21.01.2015 Views

important plant areas in central and eastern europe - Plantlife

important plant areas in central and eastern europe - Plantlife

important plant areas in central and eastern europe - Plantlife

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Summary of IPA data<br />

Damag<strong>in</strong>g forestry practises, which <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>tensified forest management, afforestation<br />

<strong>and</strong> deforestation, threaten almost half of IPAs.The threat to IPAs from <strong>in</strong>vasive species<br />

also comes <strong>in</strong> part from exotic trees species that take over exist<strong>in</strong>g forest habitats.<br />

Protection of forest IPAs <strong>and</strong> control of damag<strong>in</strong>g forestry practices must be a high<br />

priority for future conservation action at IPAs.<br />

Tourism <strong>and</strong> recreation development is the second most widespread threat to IPAs.The<br />

threat comes not only from facilities <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure but also from exceed<strong>in</strong>g carry<strong>in</strong>g<br />

capacity on nature trails <strong>and</strong> paths.Tourism is a powerful tool for rais<strong>in</strong>g awareness<br />

about nature <strong>and</strong> conservation, but needs to be developed with local l<strong>and</strong> managers <strong>and</strong><br />

specialists to prevent the destruction of priority sites.<br />

Agricultural <strong>in</strong>tensification or expansion (graz<strong>in</strong>g, mixed agriculture <strong>and</strong> arable) threatens<br />

almost one third of IPAs. L<strong>and</strong> ab<strong>and</strong>onment affects over a quarter of IPAs. Rare<br />

grassl<strong>and</strong> habitats are particularly vulnerable to ab<strong>and</strong>onment of graz<strong>in</strong>g or mow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

regimes.Agri-environment schemes <strong>and</strong> Rural Development Programmes have the<br />

potential to save both <strong>important</strong> grassl<strong>and</strong> habitats <strong>and</strong> the local communities that<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> them, if local, national <strong>and</strong> EU policy makers support <strong>and</strong> recognise the<br />

importance of a healthy, thriv<strong>in</strong>g countryside.<br />

Transport <strong>and</strong> urban development threaten one quarter of priority <strong>plant</strong> sites. National<br />

<strong>and</strong> EU transport planners <strong>and</strong> funders have the necessary <strong>in</strong>formation to avoid<br />

destroy<strong>in</strong>g priority sites yet even some Natura 2000 sites with a high level of protection<br />

are threatened by transport projects.The EU <strong>in</strong> particular has a responsibility to ensure<br />

that structural funds used for transport networks such as TEN-T do not destroy<br />

priority sites <strong>and</strong> contradict its commitments to biodiversity conservation.<br />

A high number of IPAs are threatened by damag<strong>in</strong>g water management practices such as<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>age, canalisation, <strong>and</strong> extraction.Wetl<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g peatl<strong>and</strong>s, are one of the most<br />

threatened <strong>and</strong> rapidly disappear<strong>in</strong>g habitats <strong>in</strong> Europe.A significant number of IPAs are<br />

also threatened by eutrophication or nutrient pollution, which often results from<br />

agricultural or <strong>in</strong>dustrial discharge <strong>in</strong>to water systems. Damage to wetl<strong>and</strong> ecosystems<br />

destroys not only the wetl<strong>and</strong> sites themselves but also the many other habitats which<br />

rely on these ecosystems.The EU Water Framework Directive can be used to prevent<br />

water pollution <strong>and</strong> also to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the ecological status of <strong>important</strong> wetl<strong>and</strong> sites.<br />

Ownership <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> use<br />

Almost half of IPAs are owned by state organisations (state 364 (46%), municipal 24<br />

(3%), military 7 (1%)). Many IPAs are also privately owned (private 187 (23%), religious<br />

groups 8 (1%)), <strong>and</strong> 69 (9%) are communally owned. 16 (2%) are owned by conservation<br />

organisations, <strong>and</strong> just over 10% of IPAs have mixed ownership or the ownership is<br />

unknown.<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!