important plant areas in central and eastern europe - Plantlife

important plant areas in central and eastern europe - Plantlife important plant areas in central and eastern europe - Plantlife

plantlife.org.uk
from plantlife.org.uk More from this publisher
21.01.2015 Views

Section 5 National IPA team IPA Coordinator: Danka Petrović (University of Montengro) Team members from the following organisations: University of Montenegro and the Natural History Museum Main Funders: REC through the ‘Plants Across the Borders’ Project Serbia and Montenegro – Montenegro By Danka Petrović Montenegro covers an area of almost 14,000 km 2 and has two biogeographic zones, the Mediterranean and the Alpine, with a strong Mediterranean influence. Montenegro borders Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Macedonia (FYR), Croatia and Serbia. Montenegro has a high degree of plant diversity with many national and Balkan endemics, and the natural and semi-natural habitats are characterised by forest (oak, beech and coniferous), grasslands, and coastal habitats on the Adriatic. Serbia and Montenegro is a member of the Council of Europe. Background to the project This project represents the first phase of IPA identification in Montenegro. The available data have been collated, potential sites identified, site reports written for eight IPAs, and an assessment of plant conservation policy in Montenegro completed. Further work to revise national criteria lists and to collect new data needs to be carried out. Several institutions, NGOs and individuals have expressed interest in continuing with the project. Potential IPAs and cross-border IPAs of Montenegro Current IPA statistics Total number of potential IPAs: 8 Number of cross-border IPAs: 1 with Macedonia (FYR) and 1 with Albania 74

Serbia and Montenegro DANKA PETROVIĆ Criteria and methodology Criterion A = 44 species were used Ai (2),Aii (10),Aiii (6),Aiv (26) Criterion B not applied in current project due to lack of data Criterion C=49threatened habitats were used Ci (6), Cii (43) The main challenges to applying the methodology were the lack of a national red lists, the representation of species and habitats in European legal documents, the translation of European habitat systems into the national classification system, and the age of the available data. However potential sites were identified using the available data, and the gaps and priorities for future fieldwork were assessed. Protection, threats and conservation issues Protected areas cover 7.2 % of Montenegro but there are still many problems with the protection of wild plants. Infrastructure and tourism are major threats, as are deforestation and lack of financing for forestry management, abandonment of land and depopulation of rural areas, poor agricultural practises and over exploitation of wild plant resources. Recommendations ■ Enlargement of the national IPA team. ■ Inclusion of lower plants and fungi in the identification of IPAs. ■ National IUCN Red Lists for threatened species should be prepared. ■ Workshops and training programmes aimed at building capacity should be held for the following subjects: • Application of IUCN Red List criteria; • Application of European habitat classification systems; • Key European and global legal frameworks, e.g. Bern Convention. ■ Carry out targeted fieldwork to provide new data and verify old data. ■ Mapping of relevant habitats. ■ Inclusion of IPAs in the national protected area network with appropriate management, beginning with the most threatened site. References Petrović, D. 2003 Report on the National Analysis of the Potential IPA Network in Montenegro, January 2003 (REC Project REREP 4.3.23.1) Petrović, D. 2004 Report on the National Analysis of the Potential IPA Network in Montenegro, September 2004 (REC Project REREP 4.3.23.1) Bijeli Nerini Bijeli Nerini is an IPA containing many threatened species, water and forest habitats, including high water quality indicator species and a quarter of the moss species known in Montenegro. The site is not currently protected. 75

Serbia <strong>and</strong> Montenegro<br />

DANKA PETROVIĆ<br />

Criteria <strong>and</strong> methodology<br />

Criterion A = 44 species were used<br />

Ai (2),Aii (10),Aiii (6),Aiv (26)<br />

Criterion B not applied <strong>in</strong> current project due to lack of data<br />

Criterion C=49threatened habitats were used<br />

Ci (6), Cii (43)<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> challenges to apply<strong>in</strong>g the methodology were the lack of a national red lists,<br />

the representation of species <strong>and</strong> habitats <strong>in</strong> European legal documents, the translation<br />

of European habitat systems <strong>in</strong>to the national classification system, <strong>and</strong> the age of the<br />

available data. However potential sites were identified us<strong>in</strong>g the available data, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

gaps <strong>and</strong> priorities for future fieldwork were assessed.<br />

Protection, threats <strong>and</strong> conservation issues<br />

Protected <strong>areas</strong> cover 7.2 % of Montenegro but there are still many problems with the<br />

protection of wild <strong>plant</strong>s. Infrastructure <strong>and</strong> tourism are major threats, as are<br />

deforestation <strong>and</strong> lack of f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g for forestry management, ab<strong>and</strong>onment of l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

depopulation of rural <strong>areas</strong>, poor agricultural practises <strong>and</strong> over exploitation of wild<br />

<strong>plant</strong> resources.<br />

Recommendations<br />

■ Enlargement of the national IPA team.<br />

■ Inclusion of lower <strong>plant</strong>s <strong>and</strong> fungi <strong>in</strong><br />

the identification of IPAs.<br />

■ National IUCN Red Lists for<br />

threatened species should be prepared.<br />

■ Workshops <strong>and</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programmes<br />

aimed at build<strong>in</strong>g capacity should be held<br />

for the follow<strong>in</strong>g subjects:<br />

• Application of IUCN Red List criteria;<br />

• Application of European habitat<br />

classification systems;<br />

• Key European <strong>and</strong> global legal<br />

frameworks, e.g. Bern Convention.<br />

■ Carry out targeted fieldwork to<br />

provide new data <strong>and</strong> verify old data.<br />

■ Mapp<strong>in</strong>g of relevant habitats.<br />

■ Inclusion of IPAs <strong>in</strong> the national<br />

protected area network with appropriate<br />

management, beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g with the most<br />

threatened site.<br />

References<br />

Petrović, D. 2003 Report on the National<br />

Analysis of the Potential IPA Network <strong>in</strong><br />

Montenegro, January 2003<br />

(REC Project REREP 4.3.23.1)<br />

Petrović, D. 2004 Report on the National<br />

Analysis of the Potential IPA Network <strong>in</strong><br />

Montenegro, September 2004<br />

(REC Project REREP 4.3.23.1)<br />

Bijeli Ner<strong>in</strong>i<br />

Bijeli Ner<strong>in</strong>i is an IPA conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g many threatened species, water <strong>and</strong> forest habitats,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g high water quality <strong>in</strong>dicator species <strong>and</strong> a quarter of the moss species known<br />

<strong>in</strong> Montenegro. The site is not currently protected.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!