COST Action 873 Training School Agrobacterium ... - Cost 873

COST Action 873 Training School Agrobacterium ... - Cost 873 COST Action 873 Training School Agrobacterium ... - Cost 873

21.01.2015 Views

COST Action 873 Training School Agrobacterium classical and molecular phytobacteriology 5 - 9 September 2011 University of Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France Focus: Classical, molecular, genomic and phytosanitary aspects of Agrobacterium related to stone fruit and nut health. Topics: - Detection, isolation and identification - Phenotypic macroarrays and biochemical tests - Pathogenicity tests - Plasmid profiles COST 873 - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 1

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>Action</strong> <strong>873</strong> <strong>Training</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

<strong>Agrobacterium</strong> classical and molecular<br />

phytobacteriology<br />

5 - 9 September 2011<br />

University of Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France<br />

Focus:<br />

Classical, molecular, genomic and phytosanitary aspects of <strong>Agrobacterium</strong> related to<br />

stone fruit<br />

and nut health.<br />

Topics:<br />

- Detection, isolation and identification<br />

- Phenotypic macroarrays and biochemical tests<br />

- Pathogenicity tests<br />

- Plasmid profiles<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 1


Place:<br />

Université Lyon 1, Microbial Ecology UMR 5557 / USC INRA 1193, Villeurbanne,<br />

France<br />

http://www.univ-lyon1.fr/ http://www.ecologiemicrobiennelyon.fr/<br />

<strong>Training</strong> course will take place Building Darwin A - room M3<br />

10, rue Rafael Dubois - 69100 Villeurbanne Cedex - France<br />

Local organizer:<br />

Dr. Céline Lavire, Université Lyon 1, Microbial Ecology UMR CNRS 5557 / USC<br />

INRA 1193,<br />

Bâtiment Forel, 43 boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, 69100 Villeurbanne Cedex –<br />

France<br />

celine.lavire@univ-lyon.fr Tel: +33 (0)4 26 24 82 05 Fax: +33 (0)4 72 43 12 23<br />

Scientific general organiser:<br />

Dr. Xavier Nesme, Université Lyon 1, Microbial Ecology UMR CNRS 5557 / USC<br />

INRA 1193,<br />

Bâtiment Mendel, 43 boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, 69100 Villeurbanne Cedex –<br />

France<br />

nesme@univ-lyon1.fr Tel: +33 (0)4 72 44 82 89 Fax: +33 (0)4 72 43 12 23<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> chair:<br />

Dr. Brion Duffy, Federal Department of Economic Affairs FDEA, Agroscope Changins-<br />

Wädenswil<br />

ACW, Schloss 1 Postfach, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland<br />

duffy@acw.admin.ch Tel. +41 44 783 64 16 Fax +41 44 783 63 05<br />

Dr. Joël F. Pothier, Federal Department of Economic Affairs FDEA, Agroscope<br />

Changins-<br />

Wädenswil ACW, Schloss 1 Postfach, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland<br />

joel.pothier@acw.admin.ch Tel. +41 44 783 61 14 Fax +41 44 783 63 05<br />

Trainers:<br />

Dr. Xavier Nesme, Université Lyon 1, Microbial Ecology UMR CNRS 5557 / USC<br />

INRA 1193,<br />

Villeurbanne, France<br />

Pr. María M. López, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Moncada, Spain<br />

Dr. Joanna Pulawska, Research Institute of Horticulture, Skierniewice, Poland<br />

Dr. Daniel Muller, Université Lyon 1, Microbial Ecology UMR CNRS 5557 / USC INRA<br />

1193,<br />

Villeurbanne, France<br />

Mrs. Laurence Loiseau, Université Lyon 1, PAR-MIC, Villeurbanne, France<br />

Mr. Tony Campillo, Université Lyon 1, Microbial Ecology UMR CNRS 5557 / USC<br />

INRA 1193,<br />

Villeurbanne, France<br />

Mr. Malek Shams Université Lyon 1, Microbial Ecology UMR CNRS 5557 / USC<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 2


INRA 1193,<br />

Villeurbanne, France<br />

Mr. Florent Lassale Université Lyon 1, Microbial Ecology UMR CNRS 5557 / USC<br />

INRA 1193,<br />

Villeurbanne, France<br />

Mr. David Chapulliot Université Lyon 1, Microbial Ecology UMR CNRS 5557 / USC<br />

INRA 1193,<br />

Villeurbanne, France<br />

Dr. Céline Lavire, Université Lyon 1, Microbial Ecology UMR CNRS 5557 / USC<br />

INRA 1193,<br />

Villeurbanne, France (local organiser)<br />

Dr. Joël F. Pothier, Agroscope Changins-Wädenswil Research station, Wädenswil,<br />

Switzerland<br />

(<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> chair representative)<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 3


