njit-etd2003-081 - New Jersey Institute of Technology
njit-etd2003-081 - New Jersey Institute of Technology njit-etd2003-081 - New Jersey Institute of Technology
227 5.6 Principal Component Analysis As mentioned in section 3.14, the principal components were arranged in order of decreasing variance with the most informative principal component listed first, and the least informative listed last. The dimensionality of the problem was reduced, i.e., reduces the number of variables without losing much of the information. Thus instead of analyzing a large number of the original variables with complex interrelationships, the data could be analyzed by a small number of uncorrelated principal components. Figure 5.60 presented a principal component plot of the data set containing 48 COPD and 8 normal subjects at rest. The data set gave the following principal components (PC): 1 st PC: LF_coh_HR_rsp — Coherence of HR and respiration signals in the LF range (0.04 - 0.15 Hz). 2nd PC: HF _ coh _ BP _rsp — Coherence of BP and respiration signals in the HF range (0.15 - 0.4 Hz). 3 rd PC: rsp — The respiration rate. This indicated that the largest variance between COPD and normal subjects was the interrelationships between heart rate and respiration. The second largest variance was the interrelationships between blood pressure and respiration. The third largest variance was the respiration rate itself.
228 Figure 5.60 Normal and COPD classification using principal component analysis (PCA). Note: (o: Normal; +: COPD) Table 5.6 Principal Components from Normal and COPD Data P1 P2 P3 Categories 0.0351 -0.3625 0.3099 rsp 0.2960 -0.1943 0.0928 HR 0.2729 -0.2367 0.1637 BP 0.3800 0.0271 -0.0793 LF_coh HR_rsp 0.2725 -0.0886 -0.3849 LF_coh_HR_BP 0.3349 0.2178 -0.0244 LF coh BP rsp 0.3416 0.0691 -0.0556 HF_coh_HR_rsp 0.1389 0.1252 -0.5128 HF cohHRBP 0.1924 0.4961 0.0194 HF_coh BP rsp 0.3386 -0.2607 0.0482 LF_pcoh_HR_rsp 0.0449 0.0540 -0.0351 LFpcoh_HR_BP 0.3341 0.1433 0.0701 LFpcoh_BP rsp 0.2954 -0.2978 0.2039 HF_pcoh_HR_rsp -0.0170 -0.2281 -0.5558 HF_pcoh_HR_BP 0.1308 0.4691 0.2969 HF_pcoh_BP_rsp
- Page 205 and 206: 176 5.2.5 Best Wavelet Selection fo
- Page 207 and 208: 178 Table 5.1 Correlation Indices o
- Page 209 and 210: 180 5.2.6 Vagal Tone and Sympathova
- Page 211 and 212: 182 These figures basically show th
- Page 213 and 214: 184 Figure 5.20 Sympathetic and par
- Page 215 and 216: 186 Figure 5.24 Sympathetic and par
- Page 217 and 218: 188 5.2.7 Time-Frequency Analysis (
- Page 219 and 220: 190 Figure 5.29 3D and contour plot
- Page 221 and 222: 192 Figure 5.33 3D and contour plot
- Page 223 and 224: 194 Figure 5.34 Sympathetic and par
- Page 225 and 226: 196 Figure 5.38 Sympathetic and par
- Page 227 and 228: 198 Figure 5.42 Sympathetic and par
- Page 229 and 230: Figure 5.44 Plot of raw respiration
- Page 231 and 232: Figure 5.46 The LF partial coherenc
- Page 233 and 234: Figure 5.48 HF partial coherence pl
- Page 235 and 236: Table 5.2 Cross-Spectral Analysis o
- Page 237 and 238: Table 5.3 Cross-Spectral Analysis o
- Page 239 and 240: Figure 5.50 HF coherence of COPD (1
- Page 241 and 242: 212 For better presentation of the
- Page 243 and 244: Figure 5.53 Coherence and partial c
- Page 245 and 246: 216 2. Interpretation of the transf
- Page 247 and 248: 218 covariances of the parameters,
- Page 249 and 250: 220 deviations are interpreted as A
- Page 251 and 252: 222 Figure 5.58 Bode plot of the HR
- Page 253 and 254: 224 In this section a simple model
- Page 255: 226 The data for all 47 COPD subjec
- Page 259 and 260: 230 Figure 5.61 Normal and COPD cla
- Page 261 and 262: 232 Figure 5.62 Normal classificati
- Page 263 and 264: 234 5.7 Cluster Analysis The purpos
- Page 265 and 266: 236 Figure 5.64 Severity classifica
- Page 267 and 268: 238 both the normal and COPD subjec
- Page 269 and 270: 240 In summary, COPD subjects had h
- Page 271 and 272: APPENDIX A EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY A.1
- Page 273 and 274: 244 A.3 Figure Out Your Target Hear
- Page 275 and 276: APPENDIX B ANALYSIS PROGRAM LISTING
- Page 277 and 278: 248 4) Click on file, close to exit
- Page 279 and 280: 250 • TN 11
- Page 281 and 282: 252 B.1.2 Partial Coherence Between
- Page 283 and 284: 254
- Page 285 and 286: 256 Block Diagram !rime of record K
- Page 287 and 288: 258
- Page 289 and 290: 260 B.2.2 Time — Frequency Analys
- Page 291 and 292: 262 This program provides the STFT
- Page 293 and 294: 264 G(:j+1)=G(:,j+1)/(2*sum(G(:j+1)
- Page 295 and 296: 266 T=(length(Signa)/sample)/(Times
- Page 297 and 298: 268 subplot(3, 1,3), plot(T,E); xla
- Page 299 and 300: 270 4. The program creates five out
- Page 301 and 302: 272 B.2.3.4 Program to Generate Sym
- Page 303 and 304: 274 ylabel('frequency'); title('Ins
- Page 305 and 306: 276 The program will run and output
227<br />
5.6 Principal Component Analysis<br />
As mentioned in section 3.14, the principal components were arranged in order <strong>of</strong><br />
decreasing variance with the most informative principal component listed first, and the<br />
least informative listed last. The dimensionality <strong>of</strong> the problem was reduced, i.e.,<br />
reduces the number <strong>of</strong> variables without losing much <strong>of</strong> the information. Thus instead <strong>of</strong><br />
analyzing a large number <strong>of</strong> the original variables with complex interrelationships, the<br />
data could be analyzed by a small number <strong>of</strong> uncorrelated principal components.<br />
Figure 5.60 presented a principal component plot <strong>of</strong> the data set containing 48<br />
COPD and 8 normal subjects at rest. The data set gave the following principal<br />
components (PC):<br />
1 st PC: LF_coh_HR_rsp — Coherence <strong>of</strong> HR and respiration signals in the LF<br />
range (0.04 - 0.15 Hz).<br />
2nd PC: HF _ coh _ BP _rsp — Coherence <strong>of</strong> BP and respiration signals in the HF<br />
range (0.15 - 0.4 Hz).<br />
3 rd PC: rsp — The respiration rate.<br />
This indicated that the largest variance between COPD and normal subjects was<br />
the interrelationships between heart rate and respiration. The second largest variance was<br />
the interrelationships between blood pressure and respiration. The third largest variance<br />
was the respiration rate itself.