View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate View - ResearchGate

20.01.2015 Views

326 Heegaard et al. 6.2.1.3. Equations Data analysis may be conducted in several ways (see Subheading 6.1, e.g. Eq. 5). Here, two equivalent approaches based on differences in effective electrophoretic mobility and in peak appearance times are described: 1. Mobility change in experiment with ligand concentration [L] added to the electrophoresis buffer in comparison with no ligand added: = max − K d × /L = effective, corrected electrophoretic mobility. = (lc × ld)/[V × (t − t m )] where t − t m is the difference between the peak appearance time and the appearance time of a non-interacting marker. lc is the total capillary length and ld is the length of the capillary to the detection window. , the mobility shift, i.e. the difference in between experiments with and without added ligand. max , the maximum mobility shift (in a fully saturated system). 2. Mobility change and corrected peak appearance time (t) using internal (added to the sample) reference marker: = lc/E × 1/t − 1/t r − 1/t 0 − 1/t r0 = lc/E × 1/t lc is total capillary length, E is field strength, subscript 0 denotes reference experiment without ligand addition. 1/t = 1/t − 1/t r − 1/t 0 − 1/t r0 i.e. difference in corrected inverse peak appearance time in experiment with and without added ligand. 3. Mobility change expressed using corrected peak appearance times: 1/t = 1/t max − K d × 1/t/L 4. Plots of as a function of [L] or (1/t) as a function of [L] should show a definite curvature (saturation). 5. Non-linear curve fitting to the plot using a one binding site–hyperbola function yields the K d if binding behaves according to a 1:1 molecular association binding isotherm of the equation: 1/t = 1/t max ×L/K d + L (see Fig. 6B) 6.2.1.4. Mobility Shift ACE Procedure 1. Preconditioning and inter-run washing procedures correspond to those given below for the pre-eq/FA-CE experiments. 2. Establish reproducible and suitable (e.g. physiological) analysis conditions for analyte, marker molecule and ligand separately, and ensure that they migrate differently. 3. Perform electrophoresis in the presence of various known concentrations of ligand added to the electrophoresis buffer. Depending on the availability, it will be advantageous to use the most charged molecule as the ligand (the buffer additive). Mix analyte in a suitable proportion with the marker molecule and perform the CE analysis. Look for migration shifts not affecting peak shape and size. 4. Perform affinity electrophoresis in the presence of ligand molar concentrations from 10 to 500 times the expected dissociation constant value while keeping the

326 Heegaard et al.<br />

6.2.1.3. Equations<br />

Data analysis may be conducted in several ways (see Subheading 6.1, e.g.<br />

Eq. 5). Here, two equivalent approaches based on differences in effective<br />

electrophoretic mobility and in peak appearance times are described:<br />

1. Mobility change in experiment with ligand concentration [L] added to the<br />

electrophoresis buffer in comparison with no ligand added:<br />

= max − K d × /L<br />

= effective, corrected electrophoretic mobility. = (lc × ld)/[V × (t − t m )] where<br />

t − t m is the difference between the peak appearance time and the appearance time<br />

of a non-interacting marker. lc is the total capillary length and ld is the length of<br />

the capillary to the detection window. , the mobility shift, i.e. the difference<br />

in between experiments with and without added ligand. max , the maximum<br />

mobility shift (in a fully saturated system).<br />

2. Mobility change and corrected peak appearance time (t) using internal (added to<br />

the sample) reference marker:<br />

= lc/E × 1/t − 1/t r − 1/t 0 − 1/t r0 = lc/E × 1/t<br />

lc is total capillary length, E is field strength, subscript 0 denotes reference experiment<br />

without ligand addition.<br />

1/t = 1/t − 1/t r − 1/t 0 − 1/t r0 i.e. difference in corrected inverse peak<br />

appearance time in experiment with and without added ligand.<br />

3. Mobility change expressed using corrected peak appearance times:<br />

1/t = 1/t max − K d × 1/t/L<br />

4. Plots of as a function of [L] or (1/t) as a function of [L] should show a<br />

definite curvature (saturation).<br />

5. Non-linear curve fitting to the plot using a one binding site–hyperbola function<br />

yields the K d if binding behaves according to a 1:1 molecular association binding<br />

isotherm of the equation: 1/t = 1/t max ×L/K d + L (see Fig. 6B)<br />

6.2.1.4. Mobility Shift ACE Procedure<br />

1. Preconditioning and inter-run washing procedures correspond to those given below<br />

for the pre-eq/FA-CE experiments.<br />

2. Establish reproducible and suitable (e.g. physiological) analysis conditions for<br />

analyte, marker molecule and ligand separately, and ensure that they migrate<br />

differently.<br />

3. Perform electrophoresis in the presence of various known concentrations of ligand<br />

added to the electrophoresis buffer. Depending on the availability, it will be<br />

advantageous to use the most charged molecule as the ligand (the buffer additive).<br />

Mix analyte in a suitable proportion with the marker molecule and perform the<br />

CE analysis. Look for migration shifts not affecting peak shape and size.<br />

4. Perform affinity electrophoresis in the presence of ligand molar concentrations<br />

from 10 to 500 times the expected dissociation constant value while keeping the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!