What is so uncommon with <strong>Agrobacterium</strong> that is<br />

necessary you remember before you undertake crown gall studies.<br />

1- <strong>Agrobacterium</strong> tumefaciens is not the causative agent of crown gall: Ti plasmids<br />

are the true crown gall causative agents <strong>Agrobacterium</strong> are only Ti plasmid<br />

vectors<br />

2- <strong>Agrobacterium</strong> tumefaciens does not necessarily induce crown gall, nor Rhizobium<br />

rhizogenes hairy root: because these are taxon names and no longer indicator of<br />

pathogenicity traits.<br />

3- More than one strain of <strong>Agrobacterium</strong> are generally involved in a crown gall<br />

outbreak: more than one isolate is necessary to have an idea of pathogenic<br />

population involved.<br />

1.00<br />

0.05<br />

1.00<br />

1.00<br />

0.95<br />

0.97<br />

0.95<br />

R. rhizogenes<br />

R. tropici<br />

0.98<br />

B. japoponicum<br />

Rh. palustris<br />

Az. caulinodans<br />

M. loti<br />

E. medicae<br />

E. meliloti<br />

R. etli<br />

R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii<br />

R. phaseoli<br />

1.00<br />

G7<br />

G3<br />

A. undicola<br />

A. larrymoorei<br />

NCPPB 1650<br />

A. rubi<br />

G1<br />

G5<br />

G13<br />

G4 = A. radiobacter<br />

G2<br />

G9<br />

G6<br />

G8 = A. fabrum<br />

A. vitis<br />

Fig.1 Revised nomenclature for <strong>Agrobacterium</strong> as proposed by the<br />

subcommittee of taxonomy for Rhizobium and <strong>Agrobacterium</strong><br />

recA phylogeny constructed using Maximum-Likelyhood with PhyML ln(L) = -9626.2,<br />

1501 sites, GTR, 4 rate classes. A., <strong>Agrobacterium</strong>; R., Rhizobium; E., Ensifer; M.,<br />

Mesorhizobium; Az., Azorhizobium; Rh. Rhodopseudomonas; B., Bradyrhizobium.<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 4


Procedure for <strong>Agrobacterium</strong> isolation and identification<br />

NB. Populations of <strong>Agrobacterium</strong> in soils, rhizospheres and even tumors are always<br />

heterogenous. Thus, extreme cares must be taken during the isolation procedure<br />

because a single colony may often consisted of different strains. Performing three<br />

time the isolation stepsdescribed below. A phase of hydration of several hours in<br />

water to allow efficient cell separations from mucous polysaccharides is imperative.<br />

Experiment 1<br />

<strong>Agrobacterium</strong> isolation from: soil, maize rhizosphere and crown gall.<br />

Soil: weigh 0.5 g in sterile 1.5 ml microtube. Add 500 µl sterile water, vortex. Pipet<br />

100 µl and isolate using bead on agar media (1A-Te,2E-Te and MG-Te).<br />

Rhizosphere: gently wash plant in sterile distilled water, weigh 0.5 g of root in sterile<br />

1.5 ml microtube. Add 500 µl sterile water, vortex. Crush roots. Streak 25 µl of<br />

crushed root on 1A-Te, 2E-Te and MG-Te agar plates (2 plates per selective media).<br />

Crown gall: gently wash plant in sterile distilled water, weigh 0.5 g of root in sterile<br />

1.5 ml microtube. Add 500 µl sterile water, vortex. Crush roots. Streak 25 µl of<br />

crushed tumor on 1A-Te,2E-Te and MG-Te agar plates (2 plates per selective<br />

medium).<br />

Incubate 4/5 days at 28°C.<br />

Experiment 2<br />

Day 1: Select four <strong>Agrobacterium</strong> like colonies and transfer them in microplate wells<br />

containing 200 µl of sterile water. Incubate overnight at 28°C (for diet and efficient<br />

bacterium cell separation).<br />

Day 2: From microplates streak each selected bacteria onto 1A, 2E, MG and LPG<br />

plates (4 bacteria per 1 plate).<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 5


Day 4: For colonies grown on LPG or MG agar plates, do colonies PCR experiments<br />

(See colony PCR section).<br />

Experiment 3<br />

Source: Pure cultures grown in separate colonies on 1A-Te, 2E-Te, MG-Te, and MG,<br />

1A, 2E and LPG.<br />

Select 2 strains (1 per trainee) for further characterization and identification<br />

Day 1<br />

Observation of colony morphology of selected strains on each medium.<br />

Transfer 6 isolated colonies from LPG (or MG if necessary) into sterile capped tube<br />

containing 4 ml of NaCl 0.8% incubate overnight at 28°C (see phenotypic microarray<br />

section).<br />

Transfer 1 colony into 200 µl of sterile water (microplate wells or 1.5 ml microtube).<br />

Use it to perform biochemical tests (see biochemical tests section).<br />

Day 2<br />

Streak each selected bacteria onto MG and LPG plates.<br />

For phenotypic macroarrays experiments prepare PM1 and PM2 plates. See<br />

phenotypic macroarray section.<br />

Day 4<br />

For colonies grown on LPG or MG agar plates, do colonies PCR experiments (See<br />

colony PCR section).<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 6


Standard culture medium<br />

LPG<br />

Yeast extract 5 g<br />

Peptone<br />

10 g<br />

D-Glucose 10 g<br />

Agar<br />

15 g<br />

Adjust volume to 1 L with H2O<br />

Adjust to pH 7.2<br />

Selective media<br />

Selective media of Brisbanne and Kerr were modified by Mougel et al. to improve<br />

their selectivity in particularily difficult environments such as soils or necrosed<br />

tumors.<br />

A stock solution (100 mg ml<br />

1 ) of K 2 TeO 3 was prepared in ultra-pure water and<br />

sterilized by filtration (NB: potassium tellurite doses differ according to biovar)<br />

