important plant areas in central and eastern europe - Plantlife
important plant areas in central and eastern europe - Plantlife important plant areas in central and eastern europe - Plantlife
Section 2 NEJC JOGAN 20
Methodology IPA site selection criteria Criterion A(i) (threatened species) A(ii) (threatened species) A(iii) (threatened species) Description Site contains globally threatened species Site contains regionally (European) threatened species Site contains national endemic species with demonstrable threat not covered by A(i) or A(ii) Site contains near endemic/limited range species with demonstrable threat not covered by A(i) or A(ii) Threshold All sites known, thought or inferred to contain 5% or more of the national population can be selected, or the 5 1 ‘best’ sites, whichever is the most appropriate. Notes Species must be listed as ‘threatened’* on IUCN global red lists Species must be listed as ‘threatened’* on European IUCN red list; or Habitats Directive Annexes IIb & IVb;or Bern Convention Appendix I Species must be listed as national endemic (on any recognised list or publication) and ‘threatened’* on national red lists Species must be listed as near endemic/ limited range (on any recognised list or publication) and ‘threatened’* on national red lists Species richness based on nationally created list of indicator species created for each habitat type and from the following types of species: characteristic species and/or endemic species and /or nationally rare and scarce species (where the endemic and rare and scarce species are numerous and/or are characteristic for the habitat) Defined Habitat Type taken as level 2 (generic) habitat types in EUNIS (e.g. D1 raised & blanket bogs; G1 broad-leaved deciduous forests; E1 dry grasslands) A(iv) (threatened species) 1 (In exceptional cases, for example where there are less than 10 sites in the entire country or there are between 5-10 large populations of a species, up to 10 sites can be selected) (populations must be viable or there is a hope that they can be returned to viability through conservation measures) B (botanical richness) Site contains high number of species within a range of defined habitat types Up to 10% of the national resource (area) of level 2 EUNIS habitat types, or 5 2 ‘best’ sites, whichever is the most appropriate. 2 (In exceptional cases, for example there are between 5 and 10 exceptionally rich sites for a particular habitat, up to 10 sites can be selected for each level 2 habitat type) C(i) Priority threatened habitats Site contains threatened habitat All sites known, thought or inferred to contain 5% or more of the national resource (area) of priority threatened habitats can be selected, or a total of 20-60% of the national resource, whichever is the most appropriate. Priority threatened habitats are those listed as priority on Annex I of the Habitats Directive (and any corresponding habitat from the Bern Convention Res. 4) C(ii) Threatened habitats Site contains threatened habitat All sites known, thought or inferred to contain 5% or more of the national resource (area) can be selected, or the 5 3 ‘best’ sites, whichever is the most appropriate. Threatened habitats are those listed on Annex I of the Habitats Directive and the Bern Convention Resolution 4, not covered by C(i) 3 (In exceptional cases, for example where there are less than 10 sites in the whole country, or there are 5-10 exceptional sites, up to 10 sites can be selected) * Criterion A, threatened special must be listed as Critically Engangred (CR), Endangered (EN) or Vulnerable (VU) using the new IUCN criteria, or Extinct/Endangered (Ex/E),Endangered (E) or Vulnerable (V) using the original IUCN categories (pre 1994). Forest in Slovenia 21
- Page 1 and 2: IMPORTANT PLANT AREAS IN CENTRAL AN
- Page 3 and 4: Acknowledgements Academy of Science
- Page 5 and 6: Contents BRANO MOLNAR Contents Exec
- Page 7 and 8: Executive Summary Executive Summary
- Page 9 and 10: Executive Summary Recommendations:
- Page 11 and 12: Introduction MONICA SARBU DANKA PET
- Page 13 and 14: Introduction Transparency is one of
- Page 15 and 16: Introduction DANA TURONOVA Threats
- Page 17 and 18: Methodology BRANO MOLNAR BRANO MOLN
- Page 19: Methodology Lichens There were 34 l
- Page 23 and 24: IPA database The online IPA databas
- Page 25 and 26: Summary of IPA data 149 threatened
- Page 27 and 28: Summary of IPA data IPAs and Key Bi
- Page 29 and 30: Summary of IPA data Damaging forest
- Page 31 and 32: Summary of IPA data IPAs and land u
- Page 33 and 34: Summary of IPA data Number of IPAs
- Page 35 and 36: Belarus Methodology summary Criteri
- Page 37 and 38: Belarus OLEG MASLOVSKY Recommendati
- Page 39 and 40: Czech Republic Criteria lists Crite
- Page 41 and 42: Czech Republic Qualifying criteria
- Page 43 and 44: Estonia Estonia By Mart Külvik, An
- Page 45 and 46: Estonia Apart from nature conservat
- Page 47 and 48: Poland Poland By Zbigniew Mirek Pol
- Page 49 and 50: Poland Habitats and land uses No. o
- Page 51 and 52: Romania Romania By Anca Sârbu Roma
- Page 53 and 54: Romania Habitats and land use: No.
- Page 55 and 56: Romania ANCA SARBU References: Jala
- Page 57 and 58: Russia JONATHAN RUDGE Ongoing work
- Page 59 and 60: Slovakia Methodology summary Criter
- Page 61 and 62: Slovakia Of the 154 IPAs in Slovaki
- Page 63 and 64: Slovenia Slovenia By Nejc Jogan Slo
- Page 65 and 66: Slovenia Qualifying criteria for IP
- Page 67 and 68: IPAs in South East Europe IPAs in s
- Page 69 and 70: Bulgaria PETKO TSVETKOV Criteria an
Section 2<br />
NEJC JOGAN<br />
20
Change language