular, cold water should be applied<br />
to the affected area, taking care not to<br />
attempt to remove any of the bitumen.<br />
Considerable injury can occur if any<br />
attempt is made to remove the bitumen.<br />
An ambulance should be called to<br />
ensure the injured person is taken to a<br />
hospital as soon as possible. The card<br />
must then be attached to the person’s<br />
clothing and a work colleague must<br />
accompany the person to hospital to<br />
ensure that medical staff are made aware<br />
of the card and read the advice to<br />
medical practitioners.<br />
Copies of the card have been sent to all<br />
members and they can request additional<br />
cards to place in vehicles and first aid kits.<br />
VicRoads is one body that has requested<br />
large numbers and is committed to having<br />
a card in each first aid kit. The NSW RTA<br />
has also requested large numbers.<br />
Vicroads is also working with AAPA to<br />
develop a small, wallet size card with the<br />
first aid information. This card is intended<br />
to be carried by everyone involved in the<br />
pavement industry.<br />
As well as containing the first aid<br />
information, the wallet size card will refer<br />
to the larger burns card, advising that the<br />
full card should be obtained and attached<br />
to the injured person. This is a great<br />
initiative of VicRoads and will be made<br />
available to the whole industry once it has<br />
been printed.<br />
For copies of the Burns card, contact Loura<br />
at AAPA (loura.penna@aapa.asn.au).<br />
ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011 41
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
AAPA leads way in IMproving<br />
industry skills and knowledge<br />
AAPA continues to offer relevant training courses for all<br />
people involved in the flexible pavement industry.<br />
These courses incorporated in the program are relevant to<br />
asset supervisors and operator crews. They are also relevant<br />
to engineers, managers and any person associated with the<br />
placement of flexible pavements.<br />
Courses such as the Safe Handling of Bitumen courses<br />
are particularly relevant to new entrants, as well as to<br />
experienced hands who require refreshers.<br />
A key feature of AAPA courses is that they are designed and<br />
delivered by experts in our industry; people with many years<br />
of experience in asphalt and sprayed seal. They are delivered<br />
in a range of locations around Australia.<br />
AAPA also offers the flexibility to provide training to<br />
organisations in their own premises or at a time and place<br />
to suit their needs.<br />
If you wish to inquire about AAPA training or to discuss a<br />
customised course for your company, please contact AAPA<br />
(see the details at the bottom of the current course calendar).<br />
DATE COURSE LOCATION STATE COURSE<br />
CODE<br />
July<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
7<br />
12<br />
14<br />
21<br />
26<br />
August<br />
2<br />
5<br />
D D<br />
E E<br />
P M<br />
E O A<br />
N N N<br />
D D<br />
S<br />
Selection of Pavement Surfacing<br />
Pavement Maintenance Practices<br />
<strong>Asphalt</strong> Placement & Compaction<br />
Working Safely With Bitumen<br />
Working Safely With Bitumen<br />
Working Safely With Bitumen<br />
Working Safely With Bitumen<br />
Working Safely With Bitumen<br />
Working Safely With Bitumen<br />
Working Safely With Bitumen<br />
Working Safely With Bitumen<br />
Working Safely With Bitumen<br />
Working Safely With Bitumen<br />
Working Safely With Bitumen<br />
Sydney<br />
Sydney<br />
Sydney<br />
Perth<br />
Adelaide<br />
Melbourne<br />
Sydney<br />
Brisbane<br />
Toowoomba<br />
Roma<br />
Emerald<br />
Rockhampton<br />
Mackay<br />
Townsville<br />
NSW<br />
NSW<br />
NSW<br />
WA<br />
SA<br />
VIC<br />
NSW<br />
QLD<br />
QLD<br />
QLD<br />
QLD<br />
QLD<br />
QLD<br />
QLD<br />
TC1134<br />
TC1135<br />
TC1136<br />
TC1137<br />
TC1138<br />
TC1139<br />
TC1140<br />
TC1142<br />
TC1143<br />
AC1143<br />
9-11 Bituminous Surfacing – Principles and Practice Melbourne VIC TC1144<br />
16-18 Bituminous Surfacing – Principles and Practice Perth WA TC1145<br />
23-25 Bituminous Surfacing – Principles and Practice Brisbane QLD TC1146<br />
<strong>30</strong><br />
Selection of Pavement Surfacing<br />
Adelaide SA TC1147<br />
31<br />
Pavement Maintenance Practices<br />
Adelaide SA TC1148<br />
September<br />
1 <strong>Asphalt</strong> Placement & Compaction<br />
Adelaide SA TC1149<br />
6-8 Bituminous Surfacing – Principles and Practice Sydney NSW TC1150<br />
13 Polymer Modified Binders & Bitumen Emulsions Perth WA TC1151<br />
14 Pavement Maintenance Practices<br />
Perth WA TC1152<br />
15 <strong>Asphalt</strong> Placement & Compaction<br />
Perth WA TC1153<br />
25-28<br />
AAPA’s 14th International<br />
Flexible Pavements Conference<br />
Sydney NSW<br />
Training Courses can generally be fully customised to your requirements<br />