- 1A and 1A-Te (for biovar 1 [i.e. A. tumefaciens complex))<br />

L-Arabitol<br />

3.04 g<br />

NH 4 NO 3<br />

0.16 g<br />

KH 2 PO 4<br />

0.54 g<br />

K 2 HPO 4<br />

1.04 g<br />

MgSO 4 ,7H 2 0<br />

0.25 g<br />

Taurocholic acid sodium salt hydrate 0.29 g<br />

Crystal violet (stock solution 1 %) 200 µl<br />

Agar<br />

15 g<br />

Adjust volume to 1 L with H2O<br />

Sterilize by autoclaving (20 minutes at 120° C)<br />

For 1A-Te, after autoclaving add:<br />

Tellurite of potassium (K 2 TeO 3 ) 80 µg. ml -1<br />

- 2E and 2E-Te (for biovar 2 [i.e. Rhizobium rhizogenes]):<br />

Erythritol<br />

3.05 g<br />

NH 4 NO 3<br />

0.16 g<br />

KH 2 PO 4<br />

0.54 g<br />

K 2 HPO 4<br />

1.04 g<br />

MgSO 4 ,7H 2 0<br />

0.25 g<br />

Taurocholic acid sodium salt hydrate 0.29 g<br />

Yeast extract<br />

0.01 g<br />

Malachite green (stock solution 1 %) 200 µl<br />

Agar<br />

15 g<br />

Adjust volume to 1 L with H2O<br />

Sterilize by autoclaving (20 minutes at 120° C)<br />

For 2E-Te, after autoclaving add:<br />

Tellurite of potassium 320 µg. ml -1<br />

-MG and MG-Te<br />

D-Mannitol<br />

L-glutamic acid<br />

5 g<br />

2 g<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 7


KH 2 PO 4<br />

NaCl<br />

MgSO 4 ,7H 2 0<br />

Yeast extract<br />

Agar<br />

Adjust volume to 1 L with H2O<br />

Adjust to pH 7.2<br />

0.5 g<br />

0.2 g<br />

0.2 g<br />

0.5 g<br />

15g<br />

Sterilize by autoclaving (20 minutes at 120° C)<br />

For MG-Te, after autoclaving add:<br />

Tellurite of potassium 200 µg. ml -1<br />

Reference:<br />

For 1A-Te and 2A-Te:<br />

- Brisbane, P. G., and A. Kerr (1983) Selective media for the three biovars of <strong>Agrobacterium</strong>. J. Appl.<br />

Bacteriol. 54:425–431.<br />

- C. Mougel, B. Cournoyer and X. Nesme (2001) Novel Tellurite Amended media and specific<br />

chromosomal and Ti plasmid probes for direct analysis of soil populations of <strong>Agrobacterium</strong> Biovars 1<br />

and 2. Applied and environmental Microbiology, volume 67, issue 1, pages 65-74.<br />

For MG media:<br />

- Keane, P. J., A. Kerr, and P. B. New (1970) Crown gall of stone fruit. II. Identification and<br />

nomenclature of <strong>Agrobacterium</strong> isolates.Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 23:585-595<br />

Fig. 2. Plating of a 10 -1 dilution suspension of soil on 1A medium (a) or 1A<br />

medium amended with 60 ppm of K 2 TeO 3 (b). (c) Enlarged (magnification, 30 x)<br />

typical black colonies of A. tumefaciens on the amended medium. Some<br />

agrobacterial colonies are indicated by arrows (Mougel et al. 2001).<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 8


Phenotypic macroarrays (Omnilog®) and biochemical<br />

tests (presumptive identification of <strong>Agrobacterium</strong><br />

members)<br />

PROCEDURE for PM 1 – 2 Inoculation<br />

Cell Suspension Preparation and PM Inoculation<br />

Monday<br />

Preparation of Cells :<br />

1. From pure strains isolated on agar plates and incubated 48h at 28°C.<br />

2. Transfer isolated colonies into sterile capped tube containing 4 ml of NaCl<br />

0.8%. Stir gently cell suspension with the swab and incubate overnight at<br />

28°C.<br />

Tuesday<br />

3. Centrifuge , rinse and resuspend cell pellet in 2 ml of IF0a<br />

Preparation of PM Inoculating Fluids<br />

1. Pipet 10 ml of this IF-0 into a 20 x 150 mm sterile capped test tube.<br />

2. Pipet 16 ml of 1.2x IF-0 into a 120 ml sterile plastic vial.<br />

+ dye mixA 0.240ml<br />

+ sterile water 3.76ml<br />

Inoculation of PM Panels (see procedure in Fig A)<br />

Step 1: Prepare Cell Suspensions<br />

1. Transfer into the sterile capped tube containing 10 ml IFOa 1.2X<br />

Check the turbidity of this IF0a to achieve 100% T (transmittance) in the Biolog<br />

