Vlerick Leuven Gent Working Paper Series 2007/03 ... - Vlerick Public

Tsui A.S., Egan T.D., O’Reilly C.A. III. (1992). Being different : relational demography and
organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly. 37(4): 549-579.
Tsui A.S., O’Reilly C.A. III. (1999). Beyond simple demographic effects : the importance of
relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal.
32(2): 402-423.
Van den Berghe L., Baelden T. (2005). The complex relation between director independence
and board effectiveness. Corporate Governance - International Journal of Business in
Society. 5(5): 58-84.
Van den Berghe L., De Ridder L. (1999). International Standardisation of Good Corporate
Governance. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Van den Berghe L., Levrau A. (2004). Evaluating boards of directors: what constitutes a good
corporate board Corporate Governance – An international Review. 12(4): 461-478.
Van den Berghe L., Levrau A. (2002). The venture capitalist as monitor of the company: a
corporate governance perspective. Corporate Governance - An International Review. 10(3):
124-135
Venkatraman N., Ramanujam V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy
research: a comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review. 11(4): 801-814.
Yermack D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors.
Journal of Financial Economics. 40(2): 185-211.
Wageman R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science
Quarterly. 40(1): 145-180.
Westphal J.D. (1998). Board games : how CEOs adapt to increases in structural board
independence from management. Administrative Science Quarterly. 43(3): 511-537.
Walsh J.P., Seward J.K. (1990). On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control
mechanisms. Academy of Management Review. 15(3): 421-458.
36