PROCEEDINGS - American Society of Animal Science
PROCEEDINGS - American Society of Animal Science
PROCEEDINGS - American Society of Animal Science
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Proceedings, Western Section, <strong>American</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />
Vol. 60, 2009<br />
EFFECT OF TARGETED USE OF A CONTROLLED INTERNAL DRUG RELEASING DEVICE (CIDR) IN AN<br />
ESTROUS SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEM FOR POSTPARTUM BEEF COWS<br />
J. B. Hall*, A. Ahmadzadeh, R. H. Stokes, J. K. Ahola, C. Stephenson, J. J. England, and J. B. Glaze, Jr.<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Idaho, Moscow, ID<br />
ABSTRACT: The objective <strong>of</strong> this experiment was to<br />
determine if BCS, age, and days postpartum could be used<br />
as criteria for inclusion <strong>of</strong> a CIDR in an estrous<br />
synchronization program. Crossbred postpartum beef cows<br />
(n = 216) were blocked by age and days postpartum and<br />
randomly assigned to CO-Synch+CIDR (CO) or modified<br />
CO-Synch+CIDR (Target) synchronization system. The<br />
CO-Synch+CIDR system consisted <strong>of</strong> an injection <strong>of</strong><br />
GnRH (Cystorelin ® , 100μg i.m.) and insertion <strong>of</strong> a<br />
controlled internal drug releasing device (Eazi-Breed<br />
CIDR ® , 1.38 g progesterone) on d 0. On d 7, CIDRs were<br />
removed and cows were given PGF2α (Lutalyse ® , 25mg<br />
i.m.). Cows were bred by fixed-time AI (FTAI) at 60 to 66<br />
h after CIDR removal with GnRH at AI. Cows assigned to<br />
the Target system received the same synchronization<br />
protocol as CO cows except: 1) cows in BCS ≥ 5, > 3 yr <strong>of</strong><br />
age, and > 50 d postpartum did not receive a CIDR (n =<br />
53), 2) detection <strong>of</strong> estrus occurred from CIDR removal<br />
until FTAI, 3) cows detected in estrus before FTAI were<br />
inseminated 12 h after observed estrus. All cows were fitted<br />
with Estrotect estrus detection aids. Pregnancy rates to AI<br />
were similar (P > 0.50) for CO (60.7%; 65/107) and Target<br />
(52.3%; 57/109) cows. There was a tendency (P = 0.09) for<br />
more cows to be in estrus before FTAI in the CO compared<br />
to Target system (62.6% vs. 50.5%, respectively). For cows<br />
detected in estrus, AI pregnancy rates were similar (P ><br />
0.50) among systems averaging 63.1%. In contrast, for<br />
cows not detected in estrus, more CO cows (P < 0.05) were<br />
pregnant to AI compared to Target cows (60.0% vs. 38.8%,<br />
respectively). Strategic use <strong>of</strong> CIDRs in the Target system<br />
reduced synchronization costs by $4.74 per cow. Also,<br />
estimated returns per 100 cows favored the Target system<br />
by $338. We conclude that targeted use <strong>of</strong> CIDRs can<br />
reduce cost <strong>of</strong> estrous synchronization without<br />
compromising AI pregnancy rate. However, overall return<br />
with the Target system should be considered.<br />
Key Words: Postpartum cows, synchronization, cost.<br />
Introduction<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> estrous synchronization and AI in<br />
commercial herds can improve calf marketability and cow<br />
productivity. Research trials or case studies reported<br />
enhancements in calf weaning weight, the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
cows calving in the first 21 days, and returns to cow as a<br />
result <strong>of</strong> estrous synchronization and/AI (Sutphin, 2007).<br />
Despite these benefits <strong>of</strong> estrous synchronization and AI,<br />
less than 8% <strong>of</strong> the US beef cow herds use estrous<br />
synchronization or AI (NAHMS, 2009). The principal<br />
reasons producers give for not using estrous<br />
synchronization or AI are labor and/or time (39.1% and<br />
37.7%, respectively) and cost (16.8% and 21.1%,<br />
respectively; NAHMS, 2009).<br />
Labor and time needed for estrous synchronization<br />
and AI is reduced by using systems that eliminate estrus<br />
detection and inseminate cows at a fixed-time (FTAI).<br />
The incorporation <strong>of</strong> a controlled internal drug releasing<br />
device (CIDR) into estrous synchronization greatly<br />
improved synchrony <strong>of</strong> estrus and pregnancy rates to FTAI<br />
(Chenault et al., 2003; Larson et al., 2006) In addition to the<br />
increased synchrony, the primary advantage <strong>of</strong><br />
incorporation <strong>of</strong> a CIDR in an estrous synchronization<br />
protocol is increased estrus response and pregnancy rates in<br />
acyclic females (Chenault et al., 2003)<br />
The percentage <strong>of</strong> postpartum cows cycling before<br />
the beginning <strong>of</strong> the breeding season is affected by age <strong>of</strong><br />
cow, days postpartum, and body condition score (Short et<br />
al., 1990). In a herd, a greater percentage <strong>of</strong> mature cows<br />
(≥ 4 yr) cycle before the breeding season compared with 2<br />
and 3 yr old cows. The percentage <strong>of</strong> cows cycling before<br />
the breeding season increases with increasing d postpartum<br />
(Short et al., 1990). Cyclicity is enhanced in postpartum<br />
cows with BCS ≥ 5 (1 = emaciated to 9 = obese) compared<br />
with cows with BCS < 5 (Richards et al., 1986). Therefore,<br />
mature cows in good body condition that calve early in the<br />
calving season should be cycling at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the<br />
breeding season.<br />
Many experiments compare the efficacy <strong>of</strong> estrous<br />
synchronization protocols on pregnancy rates to AI;<br />
however, few studies compare the relative cost <strong>of</strong> different<br />
protocols (Johnson and Jones, 2005, 2008) as well as their<br />
economic impact on cow and calf productivity.<br />
Incorporation <strong>of</strong> economic and calf performance data with<br />
reproductive data may increase producer adoption <strong>of</strong><br />
estrous synchronization systems.<br />
We hypothesized that estrous synchronization<br />
costs could be reduced by not using CIDRs in potentially<br />
cyclic cows, and that pregnancy rates and/or estimated<br />
returns to cow would not be affected by targeted use <strong>of</strong><br />
CIDRs. The objectives <strong>of</strong> this experiment were 1) to<br />
determine if BCS, age, and d postpartum could be used as<br />
criteria for inclusion <strong>of</strong> a CIDR in an estrous<br />
synchronization program, and 2) estimate the economic<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> targeted usage <strong>of</strong> a CIDR for estrous<br />
synchronization and AI.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Two hundred and sixteen crossbred postpartum<br />
beef cows were blocked by age and d postpartum and