21.01.2015 Views

Soil Generic Assessment Criteria for Human Health Risk ... - ESdat

Soil Generic Assessment Criteria for Human Health Risk ... - ESdat

Soil Generic Assessment Criteria for Human Health Risk ... - ESdat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

www.esdat.net Esdat Environmental Database Management Software +61 2 8875 7948<br />

1-Methylnaphthalene CAS Number: 90-12-0 Assessor A: Andreas Neymeyer,<br />

Buro Happold<br />

Assessor B:<br />

Mike Rogers, OPUS<br />

JOYNES PIKE Ltd<br />

Final review:<br />

Panel/SF<br />

Date 16/04/2009 Date 16/04/2009 Date 28/08/2009<br />

Oral Dermal Inhalation Combine Oral and<br />

Inhalation TDIs<br />

Justification<br />

Apply TDIoral to exposure routes<br />

Apply IDoral to exposure routes<br />

No No No<br />

Yes Yes No<br />

NR<br />

Chronic dietary studies with 1- or 2-<br />

methylnaphthalene provided limited evidence <strong>for</strong><br />

carcinogenicity. Recommended IDoral is lower than<br />

TDIoral, there<strong>for</strong>e Idoral adopted as oral HCV and<br />

applied to oral and dermal exposure.<br />

Apply TDIinh to exposure routes<br />

Apply IDinh to exposure routes<br />

No No No<br />

No No No<br />

No inhalation route health criteria value. Likely to be<br />

similar to naphthalene, i.e. inhalation orders of<br />

magnitude more toxic than oral<br />

TDI oral<br />

Recommended<br />

TDIoral<br />

Units<br />

7 ug.kg-1.d-1<br />

Justification<br />

USEPA PPRTV concluded that there was insufficient data to derive a provisional RfD but derived a provisional toxicity screening value that may be of limited use<br />

to risk assessors. Despite these uncertainties, the facts that (1) the PPRTV report is more recent than the ATSDR report, (2) the PPRTV screening value is more<br />

conservative and (3) the PPRTV screening value is closer to the EIC proposed HCVoral <strong>for</strong> 2-methyl naphthalene , results in the PPRTV screening value being<br />

recommended as the TDIoral.<br />

Organisation Web Link Last Updated Date Web Checked <strong>Health</strong> criteria type Value Initial Units CLEA units ug.kg-<br />

1.d-1<br />

US EPA Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity http://rais.ornl.gov/tox/unauthorized.shtml Jul-09 15/07/2009 Provisional toxicity<br />

0.007 mg/kg/day 7 LOAEL 71.6 mg/kg body<br />

Values (PPRTV)<br />

screening value<br />

weight per day<br />

Confidence rating Basis Value Units UF UF description Study type<br />

10000 Composite uncertainty factor (UF) of<br />

10,000, which includes factors of 10<br />

<strong>for</strong> extrapolating from a LOAEL to a<br />

NOAEL, 10 <strong>for</strong> interspecies<br />

extrapolation, 10 <strong>for</strong> interindividual<br />

variability,<br />

and 10 <strong>for</strong> database deficiencies.<br />

animal (mice)<br />

US Agency <strong>for</strong> Toxic Substances and Disease<br />

Registry (ATSDR) Toxicological Profiles and<br />

Minimal <strong>Risk</strong> levels<br />

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ Aug-05 27/03/2009 MRL (substancespecific<br />

Minimal <strong>Risk</strong><br />

Level)<br />

0.07 mg/kg/day 70 LOAEL 71.6 mg/kg body<br />

weight per day<br />

1000 10 <strong>for</strong> using a LOAEL, 10 <strong>for</strong><br />

extrapolating from animals to<br />

humans, and 10 <strong>for</strong> human variability<br />

animal (mice)<br />

TDI inhal<br />

Recommended<br />

TDIinhal<br />

n/a<br />

Units<br />

Justification<br />

No inhalation route health criteria value. [The reasonable presumption of 1-methylnaphtalene to be similar to naphthalene (regarding its chemical and<br />

toxicological properties) would suggest risks from 1-methylnaphtalene to be dominated by the inhalation pathway. However, no human or animal data are<br />

available regarding the toxicity of<br />

1-methylnaphthalene following repeated inhalation exposure.]<br />

Organisation Web Link Last Updated Date Web Checked <strong>Health</strong> criteria type Value Initial Units CLEA units ug.kg-<br />

1.d-1<br />

Confidence rating Basis Value Units UF UF description Study type<br />

US EPA Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity<br />

Values (PPRTV)<br />

http://rais.ornl.gov/tox/unauthorized.shtml<br />

No human or animal data are available regarding the toxicity of 1-methylnaphthalene following repeated inhalation exposure, thus precluding the derivation of provisional subchronic or chronic RfC values<br />

<strong>for</strong> 1-methylnaphthalene.<br />

ID oral Recommended IDoral Units<br />

2.3 ug.kg-1.d-1<br />

Justification<br />

Derived from BMDL10 <strong>for</strong> incidence of lung adenomas and carcinomas from Mutata et al 1993 study divided by uncertainty factor of 10,000, as recommended<br />

in Environment Agency SC050021/SR2 report, 2009<br />

Organisation Web Link Last Updated Date Web Checked Non threshold<br />

effects<br />

Basis<br />

<strong>Health</strong> criteria<br />

type<br />

Value Units Confidence rating<br />

Basis<br />

Study type<br />

US EPA Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity<br />

Values (PPRTV)<br />

http://rais.ornl.gov/tox/unauthorized.shtml Jan-08 15/07/2009 Cancer risk Lung adenomas or<br />

carcinomas observed<br />

during 81-week mice<br />

study<br />

Slope factor 0.029 (mg/kg/d) -1 Calculated based on a derived BMDL10 of 22.91 mg/kg/d<br />

animal (mice)<br />

ID inhal<br />

Recommended IDinhal Units<br />

n/a<br />

Justification<br />

Chronic dietary studies with 1- or 2-methylnaphthalene provided limited evidence <strong>for</strong> carcinogenicity.<br />

Organisation Web Link Last Updated Date Web Checked Non threshold<br />

effects<br />

Basis<br />

<strong>Health</strong> criteria<br />

type<br />

Value Units Confidence rating<br />

Basis<br />

Study type<br />

US EPA Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity<br />

Values (PPRTV)<br />

http://rais.ornl.gov/tox/unauthorized.shtml<br />

There are no appropriate human or animal data from from which to derive an inhalation unit risk <strong>for</strong> 1-methylnaphthalene<br />

Page 1 of 2 EIC pro<strong>for</strong>ma 1-methylnaphthalene.xls 28/08/2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!