21.01.2015 Views

important plant areas in central and eastern europe - Plantlife

important plant areas in central and eastern europe - Plantlife

important plant areas in central and eastern europe - Plantlife

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Belarus<br />

Methodology summary<br />

Criteria lists: Criterion A is based entirely on Aii, European threat, as Belarus does not<br />

currently have any globally threatened species or threatened endemics or near<br />

endemics.Translat<strong>in</strong>g the habitats lists from the Habitats Directive <strong>and</strong> the Bern<br />

Convention <strong>in</strong>to the national classification system was a major part of this project.<br />

Further work needs to be done to ensure that specific species <strong>and</strong> habitats from<br />

<strong>eastern</strong> Europe are fully <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to European <strong>and</strong> global threat lists.<br />

Data <strong>and</strong> fieldwork: ten sites were chosen on the basis of exist<strong>in</strong>g data for <strong>in</strong>tensive<br />

field <strong>in</strong>vestigation us<strong>in</strong>g the IPA criteria. New field data were collected by the IEB <strong>in</strong><br />

2003 <strong>and</strong> 2004.<br />

Site selection: the national site selection strategy focused on select<strong>in</strong>g larger sites, which<br />

conta<strong>in</strong> a high number of qualify<strong>in</strong>g criteria, <strong>and</strong> a complex of habitat types.<br />

Key issues: regionally relevant criteria lists for Belarus <strong>and</strong> <strong>eastern</strong> European countries<br />

need to be developed further.This is only the first stage of IPA identification <strong>in</strong> Belarus.<br />

Further work on identification will be required <strong>and</strong> this project will provide <strong>in</strong>valuable<br />

data <strong>and</strong> experience for the development of the IPA programme <strong>in</strong> the CIS region.<br />

Protection <strong>and</strong> management of IPAs<br />

Total IPAs with National National protection European International<br />

IPAs no legal protection of IPAs (lower level) recognition recognition<br />

protection of IPAs of IPAs of IPAs<br />

(high level)<br />

10 2 National Zakaznik (4) IBA* (4) Ramsar (2)<br />

Park (2)<br />

IBA= Important Bird Area; PBA= Prime Butterfly Area<br />

Zapovednik (2) PBA* (2) Biosphere<br />

Reserve (1)<br />

World Heritage<br />

Site (1)<br />

Two IPAs (20%) currently have no legal protection, four IPAs have a high level of national<br />

protection <strong>and</strong> four have a lower level of national protection. Several IPAs are<br />

recognised <strong>in</strong> European <strong>and</strong> International programmes. Eight IPAs are <strong>in</strong> protected <strong>areas</strong><br />

but secur<strong>in</strong>g appropriate site management is an <strong>important</strong> conservation issue. Effective<br />

site management plans need to be developed <strong>and</strong> implemented to benefit <strong>plant</strong><br />

conservation.<br />

Habitats <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> use at IPAs<br />

No. of<br />

IPAs<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!