Klaas-Jan BAKKER - AMORC
Klaas-Jan BAKKER - AMORC
Klaas-Jan BAKKER - AMORC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Divine created the basic causes from which the<br />
particulars of the world came into existence. To<br />
refer again to our analogy, eyes and ears were<br />
not arbitrarily designed to serve their function.<br />
Rather, they came out of the necessity of the living<br />
organism adjusting itself to the forces acting upon<br />
it. Consequently, from this point of view, we are<br />
It must be realised that things that are new are<br />
not necessarily better than things that are old.<br />
not static entities. There is the potentiality in of us<br />
for many changes in qualities and characteristics.<br />
Life is fluid, and it can and will adjust itself to the<br />
impact of its environment. Only as humanity tries<br />
to resist the fluidity of its nature does it remain<br />
stationary and encounter serious difficulties.<br />
Change<br />
We all know that social and environmental<br />
changes are exceedingly rapid in our times.<br />
Up to about two centuries ago our method of<br />
transportation was the same as it had<br />
been for thousands of years. This was<br />
principally horse and ox drawn carts<br />
on land and the sailing or rowing<br />
vessel on water. Also, as recently as<br />
two centuries ago, communication<br />
was substantially the same as it was<br />
during the time of the ancient Greeks<br />
and Romans. The method was mostly<br />
by private courier. Today, millions of<br />
people do not know whether to cling<br />
to what seems the stable past or to<br />
pursue lustily each new trend.<br />
It must be realised that things<br />
that are new are not necessarily better<br />
than things that are old. It is still too<br />
recent an advent to determine whether<br />
a closely knit world, a compression of<br />
peoples, is good or bad for the individual. Is a<br />
mass parcelling out of knowledge via written,<br />
televised or computerised media, beneficial or<br />
harmful We all come to know things alike by<br />
such mass methods of communication but are<br />
we getting to think too much alike Is it not true<br />
that a certain amount of isolation with one’s own<br />
thoughts is preferable Can properly stimulated<br />
individual thought spill over the boundaries<br />
which have been set by regimented education Or<br />
is individual thought too limited in contrast with<br />
Is it not true that a certain<br />
amount of isolation with one’s<br />
own thoughts is preferable<br />
the standards of the day Whether we realise it or<br />
not, there is a gradual drifting away from those<br />
factors which once shaped our thoughts.<br />
Change for the Good<br />
The new generation appears to be far less<br />
mystically, metaphysically and philosophically<br />
inclined. Values in life appear to<br />
be tied less fast to the moral and<br />
spiritual goals which were once held<br />
to be the highest ends. Today we<br />
find utilitarianism (the doctrine that<br />
the greatest happiness of the greatest number<br />
should be the guiding principle of conduct)<br />
and pragmatism (a philosophy that evaluates<br />
something solely by its practical consequences<br />
and bearing on human interests) dominating the<br />
lives of many of us.<br />
There is no tendency to establish, as<br />
philosophers and mystics have done, a broad<br />
abstract ideal as to one’s mission in life. Expediency,<br />
that which serves the moment, is the dominant<br />
factor. Most people come to view life with the<br />
attitude that “Man is here; never mind<br />
why; let him make the most of it.”<br />
Science and its attendant technology<br />
prove that this or that is the best<br />
to meet the problem of living and<br />
momentary pleasure. If uncurbed,<br />
this attitude can have a tremendously<br />
adverse influence upon the aesthetic<br />
pursuits of humanity, and upon the<br />
emotional and psychic sides of life.<br />
It undoubtedly can come to affect<br />
spiritual idealism and the search for<br />
a union with our understanding of a<br />
universal God.<br />
It is impossible, in a few words,<br />
to provide any adequate defence<br />
against this trend. The most we can<br />
do is to suggest an attitude of mind<br />
that will let one intelligently adjust to the influences<br />
of our times. It is necessary to realise that there is a<br />
difference between a cynic and a sceptic.<br />
Cynicism<br />
The cynic is a downright pessimist. He expects<br />
everything to be wrong or to be false and illusory.<br />
For the cynic, nothing is ever right; there is always<br />
some flaw to highlight The cynic is not ready to<br />
accept reality even when he actually experiences<br />
it. He is the type who thinks advertising billboards<br />
The Rosicrucian Beacon -- December 2007<br />
45