21.01.2015 Views

PROCEEDINGS - American Society of Animal Science

PROCEEDINGS - American Society of Animal Science

PROCEEDINGS - American Society of Animal Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proceedings, Western Section, <strong>American</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />

Vol. 60, 2009<br />

EFFECT OF TARGETED USE OF A CONTROLLED INTERNAL DRUG RELEASING DEVICE (CIDR) IN AN<br />

ESTROUS SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEM FOR POSTPARTUM BEEF COWS<br />

J. B. Hall*, A. Ahmadzadeh, R. H. Stokes, J. K. Ahola, C. Stephenson, J. J. England, and J. B. Glaze, Jr.<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Idaho, Moscow, ID<br />

ABSTRACT: The objective <strong>of</strong> this experiment was to<br />

determine if BCS, age, and days postpartum could be used<br />

as criteria for inclusion <strong>of</strong> a CIDR in an estrous<br />

synchronization program. Crossbred postpartum beef cows<br />

(n = 216) were blocked by age and days postpartum and<br />

randomly assigned to CO-Synch+CIDR (CO) or modified<br />

CO-Synch+CIDR (Target) synchronization system. The<br />

CO-Synch+CIDR system consisted <strong>of</strong> an injection <strong>of</strong><br />

GnRH (Cystorelin ® , 100μg i.m.) and insertion <strong>of</strong> a<br />

controlled internal drug releasing device (Eazi-Breed<br />

CIDR ® , 1.38 g progesterone) on d 0. On d 7, CIDRs were<br />

removed and cows were given PGF2α (Lutalyse ® , 25mg<br />

i.m.). Cows were bred by fixed-time AI (FTAI) at 60 to 66<br />

h after CIDR removal with GnRH at AI. Cows assigned to<br />

the Target system received the same synchronization<br />

protocol as CO cows except: 1) cows in BCS ≥ 5, > 3 yr <strong>of</strong><br />

age, and > 50 d postpartum did not receive a CIDR (n =<br />

53), 2) detection <strong>of</strong> estrus occurred from CIDR removal<br />

until FTAI, 3) cows detected in estrus before FTAI were<br />

inseminated 12 h after observed estrus. All cows were fitted<br />

with Estrotect estrus detection aids. Pregnancy rates to AI<br />

were similar (P > 0.50) for CO (60.7%; 65/107) and Target<br />

(52.3%; 57/109) cows. There was a tendency (P = 0.09) for<br />

more cows to be in estrus before FTAI in the CO compared<br />

to Target system (62.6% vs. 50.5%, respectively). For cows<br />

detected in estrus, AI pregnancy rates were similar (P ><br />

0.50) among systems averaging 63.1%. In contrast, for<br />

cows not detected in estrus, more CO cows (P < 0.05) were<br />

pregnant to AI compared to Target cows (60.0% vs. 38.8%,<br />

respectively). Strategic use <strong>of</strong> CIDRs in the Target system<br />

reduced synchronization costs by $4.74 per cow. Also,<br />

estimated returns per 100 cows favored the Target system<br />

by $338. We conclude that targeted use <strong>of</strong> CIDRs can<br />

reduce cost <strong>of</strong> estrous synchronization without<br />

compromising AI pregnancy rate. However, overall return<br />

with the Target system should be considered.<br />

Key Words: Postpartum cows, synchronization, cost.<br />

Introduction<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> estrous synchronization and AI in<br />

commercial herds can improve calf marketability and cow<br />

productivity. Research trials or case studies reported<br />

enhancements in calf weaning weight, the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

cows calving in the first 21 days, and returns to cow as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> estrous synchronization and/AI (Sutphin, 2007).<br />

Despite these benefits <strong>of</strong> estrous synchronization and AI,<br />

less than 8% <strong>of</strong> the US beef cow herds use estrous<br />

synchronization or AI (NAHMS, 2009). The principal<br />

reasons producers give for not using estrous<br />

synchronization or AI are labor and/or time (39.1% and<br />

37.7%, respectively) and cost (16.8% and 21.1%,<br />

respectively; NAHMS, 2009).<br />

Labor and time needed for estrous synchronization<br />

and AI is reduced by using systems that eliminate estrus<br />

detection and inseminate cows at a fixed-time (FTAI).<br />

The incorporation <strong>of</strong> a controlled internal drug releasing<br />

device (CIDR) into estrous synchronization greatly<br />

improved synchrony <strong>of</strong> estrus and pregnancy rates to FTAI<br />

(Chenault et al., 2003; Larson et al., 2006) In addition to the<br />

increased synchrony, the primary advantage <strong>of</strong><br />

incorporation <strong>of</strong> a CIDR in an estrous synchronization<br />

protocol is increased estrus response and pregnancy rates in<br />

acyclic females (Chenault et al., 2003)<br />

The percentage <strong>of</strong> postpartum cows cycling before<br />

the beginning <strong>of</strong> the breeding season is affected by age <strong>of</strong><br />

cow, days postpartum, and body condition score (Short et<br />

al., 1990). In a herd, a greater percentage <strong>of</strong> mature cows<br />

(≥ 4 yr) cycle before the breeding season compared with 2<br />

and 3 yr old cows. The percentage <strong>of</strong> cows cycling before<br />

the breeding season increases with increasing d postpartum<br />

(Short et al., 1990). Cyclicity is enhanced in postpartum<br />

cows with BCS ≥ 5 (1 = emaciated to 9 = obese) compared<br />

with cows with BCS < 5 (Richards et al., 1986). Therefore,<br />

mature cows in good body condition that calve early in the<br />

calving season should be cycling at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the<br />

breeding season.<br />

Many experiments compare the efficacy <strong>of</strong> estrous<br />

synchronization protocols on pregnancy rates to AI;<br />

however, few studies compare the relative cost <strong>of</strong> different<br />

protocols (Johnson and Jones, 2005, 2008) as well as their<br />

economic impact on cow and calf productivity.<br />

Incorporation <strong>of</strong> economic and calf performance data with<br />

reproductive data may increase producer adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

estrous synchronization systems.<br />

We hypothesized that estrous synchronization<br />

costs could be reduced by not using CIDRs in potentially<br />

cyclic cows, and that pregnancy rates and/or estimated<br />

returns to cow would not be affected by targeted use <strong>of</strong><br />

CIDRs. The objectives <strong>of</strong> this experiment were 1) to<br />

determine if BCS, age, and d postpartum could be used as<br />

criteria for inclusion <strong>of</strong> a CIDR in an estrous<br />

synchronization program, and 2) estimate the economic<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> targeted usage <strong>of</strong> a CIDR for estrous<br />

synchronization and AI.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Two hundred and sixteen crossbred postpartum<br />

beef cows were blocked by age and d postpartum and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!