Questionnaires (1) Questionnaire (for authors, reviewers, readers) In ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

5.1 If you previously answered "Yes", please indicate the service(s): __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ Part III (personal data) 1. Place of work (only country): _______________________________________________________________________ 2. Age Less than 20 Between 20 and 35 Between 36 and 50 More than 50 3. Degree: Student Graduation Master's degree PhD 4. Main occupation: Health professional Health technician Professor Researcher Student 5. Time of experience in the context of scientific research (in years): ____Years Thank you for your willingness to answer this questionnaire!
(2) Questionnaire (for editors) In the scope of a 1st year project of the Medical course of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Portugal, we would like to better understand what are the most valued services provided by online scientific journals for stakeholders. This questionnaire consists of three parts: characterization, relevance of services, and personal data. All personal data will be anonymized and the answers will be strictly confidential. Part I (characterization of the stakeholder) 1. How long have you worked as an editor _______ Years 2. How often do you access tools of scientific research (e.g., Pubmed or Scopus) Everyday Few times a week Few times a month Part II (The following questions refer only to online scientific journals) 1. Considering the way you are involved in an online scientific journal, are the provided services enough to help you with your needs Not at all Not quite Enough Very quite Completely quite 2. The following services are often available by online scientific journals. For each one of these services, select an option according to your opinion on average quality that journals present in this topic: a. Journal's archive: Very bad Bad Sufficient Good Very good b. Help for authors: Very bad Bad Sufficient Good Very good c. Information about the submission process: Very bad Bad Sufficient Good Very good
Page 1 and 2: Questionnaires (1) Questionnaire (f
Page 3: 3. Now, please evaluate the previou
Page 7 and 8: c. Information about the submission
Page 9 and 10: 5. In your opinion, is there any se
Page 11 and 12: g. Ajuda no processo de subscriçã
Page 13 and 14: h. Ligação a redes sociais: Irrel
Page 15: 3. Considera que existem aspectos n

Questionnaires (1) Questionnaire (for authors, reviewers, readers) In ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?