Turbidimeter.<br />

2. Add the cell suspension to achieve 42% T to the tube containing 10 ml of IF0a<br />

3. Transfer 4 ml of the 42%T cell suspension prepare in point 2 into the sterile<br />

pre-filled vial containing 20 ml of IF-0+dye +water.<br />

Mix completely but gently. DO NOT create air bubbles in the cell<br />

suspension.<br />

The final cell density is 85% T.<br />

Step 2: Inoculate PM 1 – 2<br />

4. Transfer this cell suspension into a sterile reservoir.<br />

5. Inoculate PM 1 – 2 with this cell suspension, 100 µl / well.<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 9


Standard biochemical tests<br />

Agrobacteria and especially A. tumefaciens / biovar 1 have esculinase and fast<br />

acting urease. Positive response to esculine and urease tests add to a Gram<br />

negative coloration (using rapid test with just prepared KOH solution insteed) and<br />

colony morphology in agar plates tests are strongly indicating the presence of<br />

agrobacteria. Together with the ability to produce 3-keto-lactose indicated by an<br />

intense yellow precipitate, these tests sign the presence of A. tumefaciens / biovar 1.<br />

Esculine<br />

- peptone 10g<br />

- Esculine 1 g<br />

- ferric ammonium citrate 20 g<br />

- distilled water (qsp) 1 L<br />

Urease<br />

- L-tryptophane 3 g<br />

- Urée 20 g<br />

- KH 2 PO 4 1 g<br />

- KH 2 PO 4 1 g<br />

- NaCl 5 g<br />

- Ethanol 95 % 10 ml<br />

- Phenol red 25 mg<br />

- distilled water (qsp) 1 L<br />

3-keto-lactose<br />

Streak bacteria on plates containing lactose medium, grow for 48h then pour<br />

Benedict's reagent onto plate.<br />

Lactose medium<br />

- Lactose 10 g<br />

- Yest extract 1 g<br />

- Agar 15 g<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 10


Distilled water (qsp) 1 L<br />

Benedict's reagent<br />

Solution A<br />

- sodium citrate 173 g<br />

- Na 2 CO 3 100 g<br />

- Distilled water (qsp) 850 ml<br />

Solution B<br />

- CuSO 4 18 g<br />

- Distilled water (qsp) 150 ml<br />

Gently add solution B to solution A.<br />

Fig. 3. Positive and negative reactions to the 3-keto-lactose test of Bernaert &<br />

De Ley of various A. tumefaciens complex and R. rhizogenes members.<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 11


<strong>Agrobacterium</strong> and Ti plasmid direct detection from<br />

complex environments : metagenomic DNA extraction<br />

and molecular detection<br />

1- Metagenomic DNA Extraction using Mobio Powersoil DNA<br />

isolation kit.<br />

NB. Tumor samples have to be dissected into small pieces with a sterile scalpel and<br />

crushed into a 1.5 ml microtube with a sterile micropestle before extraction.<br />

0.5 g tumor, 0.5 g soil, 0.5 g rhizosphere directly into Mobio tubes.<br />

1. To the PowerBead Tubes provided, 0.5 grams of soil sample or crown gall or<br />

rhizospheric soil (root plus adherent soil).<br />

2. Gently vortex to mix.<br />

3. Check Solution C1. If Solution C1 is precipitated, heat solution to 60°C until<br />

dissolved before use.<br />

4. Add 60 µl of Solution C1 and invert several times or vortex briefly.<br />

5. Secure PowerBead Tubes horizontally using the MO BIO Vortex Adapter tube<br />

holder for the vortex. Vortex at maximum speed for 10 minutes.<br />

6. Centrifuge tubes at 10,000 x g for 30 seconds at room temperature.<br />

7. Transfer the supernatant to a clean 2 ml Collection Tube (provided).<br />

Note: Expect between 400 to 500 µl of supernatant. Supernatant may still contain<br />

some soil particles.<br />

8. Add 250 µl of Solution C2 and vortex for 5 seconds. Incubate at 4°C for 5<br />

minutes.<br />

9. Centrifuge the tubes at room temperature for 1 minute at 10,000 x g.<br />

10. Avoiding the pellet, transfer up to, but no more than, 600 µl of supernatant to a<br />

clean 2 ml Collection Tube (provided).<br />

11. Add 200 µl of Solution C3 and vortex briefly. Incubate at 4°C for 5 minutes.<br />

12. Centrifuge the tubes at room temperature for 1 minute at 10,000 x g.<br />

13. Avoiding the pellet, transfer up to, but no more than, 750 µl of supernatant into a<br />

clean 2 ml Collection Tube (provided).<br />

14. Shake to mix Solution C4 before use. Add 1200 µl of Solution C4 to the<br />

supernatant and vortex for 5 seconds.<br />

15. Load approximately 675 µl onto a Spin Filter and centrifuge at 10,000 x g for 1<br />

minute at room temperature. Discard the flow through and add an additional 675 µl of<br />

supernatant to the Spin Filter and centrifuge at 10,000 x g for 1 minute at room<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 12


temperature. Load the remaining supernatant onto the Spin Filter and centrifuge at<br />

