20.01.2015 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

34 Charlton and Zachariou<br />

could also be used; however, a good chelating stationary phase to use this metal<br />

ion in IMAC for the purification of proteins does not exist commercially. Al 3+ is<br />

also another example, however, the commercially available 8-hydroxyquinoline<br />

support would be more useful over IDA stationary phases for this metal ion.<br />

Borderline Lewis metal ions like Cu 2+ can also be used in this mode (7,14).<br />

9. Not all supports should be stored charged with metal ions. Silica-based supports<br />

should be stored free of metal ion and only charged when required. The charged<br />

metal ion causes a localized low pH microenvironment that can damage these<br />

supports over time, decreasing the life expectancy of the column.<br />

10. Under these conditions, histidine interaction with the IMCC should be quenched<br />

(7). Furthermore, the use of oxygen-rich buffers such as phosphate, acetate,<br />

carbonate and so on should be avoided whilst equilibrating hard Lewis IMCCs.<br />

Sulphonic acid-based buffers such as MES and other Good’s buffers used at ≤20<br />

mM have minimal interference and can be used.<br />

11. Any metal ion that can be hydrolyzed can be employed with any commercially<br />

available chelating stationary support for this section of work.<br />

References<br />

1. Hemdan, E.S., Zhao, Y. J., Sulkowski, E. and Porath, J. (1989). Surface topography<br />

of histidine residues: A facile probe by immobilized metal ion affinity<br />

chromatography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 1811–1815.<br />

2. Wirth, H.-J., Unger, K.K. and Hearn, M.T.W. (1993). Influence of ligand density<br />

on the proteins of metal-chelate affinity supports. Anal. Biochem. 208, 16–25.<br />

3. Porath, J., Carlsson, J., Olsson, I. and Belfrage, G. (1975). Metal chelate affinity<br />

chromatography, a new approach to protein fractionation. Nature 258, 598–599.<br />

4. Everson, J.R., and Parker, H.E., (1974). Zinc binding and synthesis of<br />

8-hydroxyquinoline-agarose. Bioinorg. Chem. 4, 15–20.<br />

5. Ramadan, N., and Porath, J. (1985). Fe(III)hydroxamate as immobilized metal<br />

affinity-adsorbent for protein chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 321, 93–104.<br />

6. Zachariou, M., and Hearn, M.T.W. (1996). Application of immobilized metal ionchelate<br />

complexes as pseudocation exchange adsorbents for protein separation.<br />

Biochemistry 35, 202–211.<br />

7. Zachariou, M., and Hearn, M.T.W. (1995). Protein selectivity in immobilized<br />

metal affinity chromatography based on the surface accessibility of aspartic and<br />

glutamic acid residues. J. Protein. Chem. 14, 419–430.<br />

8. Beitle, R.R., and Ataali, M.M. (1992). Immobilized metal affinity chromatography<br />

and related techniques. AlChE Symposium Series 88, 34–44.<br />

9. Wong, J.W., Albright, R.L. and Wang, N.-H. L. (1991). Immobilized metal ion<br />

affinity chromatography (IMAC) chemistry and bioseparation applications. Sep.<br />

Purif. Methods 20, 49–106.<br />

10. Arnold, F.H. (1991). Metal-affinity separations: A new dimension in protein<br />

processing. Bio\Technol. 9, 151–156.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!