20.01.2015 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Affinity Capillary Electrophoresis 313<br />

If temperature in a sample-stacking zone is a concern, one may program a<br />

step-wise increase to ensure electrophoretic transport of the analyte into the<br />

electrophoresis buffer before the full field strength is applied (see Fig. 2). The<br />

choice of electrical parameters is otherwise an interplay between efficiency,<br />

time and induced temperature characteristics of the electrophoresis buffer<br />

(and thus on the efficiency of the cooling system). If as high a field<br />

strength as possible is desirable, one may use an Ohm’s law plot to estimate<br />

the breakthrough-current (where the linearity of current as a function of<br />

applied potential is lost because the resistance drops with uncontrollable<br />

increase in temperature caused by inadequate Joule heat dissipation) (21,47).<br />

Performing separations under constant current settings has the advantage that<br />

the amount of induced Joule heat is constant. With constant field strength,<br />

more constant migration times will be obtained. However, there will be current<br />

and thus temperature fluctuations. These are usually of minor importance if<br />

the temperature is kept constant and the conductivity in sample solution and<br />

electrophoresis buffer is not too different.<br />

Detector choices depend on the nature of the compounds involved in the<br />

affinity interaction and the scope of the analysis. In UV-absorbance detection,<br />

the concentration LOD is only in the low micromolar range for polypeptides<br />

(see Note 2). This confers a problem when measuring binding of lowconcentration<br />

analytes and molecules involved in strong binding interactions.<br />

In these situations, much lower detector sensitivity is required. Labelling of<br />

the interacting molecules with fluorescent probes will increase the sensitivity<br />

of the system, sometimes down to sub attoM concentration LOD (48), but<br />

also modifies the structure of the analyte covalently possibly changing analyte<br />

electrophoretic mobility and binding behaviour. Laser-induced fluorescence<br />

detection principles are reviewed in (49). The types of fluorescent probes<br />

available are diverse, and thus in many cases, it is possible to avoid the interfering<br />

effect caused by the labelling. One example is to carbohydrate-tag an<br />

analyte with fluorescein-thiosemicarbazide as example in studies of the binding<br />

interactions of rHLA–DR4 complex with influenza virus hemagglutinin peptide<br />

ligand. The fluorescein-thiosemicarbazide probe is attached at the carbohydrate<br />

moiety of the protein complex which is not involved in the interaction (32).<br />

Alternatives to the commonly used UV-absorbance and laser induced fluorescence<br />

(LIF) detectors are electrochemical detectors which have proven advantageous<br />

when analyzing for metal ions and small inorganic molecules in<br />

biological fluids (50), but which are difficult to use in conjunction with physiological<br />

buffers. Radioactivity based detectors may be very sensitive (51) but<br />

entail the use of non-standard detector equipment and require labelling of<br />

analytes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!