10,000 x g for 1 minute at room temperature.<br />

NB: A total of three loads for each processed sample are required.<br />

16. Add 500 µl of Solution C5 and centrifuge at room temperature for 30 seconds at<br />

10,000 x g.<br />

17. Discard the flow through.<br />

18. Centrifuge again at room temperature for 1 minute at 10,000 x g.<br />

19. Carefully place spin filter in a clean 2 ml Collection Tube (provided). Avoid<br />

splashing any Solution C5 onto the Spin Filter.<br />

20. Add 100 µl of sterile H 2 0 to the center of the white filter membrane.<br />

21. Centrifuge at room temperature for 30 seconds at 10,000 x g.<br />

22. Discard the Spin Filter. The DNA in the tube is now ready for any downstream<br />

application. No further steps are required.<br />

2- PCR detection of <strong>Agrobacterium</strong> and Ti plasmid in metagenomic<br />

DNA<br />

Primer Target size (bp) Annealing temp.<br />

F809-PA 16s 1477 60<br />

F810-PH<br />

F8360 A. tumefaciens generalist (pyr) 453 52<br />

F8361<br />

F8533 A. radiobacter / A.tumefaciens G4 511 60<br />

F8827<br />

F6786 A. fabrum / A.tumefaciens G8 502 60<br />

F6784<br />

F7386 Rhizobiaceae generalist TRL 779 52<br />

F7387<br />

VCF3 (F8521) Ti plasmid 414 54<br />

VCR3 (F8521)<br />

FGP tmr530 FGP tmr701! FGP nos 1236!<br />

tmr<br />

ons<br />

6b<br />

nos<br />

T-DNA<br />

172bp<br />

3600bp<br />

256bp<br />

FGP virA2275 FGP virB 2164!<br />

Vir<br />

vir A<br />

vir B2<br />

1673bp<br />

FGPS6 FGPS1509! FGPL132!<br />

rrs<br />

IGS<br />

rrl<br />

1479bp<br />

2500-2700bp<br />

500bp<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 13


PCR are performed in a 30 µl reaction mixture containing (n+1 reactions):<br />

Components<br />

Volume<br />

10 X PCR buffer 3 µl<br />

DMSO 1.2 µl<br />

2 mM dNTP mixture 2 µl<br />

50 mM MgCl2 0.4 µl<br />

10 µM Primer forward 1.2 µl<br />

10 µM Primer reverse 1.2 µl<br />

Taq DNA polymerase 0.1 µl or 0.2 µl<br />

Distilled water (qsp) 28.5 µl for metagenomic extraction or 30 µl for PCR colony test.<br />

For n reactions, prepare a mix for n+1 reactions in a 1.5 ml microtube.<br />

Aliquot 28.5 µl for metagenomic extraction or 30 µl for PCR colony<br />

Add template DNA (metagenomic extraction) 1.5 µl<br />

Or for PCR colony: add a small amount of colony from agar plates (inoculated<br />

Monday).<br />

NB. Use a tooth pick: the amount of cells must be very small. Just a touch will do!!<br />

A negative control and positive control are included for each PCR assay.<br />

PCR cycling:<br />

-95°C for 5 min<br />

-Perform 30 cycles of PCR amplification:<br />

Denature 95°C for 45 s<br />

Anneal (see temperature table 1) for 45s<br />

Extend 72°C for 1 min<br />

-Final extend 72°C for 1 min<br />

Amplification products are analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis (1% in T.B.E<br />

buffer).<br />

Before loading the samples mix loading dye ( X 10 µl) with 10 µl of the PCR product<br />

Don’t forget appropriate molecular weight standards (5 µl of 1 Kb Plus DNA ladder).<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 14


Pathogenicity<br />

Virulence assays (pathogenicity test) are conducted by wounding stems of 3-weekold<br />

tomato plant (or 4-week-old tomato) with a scalpel (incision between 4 cm and 6<br />

cm in length) then inoculating a dense suspension of 48-h-old cultures in sterile<br />

water.<br />

Tumors are visible 3 weeks postinoculation.<br />

Fig. 3. Symptoms of crown gall disease on<br />

rose plants. Galls developed frequently on<br />

rootstocks (A, B, and C) and roots (D and E)<br />

but rarely on scions (F) (Pionnat et al., 1999).<br />

Fig. 4. Tumor formation induced by pathogenic <strong>Agrobacterium</strong> on tomato.<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 15


Plasmid status of <strong>Agrobacterium</strong> isolates<br />

The back trap method is modified by Wheatcroft et al (2) from the original protocol<br />

Eckhardt (1) originally based on gentle lysis of bacteria in the wells of a gel.<br />

