Papel de las actividades superóxido dismutasa y catalasa en la ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

[19] Villamil, L, Figueras, A, Planas, M and Novoa, B. Control of Vibrio alginolyticus in Artemia culture by treatment with bacterial probiotics. Aquaculture 2003; 219:43-56. [20] Al-Harbi, AH and Naim Uddin, M. Seasonal variation in the intestinal bacterial flora of hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus x Oreochromis aureus) cultured in earthen ponds in Saudi Arabia. Aquaculture 2004; 229:37-44. [21] Vázquez, JA, González, MP and Murado, MA. Effects of lactic acid bacteria cultures on pathogenic microbiota from fish. Aquaculture 2005; 245: 149-61. [22] Irianto, A and Austin, B. Use of dead probiotic cells to control furunculosis in rainbow trout, Onchorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). Journal of Fish Diseases 2003; 26:59-62. [23] Nikoskelainen, S, Ouwehand, AC, Bylund, G, Salminen S and Lilius, EM. Immune enhancement in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) by potential probiotic bacteria (Lactobacillus rhamnosus). Fish & Shellfish Immunology 2003; 15:443- 52. [24] Panigrahi, A, Kiron, V, Kobayashi, T, Puangkaew, J, Satoh, S and Sugita, H. Immune responses in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss induced by a potential probiotic bacteria Lactobacillus rhamnosus JCM 1136. Veterinary Immunology & Immunopathology 2004; 102:379-88. [25] Panigrahi, A, Kiron, V, Puangkaew, J, Kobayashi, T, Satoh, S and Sugita H. The viability of probiotic bacteria as a factor influencing the immune response in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture 2005; 243:241-54. [26] Salinas, I, Cuesta A, Esteban, MA and Meseguer, J. Dietary administration of Lactobacillus delbrüeckii and Bacillus subtilis, single or combined, on gilthead seabream cellular innate immune responses. Fish & Shellfish Immunology 2005; 19:67-77. [27] Díaz-Rosales, P, Salinas, I, Rodríguez, A, Cuesta, A, Chabrillón, M, Balebona, MC, Moriñigo, MA, Esteban, MA and Meseguer, J. Gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) innate immune response after dietary administration of heat-inactivated potential probiotics. Fish & Shellfish Immunology 2006; 20: 482-92. 16
[28] Burr, G, Gathin, D and Ricke, S. Microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract of fish and the potential application of prebiotics and probiotics in finfish aquaculture. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 2005; 36: 425-36. [29] Salinas, I, Díaz-Rosales, P, Cuesta, A, Meseguer, J, Chabrillón, M, Moriñigo, MA and Esteban, MA. Effect of heat-inactivated fish and non-fish derived probiotics on the innate immune parameters of a teleost fish (Sparus aurata L.). Veterinary Immunology & Immunopathology 2006; 111: 279-86. [30] Noya, M, Magariños, B, Toranzo, AE and Lamas, J. Sequential pathology of experimental pasteurellosis in gilthead seabream Sparus aurata. A light- and electron-microscopic study. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 1995; 21: 177-86. [31] López-Dóriga, MV, Barnes, AC, dos Santos, NMS and Ellis, AE. Invasion of fish epithelial cells by Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida: evidence for receptor specificity, and effect of capsule and serum. Microbiology 2000; 146: 21-30. [32] Díaz-Rosales, P, Chabrillón, M, Moriñigo, MA and Balebona, MC. Survival against exogenous hydrogen peroxide of Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida under different culture conditions. Journal of Fish Diseases 2003; 26: 305-8. [33] Elkamel, AA, Hawke, JP, Henk, WG and Thune, RL. Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida is capable of replicating in hybrid striped bass macrophages. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 2003; 15: 175-83. [34] Skarmeta, AM, Bandín, I, Santos, Y and Toranzo, AE. In vitro killing of Pasteurella piscicida by fish macrophages. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 1995; 23: 51-7. [35] Barnes, AC, Balebona, MC, Horne, MT and Ellis, AE. Superoxide dismutase and catalase in Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida and their roles in resistance to reactive oxygen species. Microbiology 1999; 145: 483-94. [36] Chabrillón, M. Estudio de la interacción de patógenos piscícolas y potenciales bacterias probióticas con las superficies mucosas de dorada (Sparus aurata L.). PhD thesis 2003. University of Málaga, Spain. 17
Page 1:
FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS DEPARTAMENTO D
Page 5:
Page 9 and 10:
Los ensayos que constituyen esta Te
Page 11:
- Díaz-Rosales, P, Arijo, S, Chabr
Page 15:
Sabe esperar, aguarda que la marea
Page 19 and 20:
ÍNDICE / INDEX Papel de las activi
Page 21:
ÍNDICE / INDEX 2. Photobacterium d
Page 25:
RESUMEN Photobacterium damselae sub
Page 29 and 30:
INTRODUCCIÓN 1. LA ACUICULTURA. EL
Page 31 and 32:
INTRODUCCIÓN saxatilis) (Hawke et
Page 33 and 34:
INTRODUCCIÓN 2.2. SINTOMATOLOGÍA
Page 35 and 36:
INTRODUCCIÓN las epidemias surgida
Page 37 and 38:
INTRODUCCIÓN et al., 1997). En P.
