njit-etd2003-081 - New Jersey Institute of Technology

njit-etd2003-081 - New Jersey Institute of Technology njit-etd2003-081 - New Jersey Institute of Technology

archives.njit.edu
from archives.njit.edu More from this publisher
20.01.2015 Views

105 in time will result in a reduction of arterial pressure, causing simultaneous stimulation and inhibition of the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the ANS, respectively, producing an increase in the rate of depolarization. Obviously, the arterial pressure varies in many ways. During systole the ventricles contract, causing the pressure to build, and during diastole the ventricles relax and the pressure drops. However, the mean arterial pressure fluctuates in a much slower manner, and it is this activity that dictates the level of baroreflex response. In an effort to capture the dynamics of the baroreflex mechanism, it therefore becomes necessary to extend the previous models to include a class of systems that exhibit negative feedback, as shown in Figure 3.16. With the extended model to include a feedback loop and through the baroreflex mechanism, it will provide the baro-related heart rate variability in the lower frequency range (LF) through the intrinsic oscillations of the system. Figure 3.16 Feedback closed-loop ARX model.

106 The baroreflex, an autonomic reflex which controls heart rate through efferent vagal and sympathetic nerves by afferent inputs from pressure sensitive baroreceptors, is still mostly unknown. The neural control of the total cardiovascular system with several closed loops, of which the baroreflex is only a part, is very complex and that makes it difficult to assess characteristics of this reflex. If one was able to create a large enough broadband input signal and measure the input Blood Pressure (BP) as well as the output Heart Rate (HR), one could estimate from spectral calculations of input, output and cross- correlation, the amplitude and phase frequency characteristics of the baroreflex. Respiration is known to modulate BP as well as HR, the latter phenomenon called respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). However, the precise relationships are still under debate. Respiration affects primarily HR by central cardio-respiratory coupling and changes BP through variations in cardiac output. Respiration also directly modulates BP through mechanical effects of changing intrathoracic pressure on cardiac filling, which through the baroreflex causes HR variations at the respiration frequency. Recent studies [11[3] showed that respiration to a large extent primarily modulates BP and through the baroreflex, HR. The baroreflex with the respiratory influence can therefore schematically be visualized as in Figure 3.16. Under these assumptions one does have the possibility to "control" baroreflex input (BP) by letting a person breathe voluntarily according to a sinusoid on several fixed frequencies or a slowly changing frequency (sweep). Here it is desirable to prove the possibility of assessing gain and phase relations of the transfer function of BP and HR in a human, over a wide frequency range by voluntarily breathing at predetermined frequencies.

105<br />

in time will result in a reduction <strong>of</strong> arterial pressure, causing simultaneous stimulation<br />

and inhibition <strong>of</strong> the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches <strong>of</strong> the ANS,<br />

respectively, producing an increase in the rate <strong>of</strong> depolarization.<br />

Obviously, the arterial pressure varies in many ways. During systole the<br />

ventricles contract, causing the pressure to build, and during diastole the ventricles relax<br />

and the pressure drops. However, the mean arterial pressure fluctuates in a much slower<br />

manner, and it is this activity that dictates the level <strong>of</strong> baroreflex response.<br />

In an effort to capture the dynamics <strong>of</strong> the baroreflex mechanism, it therefore<br />

becomes necessary to extend the previous models to include a class <strong>of</strong> systems that<br />

exhibit negative feedback, as shown in Figure 3.16. With the extended model to include<br />

a feedback loop and through the baroreflex mechanism, it will provide the baro-related<br />

heart rate variability in the lower frequency range (LF) through the intrinsic oscillations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the system.<br />

Figure 3.16 Feedback closed-loop ARX model.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!