NoetixViews for Oracle Payables - Noetix Technical Support

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PAY_Accruals does not support DML statements in formulas. To show correct results for accrual plans, the PAY_Accruals view uses Oracle Payroll formulas that have been defined for each benefit accrual plan. Users can customize these formulas according to business needs. However, if customization involves the use of Data Manipulation Language (DML) statements (such as inserts, updates, or deletes), the view will malfunction. The PAY_Accruals view is designed to use only formulas without DML statements. For a solution, consider not altering the formulas and instead relocating DML statements elsewhere. Otherwise, contact Noetix Technical Support to request a quote for a billable customization that alters the Noetix Payroll Data Mart and the PAY_Accruals view for support of customized formulas. [13879] XOP form of RA_Customers returns multiple records. The XOP form of the RA_Customers view returns a record for each active, primary bill-to address defined for a customer in an operating unit. This known issue also occurs if the XOP form of this view is joined to the XOP form of other views. For a workaround to this problem in XOP views, use the Operating_Unit_Name column as a foreign key in the query that joins the XOP form of the views. [19627] EAM_WO_Cost_Details returns incorrect data. If a resource is associated with an operation sequence multiple times through different resource sequence numbers, the view returns incorrect data. This issue will be fixed in a future release. [23394] Oracle Database 9.2.x causes errors in views for Human Resources. On Oracle Database versions 9.2.0.3 and 9.2.0.4, views for Oracle Human Resources that use hierarchical structures, such as organizations and positions, may not work correctly, and the following error may appear: “ORA-01436: CONNECT BY loop in user data”. This error is due to a bug in the Oracle Database that first appeared in version 9.0.1.1.1 and was subsequently fixed with database patches. This bug reappeared in version 9.2.x of the database. At the time of this release, a patch from Oracle Corporation was unavailable for this bug. The affected views are HR_Org_Hierarchies, HR_Pos_Hier_Elem, and HR_Pos_Hierarchies. [11243] Error about check constraint logged. When Noetix views are generated or regenerated or when preupd.sql is run, if there are more than 1,000 Noetix roles, an error message similar to the following is logged: “ORA-02290: check constraint (…) violated”. Contact Noetix Technical Support for a workaround. [14432] Noetix Corporation 8 support.noetix.com
Views for Order Management have performance problems in version 11.5, later. Some Noetix views for Oracle Order Management have performance-related problems in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5 and later. Order statuses are retrieved from the WF_ITEM_ACTIVITY STATUSES and WF_PROCESS_ACTIVITIES tables; the volume and distribution of data in these tables affect performance of these Noetix views. Sometimes, order statuses are retrieved from these tables repeatedly, and retrieval of each order status requires a separate join to Oracle Workflow tables. The affected views are OE_Lines, OE_Order_Territories, and OE_Orders; OE_Order_Line_Status and OE_Order_Status may also be affected. Try one of the following workarounds: • Gather statistics for the ONT schema, using a sample size ranging from 30 to 51 percent. • Purge obsolete information from the Workflow tables, as recommended by Oracle. These tables can become quite large, and their size directly affects performance of the views. For troubleshooting issues pertaining to workflow data growth, see Note 298550.1 on Oracle MetaLink. • Substitute the Workflow tables used by the affected views with a materialized view or an equivalent data mart view. • Contact Noetix Technical Support for billable customizations of the affected views so that they do not use the order-status columns (sourced from the Workflow tables). [15994] Queries for Purchasing views may work incorrectly after upgrade to 11.5.10. After Oracle E-Business Suite is upgraded to version 11.5.10, time stamps will be stored for new PO receipts. For data that was created before the upgrade, the time stamp will be 00:00:00. As a result of this change, queries written for the views for Oracle Purchasing may not return rows for transactions that happened after the upgrade unless these time stamps are taken into account. Therefore, the queries should be modified. Solutions to this issue include truncating dates, using the TO_DATE function, and considering the 24-hour periods of dates. [16752] Columns return incorrect information in views for Projects. In the views for Oracle Projects, the columns whose labels end with “To_Date” presently return incorrect values because future transactions are also taken into account. This known issue will be fixed in a future release. [19926] CRP_Department_Resource_Hours returns incorrect data. The Department_Resource_Hours column of the view returns zero when the shift number is not equal to 1. This issue will be fixed in a future release. [19947] Item category key flexfield columns may return data for irrelevant segments. For the standard and XOP forms of the following views, the respective columns for the Item Categories key flexfield may return information for segments pertaining to irrelevant structures: • EAM_Asset_Information: Asset_Cat$ • EAM_WO_Matrl_Requirements: PO_Cat$, Purch_Cat$, and Req_Cat$ • EAM_Work_Requests: Asset_Cat$ • GMF_Overhead_Percentages: Cost_Cat$, GL_Cat$, Item_GL$, and Line_Cat$ • HR_PO_Buyers: Item_Category$ Noetix Corporation 9 support.noetix.com
Page 1 and 2: Release Notes NoetixViews ® 6.0.1
Page 3 and 4: WHAT’S NEW The additions and impr
Page 5 and 6: Back up your environment before pro
Page 7: Columns in Payroll views do not ret
Page 11 and 12: View generation may take long time
Page 13 and 14: i_create_sm_users.sql sets correct
Page 15 and 16: NoetixViews for Oracle Bill of Mate
Page 17 and 18: NoetixViews for Oracle Inventory Th
Page 19 and 20: NoetixViews for Oracle Purchasing T
Page 21 and 22: Z$ columns removed from some views.
Page 23 and 24: • BOM_Implemented_Bills • BOM_I
Page 25 and 26: NoetixViews for Oracle Order Manage
Page 27 and 28: • PB_Customers • PB_Draft_Invoi
Page 29 and 30: Ledger name, set of books name para
Page 31 and 32: NoetixAnswers for Oracle Enterprise
Page 33 and 34: • MRP_Orders: o How many orders a
Page 35 and 36: NoetixAnswers for Oracle Payables T
Page 37 and 38: NoetixAnswers for Oracle Purchasing
Page 39 and 40: Set_Of_Books_Name column, set of bo

NoetixViews for Oracle Payables - Noetix Technical Support

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?