YOUR TOPICS, YOUR LOCATION and YOUR TIMING!<br />
Call the AAPA Training Centre for more details.<br />
Telephone: (03) 9853 5322 | Fax: (03) 9853 5914 | Email: trainingcentre@aapa.asn.au | www.aapa.asn.au<br />
42 ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011
Crack Sealing<br />
Line Marking<br />
Traffic Planning<br />
Anti-Skid Surfacing<br />
Repair Products<br />
NRS <strong>Asphalt</strong> Cold Mix. Now in buckets.<br />
ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011 43
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
Cold mix asphalt the solution for potholes<br />
Within Australia’s extensive road network, potholes present a<br />
significant problem to those responsible for maintaining roads.<br />
Potholes can lead to accidents and cause damage to vehicles.<br />
If not repaired in a timely manner they lead to further pavement<br />
damage which can become costly to repair. Potholes also take time<br />
to repair properly and can cause lengthy disruptions to traffic.<br />
The preferred material for use in long lasting pothole repair is<br />
hot mixed asphalt. However; circumstances don’t always allow for<br />
the use of hot mix asphalt, which isn’t always readily available for<br />
emergency repairs and can cause delays when used on roads with<br />
highly congested traffic.<br />
In these circumstances, the road asset manager might be forced<br />
to consider using alternative pot hole repair materials such as<br />
cold mixed asphalt. While conventional cold mix materials offer a<br />
quick-fix solution, their use is limited by their temporary nature.<br />
Boral has developed a solution to pothole repair problems<br />
called PPR. It is a special cold mix asphalt product manufactured<br />
locally using Macfix technology under license from Macismo<br />
International from the UK. Macfix cold mix asphalt technology<br />
has been proven throughout the USA, UK and South Africa.<br />
PPR can be placed in a pothole under any weather conditions<br />
– requires minimal preparation and no tack coat; is easy to<br />
compact; and can be immediately opened to traffic.<br />
Less equipment and labour is required to undertake the repair<br />
in comparison with hot mixed asphalt, and unlike conventional<br />
cold mix asphalt, PPR is not prone to shoving under traffic after<br />
placement. This reduces the need for recurring visits to repair<br />
the pothole.<br />
PPR can be placed under all weather conditions and compacted using<br />
a vehicle tyre to provide a durable repair.<br />
PPR has a shelf life which exceeds conventional cold mixes.<br />
When conducting repairs, any unused material can be stored<br />
for re-use. The product remains workable when properly stored,<br />
allowing it to be used for up to two years after the date of<br />
manufacture. During bulk storage, it forms a hard skin but the<br />
material becomes workable during handling. The benefit of PPR’s<br />
storage and reuse potential is the reduction in product wastage.<br />
PPR does not contain solvents or harmful materials and is<br />
applied at ambient temperature. This makes it safer to handle<br />
and apply by hand in comparison with hot or cold mix asphalt<br />
products which must be handled and applied at high temperatures<br />
or are manufactured using diesel or petroleum solvents.<br />
PPR can also be used for surfacing utility trenches, repairing<br />
asphalt car parks, driveways and side walks. For more<br />
information, visit www.boral.com.au or telephone 1800 555 445.<br />
<strong>Asphalt</strong> that plays a role in reducing greenhouse gases<br />
A price on carbon is regarded as an element of moves to reduce<br />
greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change.<br />
Even though Australia’s contribution to global emissions of<br />
around 1.5% is relatively small in caparison to other nations, its<br />
per capita emissions are among the highest in the world, and are<br />
ranked the highest among OECD countries.<br />
Australia has committed to reducing emissions to 60% below<br />
year 2000 levels by 2050, and is focussing on shorter term<br />
reductions by the year 2020. As part of the effort, Citywide is<br />
partnering with customers to help reduce C02 emissions and the<br />
subsequent carbon footprint of some it its key operations. It has<br />
offered the <strong>Australian</strong> market environmentally friendly asphalt<br />
(Greenpave), which achieves a <strong>30</strong>% reduction in fume emissions,<br />
a <strong>30</strong>% reduction in greenhouse gases, a 55% reduction in fine dust<br />
and energy savings of up to <strong>30</strong>%.<br />
Greenpave is manufactured by Citywide at its asphalt plant in<br />
North Melbourne. Launched in Victoria in 2008, Greenpave has<br />
undergone extensive trialling to assess its suitability by VicRoads,<br />
as well as municipalities including the Cities of Melbourne, Yarra,<br />
Wyndham, Darebin, Hobson’s Bay, Port Phillip and Boroondara.<br />
