Marking Scheme for Tender Evaluation

Tender ref.: AFCD/WP/01/09
Annex B
Marking Scheme for Tender Evaluation
Provision of Security Guard Services for the Hong Kong Wetland Park
(Tender Ref. AFCD/WP/01/09)
1. Marking Scheme for Tender Evaluation
The Government will use a Marking Scheme in assessing the tenders. The
weighted technical score will carry a weight of 30% as against a weight of 70% for
weighted price score. The overall passing mark for technical assessment is 50
before applying the 30% weighting for the weighted technical score. Tenderers
failing to obtain the passing mark of 4 in criteria 3 to 5, or the passing mark of 2 in
criteria 6 and 7, or the overall passing mark, will not be considered further. Upon
completion of the technical assessment, the price information will be evaluated.
Tender with the highest total combined score will normally be recommended for
acceptance.
.
2. Stage 1 Evaluation
(a). Completeness check of all tender will be conducted by checking whether the
Tenderer has submitted all items required for the tender as specified in Clause
3(c) of the Terms of Tender.
(b). A Tenderer who has failed to submit Part 4 of the Tender Form, Schedule 2 or 3,
or the plans required in Schedule 6, or Annex G, or failed to comply with Clause
6 or Clause 7(b) of the Terms of Tender will not be considered further.
3. Stage 2 Evaluation - Mandatory Requirements
A tender will not be considered further if it does not fulfil any of the following
mandatory requirements:
(a) Tenderers must have at least THREE (3) aggregated years of experience in
provision of security guard service in the past ten (10) years. The Tender closing
date will be the cut-off date for calculation of years of experience.
(b) Tenderers shall provide management plan, work plan, contingency plan, quality
assurance plan and transition plan for consideration by the Government as
specified in Schedule 6. Tenders will not be considered if any or all of the
aforesaid plans are not provided.

Tender ref.: AFCD/WP/01/09
Annex B
(c) A Tender will not be considered if on or after 1 May 2006 the Tenderer or any of its
shareholders was convicted of an offence under any of the following Ordinances:-
• the Employment Ordinance (Cap.57) and/or the Employees’ Compensation
Ordinance (Cap.282) convictions of which individually carries a maximum fine
corresponding to Level 5 or higher within the meaning of Schedule 8 to the
Criminal Procedure Ordinance (Cap.221);
• Section 17I(1) of the Immigration Ordinance (Cap.115);
• Section 89 of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance (Cap.221) and Section 41 of
the Immigration Ordinance (Cap.115);
• Section 38A(4) of the Immigration Ordinance (Cap.115); and
• Sections 7, 7A and 43E of the Mandatory Provident Funds Schemes
Ordinance (Cap. 485).
(d) A Tender will not be considered if a Tenderer has an aggregate of three (3) or more
demerit points received from one (1) or more Government Departments issued
against their non-compliance with contractual obligations in respect of wages, daily
maximum working hours, signing of standard employment contracts or wage
payment by means of autopay (payment by cheque is only allowed upon
termination of employment contract and is made at the request of the worker
concerned) during the period from 1 May 2006 up to the month preceding the
Tender Closing Date. For the avoidance of doubt, a demerit point will be taken
into account notwithstanding it is subject of any appeal or review to the review
panel of the relevant issuing Department.
(e) Tenderer shall be a company acting under and in accordance with a licence within
the meaning of the Security and Guarding Services Ordinance (Cap.460).
(f) Each of the two Supervisors nominated by the Tenderers in Annex D for provision
of Services under this Contract shall possess at least five (5) years experience at
the rank of security supervisor in security guard service, or disciplinary or military
service at the rank of supervisory level; experience with the Hong Kong Auxiliary
Police or other part time experience will not be counted; the Tender Closing Date of
this tender will be the cut-off date for calculation of years of experience.
(g) No submission of sub-contracting proposal as specified in Clause 5 of Notes for
Tenderers.
(h) A Tender shall not be accepted where the monthly wage rate (on the basis of 8 net
working hours per day and 26 working days per month) (excluding meal break and
rest time) proposed by the Tenderer in Schedule 3 for Security Guard for shift A, B,
C is less than $6,635* or the hourly wage rate proposed by the Tenderer in
Schedule 3 for Security Guard for shift D or E is less than HK$31.9*.(Remarks: *
figure on the Quarterly Report of Wages and Payroll Statistics of the Census and
Statistics Department – Sept 2008).

