important plant areas in central and eastern europe - Plantlife

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Section 3 IPA database Data collation strategy Each national team was asked to collect specific information on each site selected as an IPA, using the IPA questionnaire as the basis. Different countries had very different data availability and each country decided on their national data collation and collection strategy. In many countries the collation of data and selection of sites was made using existing national databases. In other countries the IPA central database and the IPA questionnaire were used as the basis for collating information and selecting sites. IPA central database The IPA central database is an on-line data entry system, and each national partner can download their country’s data into MS Access from the website. Each user of the database has a login password and use of the on-line site is governed by a data sharing agreement, which covers data ownership issues and confidential information. For each IPA, data is collected on the area, altitude, boundary, region where the site is located, general habitats, land-use, existing protection, threats, site management, qualifying criteria and details of the site compiler. Summary fact-sheets on each site are available, and it is possible to generate detailed statistics and reports from the background Access database.The IPA database is compatible with the Important Bird Areas database and was developed with assistance from BirdLife International. Development potential One of the most important potential developments for this database will be the public access facility.All developments will be made in consultation with partners. Fact-sheets for each IPA will be made available through the Plantlife International website, as well as up-to-date statistics on the sites, their features and their threats. Improving the facilities for national languages is also an important development area. Improving the public access to IPA information will ensure that decision makers and stakeholders will have the latest information on plant conservation benefits and threats. IPA public access information will also be forwarded to the EU and CBD clearing house mechanisms. 22
IPA database The online IPA database enables each partner to enter and read data from the different countries’ IPAs. 23
Page 1 and 2: IMPORTANT PLANT AREAS IN CENTRAL AN
Page 3 and 4: Acknowledgements Academy of Science
Page 5 and 6: Contents BRANO MOLNAR Contents Exec
Page 7 and 8: Executive Summary Executive Summary
Page 9 and 10: Executive Summary Recommendations:
Page 11 and 12: Introduction MONICA SARBU DANKA PET
Page 13 and 14: Introduction Transparency is one of
Page 15 and 16: Introduction DANA TURONOVA Threats
Page 17 and 18: Methodology BRANO MOLNAR BRANO MOLN
Page 19 and 20: Methodology Lichens There were 34 l
Page 21: Methodology IPA site selection crit
Page 25 and 26: Summary of IPA data 149 threatened
Page 27 and 28: Summary of IPA data IPAs and Key Bi
Page 29 and 30: Summary of IPA data Damaging forest
Page 31 and 32: Summary of IPA data IPAs and land u
Page 33 and 34: Summary of IPA data Number of IPAs
Page 35 and 36: Belarus Methodology summary Criteri
Page 37 and 38: Belarus OLEG MASLOVSKY Recommendati
Page 39 and 40: Czech Republic Criteria lists Crite
Page 41 and 42: Czech Republic Qualifying criteria
Page 43 and 44: Estonia Estonia By Mart Külvik, An
Page 45 and 46: Estonia Apart from nature conservat
Page 47 and 48: Poland Poland By Zbigniew Mirek Pol
Page 49 and 50: Poland Habitats and land uses No. o
Page 51 and 52: Romania Romania By Anca Sârbu Roma
Page 53 and 54: Romania Habitats and land use: No.
Page 55 and 56: Romania ANCA SARBU References: Jala
Page 57 and 58: Russia JONATHAN RUDGE Ongoing work
Page 59 and 60: Slovakia Methodology summary Criter
Page 61 and 62: Slovakia Of the 154 IPAs in Slovaki
Page 63 and 64: Slovenia Slovenia By Nejc Jogan Slo
Page 65 and 66: Slovenia Qualifying criteria for IP
Page 67 and 68: IPAs in South East Europe IPAs in s
Page 69 and 70: Bulgaria PETKO TSVETKOV Criteria an
Page 71 and 72: Croatia TONI NIKOLIC Criteria and m
Page 73 and 74:
Macedonia Criteria and methodology
Page 75 and 76:
Serbia and Montenegro DANKA PETROVI
Page 77 and 78:
Serbia and Montenegro Current IPA s
Page 79 and 80:
IPA Projects in other countries AND
Page 81 and 82:
Habitats and land uses ANCA SARBU
Page 83 and 84:
Habitats and land uses BRANO MONLAR
Page 85 and 86:
Habitats and land uses IPAs and for
Page 87 and 88:
Habitats and land uses Sustainable
Page 89 and 90:
Existing legislation & programmes I
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Contacts Contacts Plantlife Interna
show all

important plant areas in central and eastern europe - Plantlife

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?