20.01.2015 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

286 Tchaga<br />

proteins is variable. However, phosphohistidine is estimated to be 10- to 100-<br />

fold more abundant than phosphotyrosine, but less abundant than phosphoserine<br />

and phosphothreonine (8).<br />

The only currently viable method for enrichment of the complete phosphoprotein<br />

complement is immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (IMAC)<br />

with hard metal ions.<br />

IMAC was introduced by Porath and coworkers (9) in 1975 under the name<br />

of metal chelate affinity chromatography. This short publication reported for the<br />

first time the use of immobilized zinc and copper metal ions for the fractionation<br />

of proteins from human serum.<br />

The classical system cited by most scientists in the IMAC field is that of<br />

Pearson (10), who postulated that metal ions can be divided into three categories<br />

according to their preferential reactivity with nucleophiles: hard, intermediate,<br />

and soft. To the group of hard metal ions belong Fe 3+ ,Ca 2+ , and Al 3+ all of<br />

which have a preference for oxygen.<br />

Hundreds of papers have been published since, describing the use of immobilized<br />

hard metal ions in group separations of phosphorylated proteins, and the<br />

future of this particular application field looks very bright indeed (11–24). These<br />

adsorbents are also finding broad application for enrichment of phosphorylated<br />

peptides (25–29).<br />

In this chapter, an outline is presented of a typical experimental protocol that<br />

ensures reproducible and quantitative enrichment of all phosphorylated proteins<br />

with exposed phosphorylated side chains.<br />

When attempting to enrich the phosphorylated proteins from any given<br />

biological sample, one needs to take into consideration the following issues:<br />

1. Phosphorylation–dephosphorylation processes are generally quick processes.<br />

Important consideration must therefore be given to the time for extraction, loading<br />

of the sample and the initial washes (30). Speedy removal of phosphatases is<br />

important as the presence of phosphatase inhibitors such as sodium ortho-vanadate,<br />

might be undesirable during the chromatography.<br />

2. In general, gaining an as complete as possible enrichment is more important<br />

than obtaining a higher purification factor that results in losses of phosphorylated<br />

proteins in the non-adsorbed fraction (see Table 1 and Fig. 1 for typical yields of<br />

phosphorylated proteins from different sources). It is clear, therefore, that further<br />

reduction of complexity has to occur after this first step (before one would be<br />

able to identify and quantify the individual phosphorylated proteins from the total<br />

proteome).<br />

3. Selective and complete enrichment of the total phosphorylated proteome is impossible<br />

under native conditions. A simple example is the formation of homodimeric<br />

and heterodimeric Stat protein complexes upon their phosphorylation and<br />

transport to the nucleus (31,32). In this case, a phosphorylated side chain of<br />

tyrosine is involved in the formation of the Stat protein dimers. Accordingly, this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!