Materials<br />

Sterile tubes (5 ml) with 2 ml of medium, 1,5 ml eppendorf tubes<br />

* 11 x 14 cm gel (BRL tank) or equivalent<br />

* 20 well comb, 2 mm thick teeth<br />

Solutions<br />

Na N-lauroyl sarcosinate 0,3% (4°C)<br />

Na N-lauroyl sarcosinate 30 mg<br />

H2Oup up to 10 ml<br />

Tris 10 mM, EDTA 10 mM<br />

Tris base 10 mM<br />

0,605 g<br />

EDTA 10 mM<br />

1,861 g<br />

H2O up to 500 ml<br />

Solution F: Tris 10 mM, EDTA 10 mM, 20% Ficoll (400,000) (store at -20°C)<br />

Ficoll (400,000)<br />

10 g<br />

Tris 10 mM, EDTA 10 mM up to 50 ml<br />

Solution S : SDS 10%, xylene cyanole (1 mg/ml) (store at -20°C)<br />

Lauryl sulfate<br />

10 g<br />

Xylene cyanole FF 0,1 g<br />

H2Oup up to 100 ml<br />

Lysozyme (10 mg/ml)<br />

lysozyme<br />

H2Oup<br />

10 mg<br />

1 ml<br />

Solution L : Tris 10 mM, EDTA 10 mM, RNase type A (0,4 mg/ml),<br />

bromophenol red (1 mg/ml) (store at -20°C)<br />

Tris 10 mM, EDTA 10 mM 10 ml<br />

RNase A (0,4 mg/ml) 10 µl RNase A (800 mg/2ml)<br />

bromophenol red (1 mg/ml) 0,01 g<br />

Methods<br />

Bacterial cell culture<br />

- Bacterial cells are grown at 28°C in 2 ml liquid medium<br />

Gel stacking<br />

- Prepare a 0.75% agarose gel in 1 x TBE ( 0.60 g agarose /80 ml TBE1x). Prepare<br />

the gel 1 h before deposits<br />

- Put the electrophoresis tank in an ice bath.<br />

- Place gel in 1 x TBE: buffer flush with the surface of the gel without covering it<br />

(buffer should not enter in the wells)<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 16


Preparation of bacterial lysates<br />

- Measure the OD 600 nm of each culture tube.<br />

- Make dilutions with 0.9% NaCl so as to have 1 ml at OD 600 nm of 0.2.<br />

- Centrifuge (13,000 g, 3 min, 4 ° C).<br />

From this stage, work on ice<br />

- Resuspend the pellet in 500µl H 2 O (4°C), Vortex<br />

- gently place the suspension in 1 ml Na N-lauroyl sarcosinate<br />

0.3% (4 ° C).<br />

The bacterial suspension migrates in the sarcosyl. quickly go to<br />

the next step to avoid lysis insarcosyl.<br />

- Centrifuge (13,000 g, 3 min, 4 °C).<br />

- Promptly remove the supernatant.<br />

- Dry traces of supernatant.<br />

- Resuspend the pellet in 40 µl solution F (stored at -20 °C).Vortex 10 sec, put tubes<br />

15 min on ice (after 5 to 10 minutes, vortex again a few seconds to fully resuspend).<br />

It is possible to leave tubes on ice over15 minutes.<br />

- During those 15 minutes, deposited 25 µl solution S in the wells of the gel. Run 10<br />

to 15 minutes at 100 V (reverse polarity) until the migration line is one cm in front of<br />

the wells.<br />

- Cover the gel with about 150 ml 1 x TBE (1 mm above the gel), wells must be<br />

covered.<br />

- Prepare the lysis solution: 25 µl lysozyme (10 mg / ml) to be added to an Eppendorf<br />

tube containing 230 µl solution L.<br />

- Add 10 µl of lysis solution to the bacterial suspension, mix gently (3 laps with the<br />

pipette) and deposit immediately 25 µl in a well.<br />

This is the most difficult step to get a beautiful profile: everything is done in the ice<br />

next to the electrophoresis tank thus prepare a pipetteman set to 10 µl, and another<br />

pipette set to 25 µl.<br />

- Migrate (40 V, 30 min) do not forget to change polarity, this slow migration allows<br />

SDS to return to the wells and then 100 V, 3 h or more if necessary.<br />

- Reveal by a ethidium bromide bath.<br />

Plasmid content. Plasmid profiles are determined by a modified Eckhardt agarose<br />

gel electrophoresis technique as described. Plasmid sizes are estimated by<br />

comparison with those of A. fabrum C58 (fig baktrap profil)<br />

Reference:<br />

- Eckhardt T. 1978. A rapid method for the identification of plasmid desoxyribonucleic acid in bacteria.<br />

Plasmid 1: 584-588.<br />

- Wheatcroft R., McRae D.G., and Miller R. W. 1990. Changes in the Rhizobium meliloti genome and<br />

the ability to detect supercoiled plasmids during bacteroid development. Mol. Plant Microbe<br />

Interactions. 3: 9-17.<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 17


Sequence and phylogenetic analyses<br />

This module intend to present the utilization of bioinformatic tools in a standard<br />

procedure for phylogenetic typing of isolated strains, from the elaboration of PCR<br />

primers for amplification of marker genes to the construction of phylogenetic trees<br />

replacing the unknown strain's allele into a well-defined taxonomic context.<br />

A set of diverse bioinformatic softwares and web-based resources are used in<br />

this training session. Web links for resources or downloading of installation files are<br />

listed in annex.<br />

I. Definition of oligonucleotidic primers for PCR<br />

For amplification of a marker gene from an unknown <strong>Agrobacterium</strong> strain, we need<br />

to define generalist primers able to hybridize with any allele of the gene. For this<br />

purpose, the primers must be nested in region highly conserved in all targeted recA<br />

alleles among agrobacteria strains.<br />

1. Determination of conserved regions from sequence alignments<br />

The marker gene used for routine typing of agrobacteria is the gene recA. This gene<br />

has been sequenced in all known representatives of the taxon and its allele diversity<br />

is well known. This diversity is summarized in the sequence bank file in FASTA<br />

format recA_allAgro.fas. Open this file with the software Seaview (see annex). The<br />

sequences are named according to the species and the allele type of the strain (for<br />

example, « recA-G9-2 » stands for allele type 2 of genomovar G9 of A. tumefaciens).<br />

