20.01.2015 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Affinity Capillary Electrophoresis 323<br />

HSA (d) and warfarin (e). The concentration of free warfarin is proportional<br />

to the height of the free ligand plateau (region (a) in Fig. 7A). In zone (b)<br />

where both warfarin and HSA is present the equilibrium is preserved. Thus,<br />

the amount of warfarin leaving this zone and entering zone (a) is equal to the<br />

free warfarin concentration in the original pre-incubated sample. CE-FA is well<br />

established for studying interactions between low-molecular weight ligands and<br />

macromolecules where the mobility of the macromolecule is equal to that of<br />

the complex (9). However, theory indicates that the free concentrations are<br />

overestimated when these mobility requirements are not fulfilled, and this may<br />

be the case for some low-affinity protein–protein interactions (92). For systems<br />

characterized by slow binding kinetics where re-equilibration does not occur<br />

during the separation CE-FA performs as pre-eq CZE, and the mobilities of<br />

the complex relative to the free species is not an issue. Quantitation and data<br />

analysis are usually conducted as described for pre-eq CZE except that plateau<br />

heights are used rather than peak areas.<br />

The first step in the characterization of an interaction system is to demonstrate<br />

binding. This is most easily accomplished using the mobility shift ACE format<br />

by conducting electrophoresis with and without the putative ligand added to<br />

the electrophoresis buffer. The sample should contain the analyte and a noninteracting<br />

marker molecule to correct for changes in the EEO flow. The<br />

existence of interactions will be revealed as a change in analyte mobility.<br />

The selection of the interacting species to be added to the electrophoresis<br />

buffer should be based on properties such as size, charge, UV-absorption<br />

properties and availability. Provided that the interaction kinetics is rapid and<br />

a 1:1 stoichiometry can be expected, mobility shift ACE may be used for<br />

further characterization of the system. If higher order stoichiometries are likely,<br />

one of the pre-incubation approaches should be considered if quantitative data<br />

are desired. In that case, the FA approach should be used initially as it is<br />

conducive to the study of interactions characterized by both fast- and slowdissociation<br />

kinetics. In case of slow kinetics, however, the use of pre-eq CZE<br />

may be advantageous as compared with CE-FA because resolution is much<br />

◭<br />

Fig. 6. to the detector. Electrophoresis took place at 8.5 kV in 0.1 M phosphate,<br />

pH 8.13, with additions of double-stranded 32mer biotin-DNA (dsDNA) at the concentrations<br />

given in the figure. Detection at 200 nm. (B) Data from binding experiments<br />

such as those presented in (A) plotted as outlined in Subheading 6.2.1. Data points<br />

represent the mean and the standard deviation of triplicate experiments. The curve<br />

represents a non-linear curve fit using a one-site binding hyperbola (GraphPadPrism).<br />

R 2 = 0.99. The equation for the curve yields a K d for the Mab–dsDNA interaction of<br />

0.10 M (Adapted with permission from (113)).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!