Papel de las actividades superóxido dismutasa y catalasa en la ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

(Macrogard) and alginic acid (Ergosan) preparation on immune response in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Fish & Shellfish Immunology 2005; 18: 311-25. [48] Kumar, S, Sahu, NP, Pal, AK, Choudhury, D, Yengkokpam, S and Mukherjee, SC. Effect of dietary carbohydrate on haematology, respiratory burst activity and histological changes in L. rohita juveniles. Fish & Shellfish Immunology 2005; 19: 331-44. [49] Tachinaba, K, Yagi, M, Hara, K, Mishima, T and Tsuchimoto, M. Effects of feeding β-carotene supplemented rotifers on survival and lymphocyte proliferation reaction of fish larvae of Japanese parrotfish (Oplegnathus fasciatus) and Spotted parrot fish (Oplegnathus punctatus): preliminary trials. Hydrobiologia 1997; 358: 313-6. [50] Hardie, LJ, Fletcher, TC and Secombes, CJ. The effect of vitamin E on the immune response of the Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.). Aquaculture 1990; 87: 1-13. [51] Hardie, LJ, Fletcher, TC and Secombes, CJ. The effect of dietary vitamin C on the immune response of the Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.). Aquaculture 1991; 95: 201-14. [52] Ortuño, J, Esteban, MA and Meseguer, J. Effect of high dietary intake vitamin C on non-specific immune response of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.). Fish & Shellfish Immunology 1999; 9: 429-43 [53] Rodríguez, A, Cuesta, A, Ortuño, J, Esteban, MA and Meseguer, J. Immunostimulant properties of a cell wall-modified whole Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain administered by diet to seabream (Sparus aurata L.). Veterinary Immunology & Immunopathology 2003; 96: 183-92. [54] Jeney, G and Anderson, DP. Enhanced immune response and protection in rainbow trout to Aeromonas salmonicida bacterin following prior immersion in immunostimulants. Fish & Shellfish Immunology 1993; 3: 51-8. [55] Sakai, M, Yoshida, T and Kobayashi, M. Influence of the immunostimulant, EF203, on the immune responses of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, to Renibacterium salmoninarum. Aquaculture 1995; 138:61-7. [56] Aakre, R, Wergeland, HI, Aasjord, PM and Endersen, C. Enhanced antibody response in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) to Aeromonas salmonicida cell wall 18
antigens using a bacterin containing β-1,3-M-glucan as adjuvant. Fish & Shellfish Immunology 1994; 4: 47-61. [57] RØsrstad, G, Aasjord, PM and Robertsen, B. Adjuvant effect of a yeast glucan in vaccines against furunculosis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) Fish & Shellfish Immunology 1993; 3: 170-90. [58] Baulny, MOD, Quentel, C, Fournier, V, Lamour, F and Gouvello, RL. Effect of long-term oral administration of β-glucan as an immunostimulant or an adjuvant on some non-specific parameters of the immune response of turbot Scophthalmus maximus. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 1996; 26: 139-47. [59] Rodríguez, A, Cuesta, A, Esteban, MA and Meseguer, J. The effect of dietary administration of the fungu Mucor circinelloides on non-specific immune responses of gilthead seabream. Fish & Shellfish Immunology 2004; 16: 241-9. [60] Verschuere, L, Rombaut, G, Sorgeloos, P and Verstraete, W. Probiotic bacteria as biological control agents. Aquaculture 2000; 64: 1092-2172. [61] Irianto, A and Austin, B. Use of dead probiotic cells to control furunculosis in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). Journal of Fish Diseases 2003; 26: 59:62. [62] Díaz-Rosales, P, Salinas, I, Rodríguez, A, Cuesta, A, Chabrillón, M, Balebona, MC, Moriñigo, MA, Esteban, MA and Meseguer, J. Gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) innate immune response after dietary administration of heat-inactivated potential probiotics. Fish & Shellfish Immunology 2006; 20: 482-92. [63] Nikoskelainen, S, Salminen, S, Bylund, G and Ouwehand, AC. Characterization of the properties of human- and dairy- derived probiotics for prevention of infectious diseases in fish. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2001; 67: 2430-5. [64] Salinas, I, Cuesta, A, Esteban, MA and Meseguer, J. Dietary administration of Lactobacillus delbrüeckii and Bacillus subtilis, single or combined, on gilthead seabream cellular innate immune responses. Fish & Shellfish Immunology 2005; 19: 67-77. [65] Balcázar, JL, de Blas, I, Ruíz-Zarzuela, I, Cunningham, D, Vendrell, D and Múzquiz, JL. The role of probiotics in aquaculture. Veterinary Microbiology 2006; 114: 173-84. 19
Page 1:
FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS DEPARTAMENTO D
Page 5:
Page 9 and 10:
Los ensayos que constituyen esta Te
Page 11:
- Díaz-Rosales, P, Arijo, S, Chabr
Page 15:
Sabe esperar, aguarda que la marea
Page 19 and 20:
ÍNDICE / INDEX Papel de las activi
Page 21:
ÍNDICE / INDEX 2. Photobacterium d
Page 25:
RESUMEN Photobacterium damselae sub
Page 29 and 30:
INTRODUCCIÓN 1. LA ACUICULTURA. EL
Page 31 and 32:
INTRODUCCIÓN saxatilis) (Hawke et
Page 33 and 34:
INTRODUCCIÓN 2.2. SINTOMATOLOGÍA
Page 35 and 36:
INTRODUCCIÓN las epidemias surgida
Page 37 and 38:
INTRODUCCIÓN et al., 1997). En P.
