njit-etd2003-081 - New Jersey Institute of Technology

njit-etd2003-081 - New Jersey Institute of Technology njit-etd2003-081 - New Jersey Institute of Technology

archives.njit.edu
from archives.njit.edu More from this publisher
20.01.2015 Views

233 Table 5.9 Principal Components of Different Population Groups PC1 PC2 PC3 Normal (Exercise) Normal + COPD1 RSP BP LF_PCOH_HR_BP RSP HF_COH_HR_BP HF_PCOH_HR_BP Normal + COPD2 LF _ COH _ HR _ RSP HF' _ COH _ BP _ RSP RSP Table 5.9 shows the summary of the principal component analysis for the three cases of the HRV study for both normal and COPD subjects. The data set for normal subjects during exercise shows the respiration rate was first principal component (PC); the blood pressure was the second PC and the partial coherence value between heart rate and blood pressure in the low frequency range was the third PC. When the first set of data that combined the COPD and normal data was used, only the first PC of respiration was the same and the other two PC's were different. When the second set of the combined COPD-normal data was used, the three PC's were completely different. This fact indicates that the PCA method is not "event" dependent but the technique is only adaptive to the actual data used.

234 5.7 Cluster Analysis The purpose of using principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis (CA) is illustrated by the results of figures 5.63 and 5.64 and summarized in Table 5.10. First, PCA-CA was used to blindly separate the normal subjects and COPD patients using a data set that contained the physiological data such as heart rate, blood pressure rate and respiration rate as well as the cross-spectral results of the (weighted) coherence and partial coherence in both the LF and HF range. Figure 5.63 clearly shows the separation between the COPD group (green squares and blue pluses) from the normal group (red circles). In the same figure, one red circle of a normal subject was placed near a blue plus and a green square of the COPD subject. The reason for this may be that the COPD subjects represented by blue plus and green square may only be at risk of the disease. Hence, their physiological parameters placed them near that of the normal subject. The COPD group is represented in green and blue markers because their data came from the same COPD group, but were from two different testing trials. This proves that cluster analysis could separate the normal and COPD subjects and the results were reproducible, i.e. same results for the same COPD group even with different data sets from different experimental trials. Figure 5.64 shows the results of not only normal and COPD blind separation but also the COPD severity classification. When the desired number of clusters was set prior to running the cluster analysis program to separate the normal group (cluster 1) from the "at risk" group (cluster 2), the "mild' group (cluster 3), the "moderate" group (cluster 4) and the "severe' group (cluster 5), the result was the graph of figure 5.64. This is the first attempt at this type of blind separation and classification. Another more fine-tuned

234<br />

5.7 Cluster Analysis<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> using principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis (CA) is<br />

illustrated by the results <strong>of</strong> figures 5.63 and 5.64 and summarized in Table 5.10. First,<br />

PCA-CA was used to blindly separate the normal subjects and COPD patients using a<br />

data set that contained the physiological data such as heart rate, blood pressure rate and<br />

respiration rate as well as the cross-spectral results <strong>of</strong> the (weighted) coherence and<br />

partial coherence in both the LF and HF range. Figure 5.63 clearly shows the separation<br />

between the COPD group (green squares and blue pluses) from the normal group (red<br />

circles). In the same figure, one red circle <strong>of</strong> a normal subject was placed near a blue plus<br />

and a green square <strong>of</strong> the COPD subject. The reason for this may be that the COPD<br />

subjects represented by blue plus and green square may only be at risk <strong>of</strong> the disease.<br />

Hence, their physiological parameters placed them near that <strong>of</strong> the normal subject. The<br />

COPD group is represented in green and blue markers because their data came from the<br />

same COPD group, but were from two different testing trials. This proves that cluster<br />

analysis could separate the normal and COPD subjects and the results were reproducible,<br />

i.e. same results for the same COPD group even with different data sets from different<br />

experimental trials.<br />

Figure 5.64 shows the results <strong>of</strong> not only normal and COPD blind separation but<br />

also the COPD severity classification. When the desired number <strong>of</strong> clusters was set prior<br />

to running the cluster analysis program to separate the normal group (cluster 1) from the<br />

"at risk" group (cluster 2), the "mild' group (cluster 3), the "moderate" group (cluster 4)<br />

and the "severe' group (cluster 5), the result was the graph <strong>of</strong> figure 5.64. This is the first<br />

attempt at this type <strong>of</strong> blind separation and classification. Another more fine-tuned

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!