The trial period allowed government and the private sector<br />
the opportunity to test Greenpave under <strong>Australian</strong> climatic<br />
conditions. It was concluded that Greenpave was a suitable<br />
alternative to traditional and non-eco friendly asphalt mixes,|<br />
and that it be given conditional approval to be used as an<br />
asphalt alternative.<br />
Greenpave’s credentials are in its manufacture. Differing from<br />
traditional hot-mix asphalt processes which use one grade of<br />
bitumen that is heated to approximately 170°C, Greenpave uses<br />
two grades of binders, heated to a significantly lower temperature<br />
of ~110°C. The combined application of the binders results in a<br />
bitumen with the same performance as the conventional hot mix<br />
with the added environmental benefits.<br />
Since Greenpave is manufactured at approximately 60°C less<br />
than traditional hot mix asphalt, a number of environmental<br />
benefits are provided to the community:<br />
• over <strong>30</strong>% reduction in fume emissions during production;<br />
• over <strong>30</strong>% reduction in greenhouse gasses;<br />
• up to 55% reduction in fine dust;<br />
• energy savings of up to <strong>30</strong>%.<br />
Commencing production of the Greenpave mixture in 2008,<br />
Citywide has saved a total of 83,884kg of emissions. For further<br />
information, go to www.citywide.com.au.<br />
44 ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011
Boral aSPHalT<br />
Build something great <br />
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
Make a long-term mark<br />
on asphalt repair...<br />
Boral PPr ®<br />
cold mix asphalt<br />
Boral PPR ®<br />
is a durable cold mix asphalt for<br />
pothole and patch repairs. Boral PPR ®<br />
is easy to<br />
place, has no harmful solvents, has a long shelf<br />
life and is more cost effective than conventional<br />
cold mix asphalt products.<br />
For more information visit<br />
www.boral.com.au/asphalt/01<br />
a<br />
LONG-TERM<br />
FIX for <strong>Asphalt</strong><br />
BCC 05921_06_11<br />
ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011 45
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
New range of compact tandem rollers<br />
Cc1<strong>30</strong>0 with paver, Dynapac’s new CC1<strong>30</strong>0 articulated tandem asphalt roller is<br />
capable of following the range of Dynapac pavers.<br />
Dynapac launched its new range of articulated compact tandem<br />
rollers at Civenex last May in Sydney.<br />
The CC1100, CC1200 and CC1<strong>30</strong>0 feature a new water-cooled<br />
engine. The rollers have an operating weight of 2400kg to 3900kg<br />
and are available in two configurations throughout the range;<br />
with dual steel vibratory drums or as a combi version featuring<br />
one vibratory drum and four rubber tyres.<br />
Engineered primarily for asphalt compaction on streets and<br />
pavements in urban areas, the CC1<strong>30</strong>0 is also suitable for<br />
compacting sub-bases and base courses, and is adequate to follow<br />
a small paver.<br />
“Our aim is to offer reliable and modern compact tandem<br />
rollers and our new models bring more ergonomics, modern<br />
design and components,” said John Davison, National Sales and<br />
Marketing Manager – Dynapac.<br />
The large drum diameter makes them especially effective on<br />
soft asphalt compounds. In addition, the ratio of drum diameter<br />
to static linear load considerably reduces the risk of cracks. In the<br />
combi versions, the rubber tyres are operated in pairs by separate<br />
drive motors. This reduces the risk of marring newly laid asphalt<br />
when making sharp turns.<br />
The high clearance at the drum edge facilitates compaction<br />
close to high edges and gutters. When equipped with optional<br />
features, such as a sideways sliding seat and dual driving controls,<br />
there is a clear view of the edge of the drums.<br />
The new range is powered by water-cooled Kubota diesel engines<br />
which have a low noise level; especially important for night work.<br />
The rollers are equipped with a corrosion-free, impact-resistant<br />
water tank. Three separate filters alleviate the problem of clogged<br />
sprinkler nozzles, and the entire sprinkler system can be drained<br />
easily with a few simple hand operations.<br />
The new range features a redesigned control. Lower noise and<br />
vibration levels make operation more convenient. A low centre<br />
of gravity keeps the machines stable, and sturdy handgrips and<br />
boarding steps make it safer to get on and off the machine.<br />
For further information, telephone Atlas Copco Construction<br />
Equipment Australia on (02) 8805 6311 or email:<br />
tiffany.alderson@au.atlascopco.com<br />
National Road Sealing wins distribution deal<br />
National Road Sealing has been selected by the US-based<br />
manufacturer, Maxwell Products, as distributor of its Nuvo and<br />
Elastoflex asphalt crack and concrete joint sealing products in<br />
Australia and New Zealand.<br />
