View - ResearchGate
View - ResearchGate View - ResearchGate
Immobilized Phospholipid Chromatography 301 therefore recommended to wash the column before commencing the separation, with 100% Buffer C until a stable baseline is reached followed by re-equilibration in Buffer A conditions. 4. The blank run may need to be repeated two to three times to ensure proper equilibration, particularly for a newly purchased column or if the column has been stored for a long time. 5. The addition of detergent to the mobile phase may be varied depending on the separation efficiency. The detergent, chaotrope additives, and phospholipids present in the collected fractions may affect typical methods such as the BCA method in determining the protein content. The detergent, chaotropes, and lipidcompatible methods (such as DC/RC protein kit from Bio-Rad or 2D protein Quant kit from Amersham Bioscience, Piscataway, NJ, USA) are required to accurately determine the amount of proteins. Compatibility of detergent to further 1D or 2D gel electrophoresis also needs to be considered for testing the purity of protein. 6. Removal of detergent from the collected fraction may be required to recover the activity of membrane proteins, which can be achieved by the selective adsorption of the detergent to hydrophobic substrates of Bio-Beads. 7. Column regeneration is typically achieved by continued washing with the starting or running buffer. However, because of the hydrophobic nature of membrane proteins, the binding of membrane proteins to the lipid ligands may be very strong. Hence, high stringency wash buffers are necessary to completely remove the residual bound membrane proteins. References 1. Wallin, E., and von Heijne, G., (1998) Genome-wide analysis of integral membrane proteins from eubacterial, archaean, and eukaryotic organisms. Protein Sci. 7, 1029–1038. 2. Gerstein, M., and Hegyi, H. (1998) Comparing genomes in terms of protein structure: surveys of a finite parts list. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 22, 277–304. 3. Hopkins, A. L., and Groom, C. R. (2002) The druggable genome. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 1, 727–730. 4. Kato, Y., Kitamura, T., Nakamura, K., Mitsui, A., Yamasaki, Y., and Hashimoto T. (1987) High-performance liquid chromatography of membrane proteins. J. Chromatogr. 391, 395–407. 5. Welling G. W., van der Zee, R., and Welling-Weister S. (1987) Column liquid chromatography of integral membrane proteins. J. Chromatogr. 418, 223–243. 6. Thomas, T. C., and McNamee, M. G. (1990) Purification of membrane proteins. Methods Enzymol. 182, 499–520. 7. Kashino, Y. (2003) Separation methods in the analysis of protein membrane complexes. J. Chromatogr. B 797, 191–216. 8. Pidgeon, C., and Venkataram, U. V. (1989) Immobilized artificial membrane chromatography: supports composed of membrane lipids. Anal. Biochem. 176, 36–47.
- Page 546: 18 Plasmid DNA Purification Via the
- Page 550: Plasmid DNA Purification 277 are pr
- Page 554: Plasmid DNA Purification 279 5. Dec
- Page 558: Plasmid DNA Purification 281 Initia
- Page 562: Plasmid DNA Purification 283 8. Bou
- Page 566: 286 Tchaga proteins is variable. Ho
- Page 570: 288 Tchaga residue is buried and is
- Page 574: 290 Tchaga 3. Centrifuge the tube a
- Page 578: 292 Tchaga 5. Use the BCA Protein A
- Page 582: 294 Tchaga 24. Figeys D., Gygi S.P.
- Page 586: 296 Lee and Aguilar The primary dif
- Page 590: 298 Lee and Aguilar 2.2. Equipment
- Page 594: 300 Lee and Aguilar Abs 280 PLA 2 A
- Page 600: 21 Analysis of Proteins in Solution
- Page 604: Affinity Capillary Electrophoresis
- Page 608: Affinity Capillary Electrophoresis
- Page 612: Affinity Capillary Electrophoresis
- Page 616: Affinity Capillary Electrophoresis
- Page 620: Affinity Capillary Electrophoresis
- Page 624: Affinity Capillary Electrophoresis
- Page 628: Affinity Capillary Electrophoresis
- Page 632: Affinity Capillary Electrophoresis
- Page 636: Affinity Capillary Electrophoresis
- Page 640: Affinity Capillary Electrophoresis
- Page 644: Affinity Capillary Electrophoresis
Immobilized Phospholipid Chromatography 301<br />
therefore recommended to wash the column before commencing the separation,<br />
with 100% Buffer C until a stable baseline is reached followed by re-equilibration<br />
in Buffer A conditions.<br />
4. The blank run may need to be repeated two to three times to ensure proper<br />
equilibration, particularly for a newly purchased column or if the column has been<br />
stored for a long time.<br />
5. The addition of detergent to the mobile phase may be varied depending on<br />
the separation efficiency. The detergent, chaotrope additives, and phospholipids<br />
present in the collected fractions may affect typical methods such as the BCA<br />
method in determining the protein content. The detergent, chaotropes, and lipidcompatible<br />
methods (such as DC/RC protein kit from Bio-Rad or 2D protein Quant<br />
kit from Amersham Bioscience, Piscataway, NJ, USA) are required to accurately<br />
determine the amount of proteins. Compatibility of detergent to further 1D or 2D<br />
gel electrophoresis also needs to be considered for testing the purity of protein.<br />
6. Removal of detergent from the collected fraction may be required to recover the<br />
activity of membrane proteins, which can be achieved by the selective adsorption<br />
of the detergent to hydrophobic substrates of Bio-Beads.<br />
7. Column regeneration is typically achieved by continued washing with the starting<br />
or running buffer. However, because of the hydrophobic nature of membrane<br />
proteins, the binding of membrane proteins to the lipid ligands may be very<br />
strong. Hence, high stringency wash buffers are necessary to completely remove<br />
the residual bound membrane proteins.<br />
References<br />
1. Wallin, E., and von Heijne, G., (1998) Genome-wide analysis of integral membrane<br />
proteins from eubacterial, archaean, and eukaryotic organisms. Protein Sci. 7,<br />
1029–1038.<br />
2. Gerstein, M., and Hegyi, H. (1998) Comparing genomes in terms of protein<br />
structure: surveys of a finite parts list. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 22, 277–304.<br />
3. Hopkins, A. L., and Groom, C. R. (2002) The druggable genome. Nat. Rev. Drug<br />
Discov. 1, 727–730.<br />
4. Kato, Y., Kitamura, T., Nakamura, K., Mitsui, A., Yamasaki, Y., and Hashimoto<br />
T. (1987) High-performance liquid chromatography of membrane proteins.<br />
J. Chromatogr. 391, 395–407.<br />
5. Welling G. W., van der Zee, R., and Welling-Weister S. (1987) Column liquid<br />
chromatography of integral membrane proteins. J. Chromatogr. 418, 223–243.<br />
6. Thomas, T. C., and McNamee, M. G. (1990) Purification of membrane proteins.<br />
Methods Enzymol. 182, 499–520.<br />
7. Kashino, Y. (2003) Separation methods in the analysis of protein membrane<br />
complexes. J. Chromatogr. B 797, 191–216.<br />
8. Pidgeon, C., and Venkataram, U. V. (1989) Immobilized artificial membrane<br />
chromatography: supports composed of membrane lipids. Anal. Biochem. 176,<br />
36–47.