Also, sequences are already aligned, allowing us to search for putative conserved<br />

regions. The recA gene has been chosen as a marker because it codes the<br />

recombinase A, a housekeeping protein under strong purifying selection that should<br />

display good conservation among the taxon. Search the alignment for such<br />

conserved region.<br />

2. Definition of primers candidate regions<br />

To have a specific hybridization, a PCR primer must be at least 18 nt-long. One must<br />

then identify regions of that size where each site is invariant across all known allele<br />

types. However, such long conserved regions are quite rare, and regions with low<br />

variation might be good for primers, since they are defined taking into account the<br />

constrains due to the molecular mechanisms of PCR. Indeed, efficient amplification<br />

of the product rely mostly on the good annealing of the 3'-end of the primer to the<br />

template DNA for the Taq polymerase to elongate the DNA strand. Then, a few<br />

mismatches can be tolerated between the primer and template sequences, since<br />

they are far from the 3'-end of the primer (at least 5 or 6 nt). Pay attention that many<br />

mismatches impair the specific hybridization between the primer and its target.<br />

Consecutive mismatches must be avoided in primer design because they create a<br />

non-annealed bulge in the primer-target DNA duplex and impair their affinity<br />

properties.<br />

3. Fine-tuning of primer design<br />

When good primer regions are defined, it is recomended to optimize the primer<br />

design to make the pair of oligonucleotides compatible, especially for their melting<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 18


temperature (Tm). This can be done using Primer3 software or its web resource (see<br />

annex).<br />

NB: when ready to order the primers, do not forget that the reverse primer<br />

must have been converted to its reverse complement relatively to the sequence<br />

alignment. This can be done on diverse web resources like Sequence Editor.<br />

II. Curation of raw sequence data<br />

Once the PCR performed and the products sequenced, the sequencing company or<br />

platform is likely to return you a pair of files : the sequence file and the raw<br />

sequencing data consisting of an electrophoregram. The latter is usually in .ab1 file<br />

format, which can be opened with softwares like Sequence Scanner (Applied<br />

Biosystems, freeware). We will use this program on the file electrophoregram.ab1.<br />

1. Reading and editing the electrophoregram<br />

The 5'-end of the electrophoregram is otfen of low quality, leading to undetermined<br />

bases (N) in the deduced sequence. It is however easy to infer visually some of the<br />

actual bases from the electrophoregram. In the Sequence Scanner interface, you<br />

can simply edit the nucleotidic sequence, and then export it to a new FASTA file.<br />

NB: the file can be accompagnied by a Quality Control file. This file contain<br />

expert information from the company/platform that may be useful, notably<br />

concerning the detection of unpure PCR products.<br />

III. Identification of the sequence with BLAST<br />

BLAST is an algorithm used to align rapidly a sequence against a (large) database of<br />

sequence, and rank all the possible alignments given their length and quality. It is an<br />

useful tool to get a raw idea of the taxonomic provenance of a sequence by finding its<br />

most similar known homologs. However, there is none elaborated evolutionary model<br />

underlying a BLAST search, and it is therefore not recommended to use its results for<br />

taxonomic assignation.<br />

BLAST is available as a web service on the websites of the NCBI and EBI (see<br />

annex). We will use this program to identify an unknown agrobacterial recA sequence<br />

stored in the file unknown_sequence.fas.<br />

1. blastn search against recA “gold standard” database<br />

On the NCBI BLAST website, choose the blastn algorithm (for nucleotides). On the<br />

blastn page, check the “Align two or more sequences” option. In the Query (upper)<br />

box, paste or upload the sequence to identify. In the Subject (lower) box, paste or<br />

upload the recA_allAgro.fas file. Run BLAST, and browse results.<br />

2. blastn search against universal nucleotidic databases<br />

The large and constantly maintained databases that contain all known sequences (nr<br />

at NCBI (non-redundant part of GenBank); EMBL at EBI) can be searched as well to<br />

see if new sequences closer to our unknown sequence may have been added<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 19


ecently. On the NCBI BLAST website, proceed as previously, but uncheck the “Align<br />

two or more sequences” option. Chose instead the nr database and run BLAST.<br />

NB : from the result page, you can download the homologous sequence hits in<br />

FASTA format. This can be useful to build a sequence database for other<br />

markers and/or species, or to refresh a routinely used dataset. To do so, on the<br />

NCBI BLAST result page, go to the “Alignments” section and select the desired<br />

sequences (you shall avoid the sequences corresponding to complete genomes<br />

because the files are large and cannot be used for the further steps). Click on<br />

“Get selected sequences” to reach the corresponding GenBank page. Then, use<br />

the “Send” link (upper right corner of the page) to download the sequences in a file.<br />

IV. Alignment of homologous sequences<br />

Open the file recA_allAgro.fas with Seaview. In the “Edit” menu, choose “load<br />

sequence”, paste the unknown sequence in the box and click on “add to alignment”.<br />

Then, in the “Align” menu, select “align all” (performs alignment with MUSCLE<br />

algorithm by default, can be changed in “alignment options”). Check visually the<br />

alignment for artefacts.<br />

V. Phylogenetic tree building<br />

Seaview provides tools for phylogenetic tree construction from the alignment in its<br />