Page 39 and 40:
INTRODUCCIÓN 3.1. ESTALLIDO RESPIR
Page 41 and 42:
INTRODUCCIÓN radicales generados e
Page 43 and 44:
INTRODUCCIÓN Tabla 2 Ejemplos de m
Page 45 and 46:
INTRODUCCIÓN de parasitismo en el
Page 47 and 48:
INTRODUCCIÓN razón de la búsqued
Page 49 and 50:
INTRODUCCIÓN araquidónico, están
Page 51 and 52:
INTRODUCCIÓN simplificar la admini
Page 53 and 54:
INTRODUCCIÓN sino también cuando
Page 55:
INTRODUCCIÓN La necesidad de mejor
Page 59:
OBJETIVOS El trabajo planteado en e
Page 63:
MATERIA L Y MÉTODOS La metodologí
Page 67 and 68:
RESULTADO S Y DISCUSIÓN El primer
Page 69 and 70:
RESULTADO S Y DISCUSIÓN 1996; Lync
Page 71 and 72:
RESULTADO S Y DISCUSIÓN Una vez de
Page 73 and 74:
RESULTADO S Y DISCUSIÓN inmunoesti
Page 75 and 76:
RESULTADO S Y DISCUSIÓN cruentum s
Page 77 and 78:
RESULTADO S Y DISCUSIÓN permiten c
Page 79:
RESULTADO S Y DISCUSIÓN harían fa
Page 83 and 84:
CONCLUSIONES Tras los estudios real
Page 85:
Page 89:
ABSTRACT Photobacterium damselae su
Page 93 and 94:
INTRODUCTION 1. AQUACULTURE. THE CU
Page 95 and 96:
INTRODUCTION With regard to Solea s
Page 97 and 98:
INTRODUCTION 3.1. RESPIRATORY BURST
Page 99 and 100:
INTRODUCTION Some catalases have al
Page 101 and 102:
INTRODUCTION pathogens, study of th
Page 103 and 104:
INTRODUCTION increase their bacteri
Page 105 and 106:
INTRODUCTION 4.3.1. Porphyridium cr
Page 107 and 108:
INTRODUCTION Different mechanisms h
Page 109:
A I M S
Page 113:
M A T E R I A L S A N D M E T H O D
Page 117:
R E S U L T S A N D D I S C U S S I
Page 120 and 121:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION resist 100 m
Page 122 and 123:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION present work
Page 124 and 125:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION reason, once
Page 126 and 127:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION great number
Page 128 and 129:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION dominant spe
Page 131 and 132:
CONCLUSIONS Studies carried out on
Page 133:
R R E F E R E N C I A S E F E R E N
Page 136 and 137:
REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Aoki, T,
Page 138 and 139:
REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Bell, MV,
Page 140 and 141:
REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Dalmo, RA
Page 142 and 143:
REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Hamaguchi
Page 144 and 145:
REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Kono, Y &
Page 146 and 147: REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Magariño
Page 148 and 149: REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Ortuño,
Page 150 and 151: REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Salinas,
Page 152 and 153: REFERENCIAS / REFEREN CES Thompson,
Page 155: S E C C I Ó N D E A R T Í C U L O
Page 159: A RTÍCULO 1.1. A RTICLE 1.1.
Page 162 and 163: Journal of Fish Diseases 2003, 26,
Page 177: A RTÍCULO 2.1. A RTICLE 2.1.
Page 180 and 181: Abstract The stimulatory effect of
Page 182 and 183: alga Porphyridium cruentum. For thi
Page 184 and 185: Feeding assays were carried out wit
Page 186 and 187: (10 8 bacterias ml -1 ) and used to
Page 188 and 189: are in agreement with the data repo
Page 190 and 191: unvaccinated fish. However, the ser
Page 192 and 193: immune response of gilthead seabrea
Page 194 and 195: [27] Duncan, PL and Klesius, PH. Ef
Page 198 and 199: [66] Salinas, I, Díaz-Rosales, P,
Page 201: Figure 1a 3 2.5 Stimulation index 2
Page 205: Figure 1c Stimulation index 3 2.5 2
Page 209: Figure 2b Stimulation index 3 2.5 2
Page 213 and 214: Effect of the extracellular polysac
Page 215 and 216: 1. Introduction Solea senegalensis
Page 217 and 218: On the other hand, β-1,3-glucan fr
Page 219 and 220: eaction was tested by adding supero
Page 221 and 222: Intraperitoneal inoculation of the
Page 223 and 224: defense mechanisms and protective i
Page 225: phagocytes from sole (Solea senegal
Page 229: Figure 1a Stimulation index 3 2.5 2
Page 233: Figure 2 Stimulation index 1.4 1.2
Page 237 and 238: Effect of dietary administration of
Page 239 and 240: 1. Introduction Senegalese sole cul
Page 241 and 242: 2.2. Fish and experimental design S
Page 243 and 244: 2.5. Challenge with Photobacterium
Page 245 and 246: the densitometric curves of the pro
Page 247 and 248:
most efficient probiotics for aquac
Page 249 and 250:
acterial diversity only the dominan
Page 251 and 252:
[9] Verschuere, L, Rombaut, G, Sorg
Page 253 and 254:
[28] Burr, G, Gathin, D and Ricke,
Page 255 and 256:
WB, editors. Techniques in Fish Imm
Page 257:
and host-specific communities of ac
Page 261:
Table 1 Primer Sequence (5’-3’)
Page 265:
Figure 1b Stimulation index 2.5 2 1
Page 269:
Table 2 Primer Control Pdp11 Pdp13
Page 273:
Figure 3 Pearson correlation [0.0%-
Page 276:
que perdieras parte de tu tiempo en
show all

Papel de las actividades superóxido dismutasa y catalasa en la ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?