Tender ref.: AFCD/WP/01/09
Annex B
Notes:
For the purposes of the mandatory requirement set out in 3(a) above:
(i).
(ii).
(iii).
(iv).
Experience will be accepted regardless whether the Tenderer has gained it as a
prime contract or sub-contractor.
Experience acquired by a Tenderer as party to a joint venture (incorporated or
unincorporated) will not be accepted regardless of whether that joint venture was a
prime contractor or a sub-contractor.
The experience of a shareholder or joint venture party of the Tenderer (if the
Tenderer is an incorporated joint venture) will not be accepted. A tender submitted
by an unincorporated joint venture will not be accepted.
The experience of any sub-contractor proposed to be appointed by the Tenderer for
the Contract will not be accepted.
4. Stage 3 Evaluation - Technical Assessment
1.
Assessment Criteria
Year of experience in provision of
security guard service in the past
ten years. The closing date of this
tender will be the cut-off date for
calculation of years of experience
Maximum
Marks
Passing
Mark
Unit
Marks
Standard Mark (S)
(See Remarks 1)
(M) 3 2 1 0
Marks
Obtained
(MxS)
Remarks/
Basis of
Assessment
15 Nil 5 N.A See Note 1
2.
Valid and relevant ISO and/ or
OHSAS certifications in the
provision of security guard
service.
9 Nil 3 See Note 2
3. Management Plan 12 4 4 See Note 3
4. Work Plan 12 4 4 See Note 3
5. Contingency Plan 12 4 4 See Note 3
6. Quality Assurance Plan 6 2 2 See Note 3
7. Transition Plan 6 2 2 See Note 3
8.
Professional qualification of
supervisor(s) 15 Nil 5 See Note 4
9.
Proposed monthly wage level of
Guards for this contract 9 Nil N.A. See Note 5
Record of Demerit Points on or
after 1 May 2006 under all
10. Government contracts up to the
month preceding the Tender
Closing Date
4 Nil 4 N.A. N.A. See Note 6
Remarks :
1. Tenderer’s proposal/qualifications in respect of the features mentioned in the

Tender ref.: AFCD/WP/01/09
Annex B
assessment criteria will be rated as follows–
For Item 1:
Standard score of 3, 2, or 1 will be awarded.
For items 2 to 8
Standard score of 3, 2, 1or 0 will be awarded.
For item 10
Standard score of 1 or 0 will be awarded.
2. The total technical mark is 100.
3. The overall passing mark for technical assessment is 50 out of the total marks of 100.
Tenderers, who fail to obtain the passing mark of 4 in Criteria 3, 4 & 5, or passing mark of 2 in
Criteria 6 & 7, or the overall passing mark, will not be considered further.
4. A maximum weighted score of 30 would be allocated to the Tenderer with the highest
technical mark, while the weighted score for other Tenderers would be calculated by the
following formula-
Weighted
Technical
Score
Mark of the tender offer which is under evaluation and
which attained the pass marks in Stage 3
= 30 x Highest mark attained amongst tender offers which
attained the pass marks in Stage 3
Note 1 : 3 - 7 aggregated years or more
2 - 5 aggregated years or more but less than 7 aggregated years
1 - more than 3 aggregated years but less than 5 aggregated years
(Explanatory note: Experience of the Tenderer during the same period will only be
counted once)
Note 2 : 3 - Accredited to ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 in the provision of security
guard service.
2 - Accredited to any two of ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 or OHSAS 18001 in the provision of
security guard service.
1 - Accredited to any one of ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 or OHSAS 18001 in the provision of
security guard service.
0 - No accreditation to ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 in the provision of
security guard service or failure to provide documentary proof.
Note 3 : 3 - Proposed plan is practical and includes information with detailed explanation on each
item as listed in Schedule 6 and other good suggestions which will enhance the
services.
2 - Proposed plan is practical and includes information with detailed explanation on each
item as listed in Schedule 6.
1 - Proposed plan is practical and includes information with brief explanation on all items
as listed in Schedule 6.
0 - Proposed plan does not provide information on some of the items listed in Schedule 6.
Note 4 : 3 - Supervisor(s) possessing qualifications with documentary proof of the following three
items-
(a) having served in the military or disciplinary services;
(b) knowledge of fire fighting skills; and
(c) possesses Diploma in Safety & Health issued by a registered post-secondary
institution, or equivalent or valid first aid certificate.

Tender ref.: AFCD/WP/01/09
Annex B
2 - Supervisor(s) possessing qualifications of any two of the three items listed above.
1 - Supervisor(s) possessing qualifications of any one of the three items listed above.
0 - Unable to provide information or documentary proof of any of the above listed
qualifications of their supervisor(s).
(Explanatory Note: Marks will be scored based on the qualification of the supervisor(s)
with the minimum qualification, who is/are proposed by the Tenderer(s) in Annex G)
Note 5 :
A zero mark will be given to wage offers equivalent to the overall average monthly salary as
published in the Quarterly Report of Wage and Payroll Statistics. Additional marks might be
given for wage offers more than the overall average monthly salary as published in the
Quarterly Report of Wage and Payroll Statistics.
Note 6 : 1 - Having a clean and unblemished record on or after 1 May 2006 up to the month
preceding the Tender Closing Date.
0 - Having a blemished record on or after 1 May 2006 up to the month preceding the
Tender Closing Date.
5. Stage 4 Evaluation -Price Assessment
The calculation of weighted price score is:
Weighted Price Score = 70 x
Lowest Tender Price of the offer
which passed the Stage 3 evaluation
Tender Price of the offer which
passed the Stage 3 evaluation
6. Stage 5 Evaluation - Calculation of Combined Score
Total combined score =
weighted technical score + weighted price score

Tender ref.: AFCD/WP/01/09
Annex B
(BLANK PAGE)