“Tree” menu.<br />

1. Distance methods<br />

The BioNJ algorithm shall be prefered to the basic NJ as it is adapted to biological<br />

purposes. Different distance models are proposed, from the simplest (Jukes &<br />

Cantor, 1969, JC) to the most prameterized (Hazegawa et al., 1985, HKY). On<br />

short alignments like the present one, calculation of BioNJ trees is very fast and allow<br />

calculation of numerous bootstrap replicates. Build the tree and interpret it for<br />

assignation of a sequence type or species to the unknown sequence.<br />

2. Model-based methods<br />

Unlees more computational time-consuming, model-based methods like PhyML<br />

perform more accurate phylogenetic history reconstruction. Many options can be<br />

specified, most of them concerning the estimation of the various parameters of the<br />

evolutionary model. As estimation of all parameters from the data is recommended<br />

rather than fixing arbitrary values, this make the calculation time grow, to a point that<br />

is not bearable by the user (or by the computer). Similarly, bootstrap replicates are<br />

very time-consuming and branch support estimation by aLRT (approximated<br />

likelihood ratio test) may be prefered. Build the tree and compare it to the previous<br />

one(s).<br />

VI. Taxonomic assignation according to results<br />

In the tree, the unknown sequence appears nested in the taxonomic group to wich it<br />

belongs. This result must be taken carefully, as its accuracy depends on the supports<br />

of the branch separating the sequence (or the group containing it) from other groups.<br />

Low support of a branch (usually under 90%) indicate the bi-partition of the tree at<br />

this point is unsure.<br />

Also, a long branch without bifurcation in the tree must be interpreted cautiously, as a<br />

common artefact in phylogeny will systematically locate a long branch nearer to the<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 20


tree basis than it should. In both cases, enhancing the species sampling is likely to<br />

resolve an uncertain tree position.<br />

This emphasize the need of good taxonomic coverage and regular sampling of the<br />

biological diversity when constituting a dataset for sequence assignation. We are<br />

proud to provide the present dataset for <strong>Agrobacterium</strong> typing, as it is the most<br />

complete and evenly sampled yet built.<br />

Fig. 5. Analysis of chromosome (ribotype) and Ti plasmid (vir) characters<br />

shows the occurrence of genetic diversity for both cell and Ti plasmid of<br />

agrobacteria involved in related crown gall outbreaks. Ponsonnet et al.<br />

(unpublished)<br />

<strong>COST</strong> <strong>873</strong> - Lyon 4-9 September 2011 21


Monday 5th Tuesday 6th Wednesday 7th Thursday 8th Friday 9th<br />

<strong>Agrobacterium</strong> isolation and<br />

Plasmid status of<br />

phenotypic macroarrays and<br />

9h00-9h45<br />

CONFERENCE Daniel Muller<br />

identification : results of<br />

<strong>Agrobacterium</strong> isolates : gel<br />

biochemical tests : results<br />

isolation and PCR analyses<br />

preparation<br />

analyses<br />

(vir/pyr/spe sp)<br />

9h45-10h00<br />

Coffee break<br />

10h00-10h15 Coffee break Coffee break Coffee break<br />

Plasmid status of<br />

Pathogenicity tests :<br />

agrobacterium isolates :<br />

10h30-11h15<br />

infection assay in<br />

compilation of data and<br />

preculture<br />

metagenomic DNA<br />

greenhouse and symptom<br />

Results analyses<br />

extraction from bulk soil,<br />

11h15-11h45<br />

visualisation.<br />

standardized procedure for<br />

rhizosphere and tumor and<br />

<strong>Agrobacterium</strong> isolation.<br />

visualisation on gel 1/2 concluding session : Xavier<br />

11h45-12h30<br />

CONF. Maria Lopez<br />

Step 3<br />

Nesme<br />

lunch lunch lunch<br />

13h30-14h30<br />

Welcome and introductive CONFERENCE Joanna<br />

metagenomic DNA<br />

CONFERENCE Xavier Nesme<br />

CONFERENCE. Xavier Nesme<br />

Pulowska<br />

extraction from bulk soil,<br />

14h30-15h15<br />

rhizosphere and tumor -<br />

phenotypic macroarrays at<br />

preparation and sterilisation<br />

Plasmid visualisation : PCR analyses ( 16S, vir and<br />

PARMIC facility and<br />

of culture media<br />

analyses of results<br />

TRL) 2/2<br />

biochemical tests. Step 2.<br />

Coffee break Coffee break Coffee break Coffee break Coffee break<br />

15h30-16h30<br />

standardized procedure for<br />

phenotypic macroarrays at<br />

<strong>Agrobacterium</strong> isolation and<br />

<strong>Agrobacterium</strong> isolation<br />

PARMIC facility and<br />

identification : analysis of<br />

from bulk soil, rhizosphere<br />

biochemical tests. Step 2.<br />

biochemical tests<br />

and tumor. Steps 1 and 2<br />

sequence manipulation and<br />

16h30-17h30 CONF. Maria Lopez phylogenetic analyses CONFERENCE Joel Pothier<br />

phenotypic macroarrays and<br />

17h30-18h00<br />

biochemical tests. Step 1.<br />

gel migration and results<br />

analyses

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!