Diamond Detectors for Ionizing Radiation - HEPHY
Diamond Detectors for Ionizing Radiation - HEPHY
Diamond Detectors for Ionizing Radiation - HEPHY
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 7. RADIATION HARDNESS 46<br />
2<br />
1.8<br />
1.6<br />
1.4<br />
1.2<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
10 -4 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 1 10 10 2<br />
Figure 7.8: The d c development with photon irradiation, normalized to the initial unpumped<br />
value.<br />
normalized charge collection distance [ ]<br />
1.2<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5<br />
(24 GeV/c protons) fluence [10 15 /cm 2 ]<br />
Figure 7.9: The charge collection distance vs. proton uence, normalized to the initial pumped<br />
value.<br />
This is in qualitative agreement with the observed d c decrease.<br />
A coarse estimation suggests that diamond detectors are technically feasible as tracking<br />
detectors up to a hadronic uence of at least 10 15 particles cm ,2 , ten times more than<br />
present silicon detectors allow.<br />
As discussed with the pion irradiation (section 7.3.1), diamond samples with higher<br />
initial collection distance are more aected by radiation than those of low quality. Furthermore,<br />
this also applies to regions of higher and lower local collection distance within a<br />
single sample. Thus, the irradiation has almost no eect on the rising edge of the Landau<br />
distribution. For the potential application as a detector with a certain trigger threshold<br />
at a few thousand electrons, the eciency is less aected than suggested by the collection<br />
distance decrease.<br />
Alpha particles are known to damage solid state detectors by a factor of 100 to 1000<br />
more than minimum ionizing particles. The measured data agrees with this factor.