National Road Sealing is a pavement maintenance contractor<br />
with offices in New South Wales and Queensland.<br />
Crack Sealant plays an important part in prolonging the life<br />
of traffic infrastructure, as well as the numerous parking lots<br />
maintained by business and government. Crack sealing is a<br />
cost-effective way to keep asphalt roadways smooth and safe<br />
throughout their useful pavement lifetimes. Similarly, sealant<br />
extends the life of concrete joints by waterproofing, while<br />
allowing expansion and contraction with weather and the loads<br />
created by vehicles.<br />
The most effective sealants are the hot-applied type, which are<br />
heated to temperatures around 190°C in specialised transportable<br />
melters at the job site. The high temperatures allow the sealant<br />
to be liquid and flow easily during application, and to lose its<br />
“stickiness” to car and truck tires as it cools down.<br />
The high temperatures also help develop the properties of the<br />
sealants, which adhere to concrete and asphalt without sticking<br />
to tires and shoes.<br />
Sealants are also designed to stretch as pavement contracts and<br />
to compress when the pavement expands. The product must be<br />
resilient enough to expel small rocks and objects that might be<br />
pressed into the sealed crack by passing vehicles.<br />
Proper application is as important as the quality of the sealant<br />
and technicians need to be thoroughly trained to handle and care<br />
for the melters. Skill is also needed to properly identify the best<br />
treatment for a cracked area and to apply the correct remedy –<br />
different pavement issues require different approaches.<br />
For further information, go to www.nationalroadsealing.com<br />
or telephone 1<strong>30</strong>0 440 7<strong>30</strong>.<br />
46 ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011
ASPHALT REVIEW<br />
Focus on road asset management practices<br />
reliable data for roadway infrastructure management applications.<br />
Road geometry is one of many data sub-sets that can be<br />
collected using the ARAN technology. Road geometery has long<br />
been associated with the safety of the road and its direct effect<br />
on vehicle dynamics. Through measuring curvature, gradient,<br />
cross-fall and slope, road owners are able to calculate the sections<br />
of road that need additional safety measures due to visibility or<br />
traction related issues.<br />
A range of software solutions, developed by Fugro, allows<br />
clients to view and interact with their road asset condition<br />
data. iVision is a web-based application allowing clients to view<br />
actionable information from anywhere.<br />
Pavement management and maintenance budgets are limited<br />
and need to be managed effectively. iVision will complement a<br />
road infrastructure management program seeking to improve<br />
pavement longevity and safety, while reducing the amount of<br />
money it takes to accomplish that goal.<br />
For more information, call (02) 9674 9488 or visit<br />
www.fugropms.com.au.<br />
“Raising the inherent safety and protective quality of road<br />
networks” has been highlighted as one of the main action points<br />
of the recently declared United Nations Decade of Action for Road<br />
Safety Plan 2011 - 2020.<br />
Governments around the globe are being urged to implement<br />
measures to reduce the level of road fatalities. Action strategies<br />
such us community education, road infrastructure improvements,<br />
vehicle safety research and improvement of post crash care<br />
facilities, have all been identified as areas for the governments<br />
to focus on and improve.<br />
WHEN CAPABILITY COUNTS...<br />
...COUNT ON FUGRO PMS<br />
Efficient road condition monitoring and well planned<br />
maintenance programs have long been a discussion point of<br />
many road safety debates.<br />
Fugro PMS has been developing sustainable road asset and<br />
pavement management practices for over <strong>30</strong> years.<br />
Planned and programmed road condition inspections –<br />
conducted using high technology survey gear, such as Fugro’s<br />
ARAN system – provides an accurate and cost effective<br />
understanding of the condition of their infrastructure.<br />
The Fugro ARAN system is a network of tightly integrated<br />
subsystems that are used to synchronously collect accurate and<br />
• Flood Damage Assessment, Post Construction Testing<br />
• Pavement Condition Assessment<br />
• Airport PCN Assessment<br />
• Pavement Designs (SAR’s, Remaining Life, Treatment Options)<br />
• Pavement Deterioration Modelling<br />
• Structural Surveys (FWD / HWD)<br />
• Laser Profilometery Surveys<br />
• Visual Surveys<br />
• Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Surveys<br />
• Geotechnical Investigation<br />
Fugro PMS Pty Ltd<br />
Tel: +61 2 9674 9488<br />
Email: enquiries@fugropms.com.au<br />
www.fugropms.com.au<br />
ROADS JUNE/JULY 2011 47