21.01.2015 Views

Soil Generic Assessment Criteria for Human Health Risk ... - ESdat

Soil Generic Assessment Criteria for Human Health Risk ... - ESdat

Soil Generic Assessment Criteria for Human Health Risk ... - ESdat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

www.esdat.net Esdat Environmental Database Management Software +61 2 8875 7948<br />

3.5<br />

Derivation of GAC<br />

GAC were derived using the CLEA model v1.06. The recommended values from the pro<strong>for</strong>mas were transposed<br />

to the contaminant database in the CLEA model. A copy of the contaminant database used to derive the GAC<br />

is provided as a freely downloadable spreadsheet with this report. A summary of the contaminant database is<br />

provided in Appendix A. GAC were produced <strong>for</strong> those contaminants with recommended values <strong>for</strong> all the required<br />

parameters. Note that, with the exception of di-n-butyl phthalate (which has evidence of localised toxicological<br />

effects in the upper respiratory tract – see Section 3.7) the critical toxicity of all compounds is expected to be<br />

systemic. For this reason, where HCV were available <strong>for</strong> both the inhalation and oral routes of exposure, the<br />

combined GAC have been reported.<br />

The derived GAC and exposure contributions <strong>for</strong> each pathway calculated by CLEA v1.06 are presented in Tables<br />

4.1a to 4.4e. Note that the GAC have been rounded to two significant figures. The pathway exposure contributions<br />

have been reported to one decimal place and are intended to aid the risk assessor in determining the appropriateness<br />

of the GAC <strong>for</strong> the site-specific conceptual site model.<br />

Table 4.1a presents the GAC <strong>for</strong> the metals. As discussed in Section 3.4, it was considered beyond the scope of the<br />

project to collate and review plant concentration factors <strong>for</strong> the metals and there<strong>for</strong>e GAC have only been produced<br />

<strong>for</strong> land-uses that do not include plant uptake, i.e. the residential without homegrown produce and commercial<br />

land-uses. Note that the derived GAC <strong>for</strong> metals are not dependent on SOM.<br />

Tables 4.2a, 4.3a and 4.4a present the GAC <strong>for</strong> 32 organic contaminants assuming 1%, 2.5% and 6% SOM,<br />

respectively. These tables also present the estimated soil saturation concentration 3 <strong>for</strong> each contaminant (rounded<br />

to three significant figures). As discussed in the Environment Agency of England and Wales SR2 report, soil<br />

concentrations exceeding soil saturation may indicate the presence of non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) and this<br />

should be considered when assessing the risks to human health. The presence of NAPL could pose additional risks<br />

to human health that are not accounted <strong>for</strong> in the GAC, such as the inhalation of vapours arising from NAPL sources<br />

and direct contact with NAPL. Odours arising from NAPL may also be cause <strong>for</strong> concern.<br />

Methodology<br />

As discussed in Section 3.2, HCV were not always available <strong>for</strong> both the oral and inhalation pathways. Where<br />

this was the case and where considered appropriate the use of route-to-route extrapolation, whereby the HCV<br />

<strong>for</strong> the oral route is applied to inhalation exposures and vice versa, has been adopted. This has been done in the<br />

CLEA model by selecting “Y,Y,Y” <strong>for</strong> the recommended HCV in the contaminant database such that the estimated<br />

average daily exposures (including MDIs) <strong>for</strong> the oral, dermal and inhalation pathways are compared to this HCV<br />

to derive the GAC.<br />

3 The soil saturation concentration is the theoretical concentration at which soil vapour and/or pore water have become fully saturated. This can<br />

indicate that NAPL is likely to be present, but <strong>for</strong> contaminants that are strongly sorbed to soils (i.e. have high K oc<br />

) and that have a low aqueous solubility<br />

and vapour pressure, exceedence of the soil saturation concentration does not necessarily imply that NAPL is present.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!