njit-etd2003-081 - New Jersey Institute of Technology

njit-etd2003-081 - New Jersey Institute of Technology njit-etd2003-081 - New Jersey Institute of Technology

archives.njit.edu
from archives.njit.edu More from this publisher
20.01.2015 Views

181 This section looks at some applications of the wavelet time frequency distribution techniques. At the same time, comparisons of different wavelets are done to find the best wavelet for the sympathovagal case. The wavelet distributions were calculated using our wavelet time frequency distribution software. The program then analyzed the representative heart rate and blood pressure RBI signals of a COPD subject. The 3D, contour plots and the activity plots were obtained for the entire file by calculating the areas under the LF, HF ranges for each instant of time. The sympathovagal balance (the ratio of the LF to the HF range, LF:HF) was also obtained. As mentioned earlier drug studies indicate that the LF range is a mixture of sympathetic and parasympathetic division activity. The ratio is an indication of both reciprocity and non-reciprocity [50]. Figures 5.18 — 5.27 display the 5-minute activity plots of a COP subject at rest breathing at 16 breaths per minute using the Morlet, Meyer, Daubechies 4, Mexican Hat and Haar wavelet. The even figures (5.18, 5.20, 5.22, 5.24 and 5.26) present the low frequency, the high frequency and the ratio of low frequency to high frequency as obtained by summing the areas under the curves in the LF and HF bands at each instant of time throughout the whole experiment period. The odd figures (5.19, 5.21, 5.23, 5.25 and 5.27) present the normalized low frequency, the normalized high frequency and the normalized ratio of the low frequency to high frequency. The normalized LF and HF activity plots are obtained by dividing at each instant of time the LF and HF power by the sum of both as follows:

182 These figures basically show that at rest, the trend of the relative power is higher in the high frequency range than in the low frequency range. In addition, the oscillation in the HF range is more than double the oscillation in the LF range. Fast oscillation in the HF range indicates that the parasympathetic activity of the COPD subject had to make faster and more regular adjustments to sustain the resting state and at the same time to compensate for the higher than normal breathing rate that contributes to more power in the HF range. The ratio of the LF to HF emphasizes the dominance of the LF activity during rest even though there is a regular compensation in the HF activity due to higher respiration rate. Figures 5.18 — 5.27 replicate the same findings using the Morlet, Meyer, dB4, Mexican Hat and Haar wavelet. The differences between these wavelets relate back to the properties of the mother wavelet. The Mexican Hat and the Haar wavelets still present the cross-term interference problem. The dB4 is the higher order Haar wavelet that improves the cross-term a little. However, the clarity of presentation and the smoothest display of Morlet wavelet have demonstrated its use as a suitable HRV timefrequency analysis method.

181<br />

This section looks at some applications <strong>of</strong> the wavelet time frequency distribution<br />

techniques. At the same time, comparisons <strong>of</strong> different wavelets are done to find the best<br />

wavelet for the sympathovagal case.<br />

The wavelet distributions were calculated using our wavelet time frequency<br />

distribution s<strong>of</strong>tware. The program then analyzed the representative heart rate and blood<br />

pressure RBI signals <strong>of</strong> a COPD subject. The 3D, contour plots and the activity plots<br />

were obtained for the entire file by calculating the areas under the LF, HF ranges for each<br />

instant <strong>of</strong> time. The sympathovagal balance (the ratio <strong>of</strong> the LF to the HF range, LF:HF)<br />

was also obtained. As mentioned earlier drug studies indicate that the LF range is a<br />

mixture <strong>of</strong> sympathetic and parasympathetic division activity. The ratio is an indication<br />

<strong>of</strong> both reciprocity and non-reciprocity [50].<br />

Figures 5.18 — 5.27 display the 5-minute activity plots <strong>of</strong> a COP subject at rest<br />

breathing at 16 breaths per minute using the Morlet, Meyer, Daubechies 4, Mexican Hat<br />

and Haar wavelet. The even figures (5.18, 5.20, 5.22, 5.24 and 5.26) present the low<br />

frequency, the high frequency and the ratio <strong>of</strong> low frequency to high frequency as<br />

obtained by summing the areas under the curves in the LF and HF bands at each instant <strong>of</strong><br />

time throughout the whole experiment period. The odd figures (5.19, 5.21, 5.23, 5.25<br />

and 5.27) present the normalized low frequency, the normalized high frequency and the<br />

normalized ratio <strong>of</strong> the low frequency to high frequency. The normalized LF and HF<br />

activity plots are obtained by dividing at each instant <strong>of</strong> time the LF and HF power by the<br />

sum <strong>of</strong> both as follows:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!