important plant areas in central and eastern europe - Plantlife
important plant areas in central and eastern europe - Plantlife
important plant areas in central and eastern europe - Plantlife
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Section 5<br />
Recommendations<br />
■ Further development of the national<br />
IPA network, as <strong>in</strong>formation on new sites<br />
becomes available (80-100 more sites are<br />
expected to be added).<br />
■ More extensive <strong>in</strong>clusion of spore<br />
<strong>plant</strong>s <strong>and</strong> fungi <strong>in</strong>to the network.<br />
■ Larger scale application of Criterion B<br />
<strong>in</strong> identification of future sites.<br />
The quality of data <strong>and</strong> especially the long-term trend <strong>in</strong>formation varies considerably<br />
from site to site.The best <strong>in</strong>formation comes from sites that have been extensively<br />
studied by the scientific community, such as national parks <strong>and</strong> a few nature reserves, or<br />
those sites with rare or <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g species. However, s<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>in</strong>troduction of several<br />
monitor<strong>in</strong>g schemes such as Ramsar, NATURA 2000, <strong>and</strong> red list projects, data flow has<br />
notably <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>and</strong> the IPA programme will also be able to contribute to improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
trend assessments <strong>and</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g possibilities.<br />
Key threats to IPAs <strong>in</strong> Pol<strong>and</strong><br />
■ Establish<strong>in</strong>g a monitor<strong>in</strong>g programme<br />
for IPAs already identified.<br />
■ “Lobby<strong>in</strong>g” for <strong>in</strong>clusion of IPAs that<br />
are not otherwise protected <strong>in</strong>to some<br />
formal network of protected <strong>areas</strong>; if<br />
feasible, also promotion of <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
protection for sites with low levels of<br />
protection.<br />
No. of<br />
IPAs<br />
■ Actions towards secur<strong>in</strong>g permanent<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ancial support from the M<strong>in</strong>istry of<br />
Environment (or other sources), to<br />
guarantee the existence <strong>and</strong> development<br />
of the national IPA network.<br />
■ Integration of the nationally identified<br />
IPAs <strong>in</strong>to pan-European networks of<br />
protected <strong>areas</strong>.<br />
Tourist <strong>and</strong> recreation development is the s<strong>in</strong>gle most widespread threat to IPAs <strong>in</strong><br />
Pol<strong>and</strong> (68 IPAs). Inappropriate forestry practices affect 56% of IPAs (<strong>in</strong>tensified<br />
forest management (IFM) 53, deforestation 27, afforestation 25). Infrastructure <strong>and</strong><br />
transport development is also one of the most significant threats (56 IPAs), as well as<br />
urban development (45 IPAs) <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial development (38 IPAs). Inappropriate<br />
water management systems, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g dra<strong>in</strong>age, extraction, <strong>and</strong> canalisation, affect 49<br />
IPAs, <strong>and</strong> eutrophication affects 28 IPAs. Burn<strong>in</strong>g of vegetation <strong>and</strong> aquaculture <strong>and</strong><br />
fisheries also threaten IPAs <strong>in</strong> Pol<strong>and</strong>.<br />
50