Page 39 and 40:
INTRODUCCIÓN 3.1. ESTALLIDO RESPIR
Page 41 and 42:
INTRODUCCIÓN radicales generados e
Page 43 and 44:
INTRODUCCIÓN Tabla 2 Ejemplos de m
Page 45 and 46:
INTRODUCCIÓN de parasitismo en el
Page 47 and 48:
INTRODUCCIÓN razón de la búsqued
Page 49 and 50:
INTRODUCCIÓN araquidónico, están
Page 51 and 52:
INTRODUCCIÓN simplificar la admini
Page 53 and 54:
INTRODUCCIÓN sino también cuando
Page 55:
INTRODUCCIÓN La necesidad de mejor
Page 59:
OBJETIVOS El trabajo planteado en e
Page 63:
MATERIA L Y MÉTODOS La metodologí
Page 67 and 68:
RESULTADO S Y DISCUSIÓN El primer
Page 69 and 70:
RESULTADO S Y DISCUSIÓN 1996; Lync
Page 71 and 72:
RESULTADO S Y DISCUSIÓN Una vez de
Page 73 and 74:
RESULTADO S Y DISCUSIÓN inmunoesti
Page 75 and 76:
RESULTADO S Y DISCUSIÓN cruentum s
Page 77 and 78:
RESULTADO S Y DISCUSIÓN permiten c
Page 79:
RESULTADO S Y DISCUSIÓN harían fa
Page 83 and 84:
CONCLUSIONES Tras los estudios real
Page 85:
Page 89:
ABSTRACT Photobacterium damselae su
Page 93 and 94:
INTRODUCTION 1. AQUACULTURE. THE CU
Page 95 and 96:
INTRODUCTION With regard to Solea s
Page 97 and 98:
INTRODUCTION 3.1. RESPIRATORY BURST
Page 99 and 100:
INTRODUCTION Some catalases have al
Page 101 and 102:
INTRODUCTION pathogens, study of th
Page 103 and 104:
INTRODUCTION increase their bacteri
Page 105 and 106:
INTRODUCTION 4.3.1. Porphyridium cr
Page 107 and 108:
INTRODUCTION Different mechanisms h
Page 109:
A I M S
Page 113:
M A T E R I A L S A N D M E T H O D
Page 117:
R E S U L T S A N D D I S C U S S I
Page 120 and 121:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION resist 100 m
Page 122 and 123:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION present work
Page 124 and 125:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION reason, once
Page 126 and 127:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION great number
Page 128 and 129:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION dominant spe
Page 131 and 132:
CONCLUSIONS Studies carried out on
Page 133:
R R E F E R E N C I A S E F E R E N
Page 136 and 137:
REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Aoki, T,
Page 138 and 139:
REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Bell, MV,
Page 140 and 141:
REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Dalmo, RA
Page 142 and 143:
REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Hamaguchi
Page 144 and 145:
REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Kono, Y &
Page 146 and 147:
REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Magariño
Page 148 and 149:
REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Ortuño,
Page 150 and 151:
REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Salinas,
Page 152 and 153:
REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Thompson,
Page 155:
S E C C I Ó N D E A R T Í C U L O
Page 159:
A RTÍCULO 1.1. A RTICLE 1.1.
Page 162 and 163:
Journal of Fish Diseases 2003, 26,
Page 164 and 165:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177:
A RTÍCULO 2.1. A RTICLE 2.1.
Page 180 and 181:
Abstract The stimulatory effect of
Page 182 and 183:
alga Porphyridium cruentum. For thi
Page 184 and 185:
Feeding assays were carried out wit
Page 186 and 187:
(10 8 bacterias ml -1 ) and used to
Page 188 and 189:
are in agreement with the data repo
Page 190 and 191:
unvaccinated fish. However, the ser
Page 192 and 193:
immune response of gilthead seabrea
Page 194 and 195:
[27] Duncan, PL and Klesius, PH. Ef
Page 196 and 197:
(Macrogard) and alginic acid (Ergos
Page 198 and 199:
[66] Salinas, I, Díaz-Rosales, P,
Page 201: Figure 1a 3 2.5 Stimulation index 2
Page 205: Figure 1c Stimulation index 3 2.5 2
Page 209: Figure 2b Stimulation index 3 2.5 2
Page 213 and 214: Effect of the extracellular polysac
Page 215 and 216: 1. Introduction Solea senegalensis
Page 217 and 218: On the other hand, β-1,3-glucan fr
Page 219 and 220: eaction was tested by adding supero
Page 221 and 222: Intraperitoneal inoculation of the
Page 223 and 224: defense mechanisms and protective i
Page 225: phagocytes from sole (Solea senegal
Page 229: Figure 1a Stimulation index 3 2.5 2
Page 233: Figure 2 Stimulation index 1.4 1.2
Page 237 and 238: Effect of dietary administration of
Page 239 and 240: 1. Introduction Senegalese sole cul
Page 241 and 242: 2.2. Fish and experimental design S
Page 243 and 244: 2.5. Challenge with Photobacterium
Page 245 and 246: the densitometric curves of the pro
Page 247 and 248: most efficient probiotics for aquac
Page 249 and 250: acterial diversity only the dominan
Page 251: [9] Verschuere, L, Rombaut, G, Sorg
Page 255 and 256: WB, editors. Techniques in Fish Imm
Page 257: and host-specific communities of ac
Page 261: Table 1 Primer Sequence (5’-3’)
Page 265: Figure 1b Stimulation index 2.5 2 1
Page 269: Table 2 Primer Control Pdp11 Pdp13
Page 273: Figure 3 Pearson correlation [0.0%-
Page 276: que perdieras parte de tu tiempo en
show all

Papel de las actividades superóxido dismutasa y catalasa en la ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?