20.01.2015 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

320 Heegaard et al.<br />

where AL is the formed complex, [A], [L] and [AL] the equilibrium<br />

concentrations of the analyte, ligand and complex, respectively, and K the<br />

stability (association) constant. Mobility shift ACE is conducted by performing<br />

a series of CE experiments in which a small volume of the analyte and a noninteracting<br />

marker are introduced into the capillary while the electrophoresis<br />

buffer contains various known concentrations of the ligand. Provided that free<br />

and complexed analyte have different electrophoretic mobilities, the effective<br />

electrophoretic mobility of the analyte, eff , will depend on the concentration<br />

of the ligand added to the electrophoresis buffer according to<br />

A<br />

eff =<br />

A + AL AL<br />

A +<br />

A + AL AL (4)<br />

where A and AL are the electrophoretic mobilities of the free analyte and<br />

the AL complex, respectively. Equation 4 may be combined with Eq. 3 and<br />

rearranged to give<br />

eff = A + AL KL<br />

1 + KL<br />

A plot of eff as a function of the free ligand concentration, [L], will<br />

give the binding isotherm, and the stability constant may be obtained by<br />

non-linear regression analysis using a suitable software package. Given the<br />

use of an internal marker and use of the same buffer, temperature and field<br />

strength conditions in a series of mobility shift ACE experiments, the peak<br />

appearance time t can be used directly in plots to estimate binding constants<br />

(c.f. Subheading 6.2.1., below). The free ligand concentration in Eq. 5 is<br />

assumed to be equal to the total ligand concentration in the electrophoresis<br />

buffer. For this to be approximately true, the analyte concentration in the sample<br />

needs to be more than 10–100 times lower than the ligand concentration (87,88).<br />

Note, however, that in contrast to the ligand concentration, the concentration of<br />

the analyte does not need to be accurately known. If the binding kinetics is not<br />

fast relative to the separation time, it will be evident in the mobility shift experiments<br />

as disappearance, broadening, tailing or splitting of the analyte peak (87).<br />

As a rule, averaged, weighted peaks reflecting the association–dissociation time<br />

distribution will only occur if the dissociation half-time ln 2/k off is equal to or<br />

less than 1% of the peak appearance time (89). If the 1/k off -value is getting<br />

close to the analyte peak appearance time, the complexes are too stable for the<br />

mobility shift approach to be useful (87) (see Fig. 6 see Subheading 6.2.1). The<br />

figure illustrates a mobility shift experiment (of a monoclonal antibody interacting<br />

with its antigen) where the analyte peak is displaced by the anionic ligand<br />

(synthetic oligonucleotide) but otherwise unperturbed. Thus, the experiments<br />

can be used to estimate the binding constant for this interaction. In addition, in<br />

(5)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!