20.01.2015 Views

njit-etd2003-081 - New Jersey Institute of Technology

njit-etd2003-081 - New Jersey Institute of Technology

njit-etd2003-081 - New Jersey Institute of Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

70<br />

where c is a constant. Thus, the bandwidths <strong>of</strong> the analysis windows are spread<br />

logarithmically with respect to frequency, instead <strong>of</strong> linearly as with the STFT. This is<br />

illustrated in Figure 3.4.<br />

Figure 3.4 Division <strong>of</strong> the frequency domain for the STFT and the WT.<br />

What ensures is that the time resolution At becomes arbitrarily good at high<br />

frequencies, and the frequency resolution Af becomes arbitrarily good at low<br />

frequencies. For this reason, wavelet analysis is more effective than Fourier analysis<br />

when the signal <strong>of</strong> interest is dominated by transient behavior or discontinuities.<br />

Figure 3.5 displays a wavelet function ψ(t)and its dilations for different values<br />

<strong>of</strong> parameter "a" in the right column along with their short time Fourier transform<br />

equivalent counterpart in the left column. This figure helps to visualize the timefrequency<br />

plane and emphasizes the band pass nature <strong>of</strong> ψ(t) and its dilations. The<br />

STFT gives fixed resolution (for a given window size), whereas the WT gives variable<br />

resolution, which results in higher frequencies better resolved in time and lower

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!