20.01.2015 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Affinity Chromatography 13<br />

Liquid chromatography is regarded as an indispensable tool in proteomics<br />

allowing the discrimination of proteins by diverse principles based on reversephase,<br />

ion exchange, size-exclusion, hydrophobic and affinity interactions (65).<br />

The technique is potentially useful not only for the separation of specific groups<br />

of proteins, but also for the exploration of post-translational modifications and<br />

the study of protein–protein and protein–ligand interactions (66).<br />

Furthermore, the use of affinity chromatography to enrich scarce proteins<br />

or deplete over-abundant proteins is a powerful means of enhancing the<br />

resolution and sensitivity in two-dimensional electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) or<br />

mass spectrometry (MS) analysis. Isotope-encoded affinity tags may represent<br />

a new tool for the analysis of complex mixtures of proteins in living systems<br />

(67). Alternatively, element-encoded metal chelates may also prove helpful for<br />

affinity chromatography, quantification and identification of tagged peptides<br />

from complex mixtures by LC-MS/MS (68).<br />

A significant development in affinity techniques for proteomics is the use of<br />

fusion tags or proteins for expression and purification (69–71). A large choice<br />

of systems is available for expression in bacterial hosts, with a further selection<br />

amenable for eukaryotic cells. Amongst the most popular fusion partners for<br />

molecular, structural and bioprocessing applications are the polyArg (72),<br />

hexaHis-tag (73), glutathione-S-transferase (74) and maltose-binding protein<br />

(75). Other less commonly employed expression tags include thioredoxin (76),<br />

the Z-domain from Protein A (77), NusA (68), GB1 domain from Protein G (78)<br />

and others (79). A recent comparison of the efficiency of eight elutable affinity<br />

tags for the purification of proteins from E. coli, yeast, Drosophila and HeLa<br />

extracts shows that none of these tags is universally superior for a particular<br />

system because proteins do not naturally lend themselves to high throughput<br />

analysis and they display diverse and individualistic physicochemical properties<br />

(80). It was found that the His-tag provided good yields of tagged protein from<br />

inexpensive, high capacity resins but with only moderate purity from E. coli<br />

extracts and poor purification from the other extracts. Cellulose-binding protein<br />

provided good purification from HeLa extracts. Consequently, affinity tags<br />

are invaluable tools for structural and functional proteomics as well as being<br />

used extensively in the expression and purification of proteins (81). Affinity<br />

tags can have a positive impact on the yield, solubility and folding of their<br />

complementary fusion partners. Combinatorial tagging might be the solution to<br />

choosing the most appropriate partner in high throughput scenarios (70,81).<br />

2.5. Resolution of Isoforms<br />

Heterogeneity in proteins may arise due to variations in post-translational<br />

modifications during the synthesis of a protein in native, recombinant or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!