21.01.2015 Views

Staff Reports - East Bay Municipal Utility District

Staff Reports - East Bay Municipal Utility District

Staff Reports - East Bay Municipal Utility District

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sacramento <strong>Municipal</strong> <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>District</strong> Facilities Charge Agreement<br />

March 12, 2013<br />

Page 2<br />

<strong>District</strong> staff met with SMUD to seek an amicable resolution to the Clay Station Pumping Plant energy<br />

services charges. <strong>District</strong> staff proposed that SMUD bill based on the 5.0 MW of needed capacity instead<br />

of the installed capacity of 10.5 MW. SMUD agreed to the <strong>District</strong>'s proposal contingent on EBMUD<br />

agreeing to pay for the installation of load limiting equipment at the Clay Station Pumping Plant to ensure<br />

that the <strong>District</strong> would not use in excess of 5.0 MW.<br />

Both parties have agreed that this agreement is a complete resolution of any and all claims arising from<br />

the dispute and that further claims will not be raised. Furthermore, the <strong>District</strong> agrees to indemnity,<br />

defend, and hold harmless, SMUD, its directors, officers, agents, and employees against all claims,<br />

expenses, and liabilities asserted against SMUD by any third party arising from or related to the billing<br />

issues or the terms of the agreement, including any damage caused or related to an event where electricity<br />

demand exceeds the <strong>District</strong> contract installed capacity value.<br />

FISCAL IMPACT<br />

With the implementation of this agreement, the <strong>District</strong> will owe SMUD $219,716 in retroactive charges<br />

for the billing period from March 2010 to February 1, 2012 instead of $439,433. In addition, SMUD<br />

agreed to base future billings on the 5.0 MW of needed capacity, which will save the <strong>District</strong> about<br />

$180,000 per year. Funds for the retroactive and the monthly energy services charges are included in the<br />

FY13 budget.<br />

ALTERNATIVE<br />

Do not execute this agreement. This is not recommended, because the negotiated agreement represents a<br />

fair resolution of EBMUD and SMUD interests and a significant cost savings to the <strong>District</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!